What does smartphone war mean for innovation?

Aug 30, 2012 by Dawn C. Chmielewski And Jessica Guynn

Steve Jobs didn't live to see the outcome of the bruising war that pitted his iPhone and iPad against mobile devices that use Google's Android software.

But he issued the call to arms.

"I am going to destroy , because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go to thermonuclear war on this," Jobs told , author of a posthumously published biography of the Apple co-founder. "They are scared to death, because they know they are guilty."

Apple won a resounding victory Friday in a lawsuit against ., in which jurors found that the South Korean manufacturer had infringed on six of Apple's patents for . The $1 billion award is among the largest intellectual property awards on record.

It could well set the stage for other of rival device-makers.

The stakes are incredibly high. The global smartphone market, which estimates could reach $207.6 billion this year, has sparked lawsuits around the world as the various players jockey for position.

Already, smartphones powered by Android make up about 68 percent of , according to research firm IDC, compared to Apple's 17 percent.

Samsung is fueling the growing popularity of the system, according to IDC - the manufacturer shipped 44 percent of all Android smartphones in the most recent quarter worldwide.

"The smartphone patent wars are taking place in many courts in this country, and all over the world," said Rutgers University law professor Michael Carrier. "What is so important about this one, this is the first time that the court has found that one of these manufacturers has infringed patents of a company like Apple - so it really is pivotal, because Samsung is the leading manufacturer of smartphones in the U.S. today."

Some experts predict the Samsung ruling will send manufacturers back to the drawing board, as they try to design smartphone and tablets to avoid violating Apple's patents.

Samsung, which said it plans to appeal the verdict, said the court decision threatens to stifle creativity.

"Today's verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer," the company said in a statement released soon after the verdict was delivered.

Other technologists - most notably at Apple - see it differently.

"We chose legal action very reluctantly and only after repeatedly asking Samsung to stop copying our work," Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook wrote in an email to employees. "We value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the best products on earth. And we do this to delight our customers, not for competitors to flagrantly copy."

The next big shoe to drop in the case is scheduled for Sept. 20, when there is hearing to ban infringing Samsung phones from U.S. store shelves.

It is unclear how far-reaching the judge's ruling will be. Some legal experts predict changes are inevitable for Samsung should the ruling stand.

"In a nutshell, yes there will be some delay to market with respect to similar-looking smartphones that need to be redesigned," said Christopher Carani, a partner with the Chicago-based intellectual property law firm McAndrews, Held & Malloy.

Other observers think the impact on Samsung could be limited.

"For most of the technologies at issue, Samsung will be able to download a software upgrade and swap the infringing technology for something perfectly legitimate," said Douglas Lichtman, a law professor at the University of California-Los Angeles. One of the decisions in the case was that Samsung violated Apple's technology relating screen icons.

Addressing design similarities to Apple's products could be thornier, as manufacturers seek to refine the look of their devices.

Because of the long development cycle for products, it could take anywhere from 18 to 36 months for mobile devices with a dramatically different appearance or software features to reach the market, said Jefferson Wang of IBB Consulting.

One legal expert would rather see technology giants compete in the marketplace.

"The best thing for society and for consumers is if all technology companies would take all the money they are spending on lawyers and experts ... and instead invested that money in research and design," said Santa Clara University Brian Love.

Explore further: Verizon 2Q profit rises 93 percent

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Japan court to rule on Apple-Samsung patent brawl

Aug 30, 2012

A Japanese court on Friday will issue a ruling in a bitter patent dispute between Apple and its South Korean rival Samsung, the latest case in a global war between the two technology giants.

Apple wants billions from Samsung in patent fight

Jul 24, 2012

Apple told a US court Tuesday it will seek damages of more than $2.5 billion from Samsung in a patent infringement case accusing the South Korean firm of copying the iPhone and iPad maker.

Samsung vows counter-action over Apple patent suit

Apr 19, 2011

Samsung Electronics said Tuesday it would take counter-action against Apple after the US firm filed suit alleging that the South Korean giant copied its smartphones and tablet computers. ...

Apple wins $1bn in patent suit against Samsung

Aug 24, 2012

Apple won more than $1 billion in a massive US court victory over Samsung on Friday, in one of the biggest patent cases in decades—a verdict that could have huge market repercussions.

Samsung vows 'all measures' to keep products in US

Aug 28, 2012

South Korea's Samsung Electronics vowed on Tuesday to take "all necessary measures" to keep its products on US store shelves, in response to Apple's request for a ban on sales of some smartphones. ...

Recommended for you

Verizon 2Q profit rises 93 percent

32 minutes ago

Verizon reported Tuesday that its second-quarter earnings nearly doubled after it secured full ownership of Verizon Wireless.

Comcast 2Q earnings top views on Internet hookups

1 hour ago

Comcast Corp.'s second-quarter net income rose 15 percent to nearly $2 billion as it added high-speed Internet customers at a faster pace than a year ago and video subscriber losses moderated.

Ex-Qualcomm exec pleads guilty to insider trading

15 hours ago

A former high-ranking executive of US computer chip giant Qualcomm pleaded guilty Monday to insider trading charges, including trades on a 2011 deal for Atheros Communications, officials said.

Media venture creates press litigation fund

16 hours ago

The media venture created by entrepreneur Pierre Omidyar said Monday it was establishing a fund to help defend journalists in cases involving freedom of the press.

User comments : 0