US Senate fails to approve cybersecurity measure (Update)

Aug 02, 2012 by RICHARD LARDNER
A bill aimed at protecting the United States from cyber attacks failed to advance in the US Senate. General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pictured in July 2012, said the bill was needed to protect infrastructure critical to safeguarding national defense.

The Senate failed Thursday to pass legislation to protect the U.S. electrical grid, water supplies and other critical industries from cyberattack and electronic espionage, despite dire warnings from top national security officials about the potential for devastating assaults on American computer networks.

Both Republicans and Democrats said they are committed to approving a final bill when they return in September from a monthlong recess. But deep divisions between the two parties over the right approach to cybersecurity will make it difficult to forge a compromise. And there is very little time left to get a deal done with presidential and congressional elections coming up in November.

The White House and Senate Democrats blamed Republicans for blocking what they called the only comprehensive piece of cybersecurity legislation that would have given the federal government and businesses the tools they need to deal with vulnerabilities in the nation's critical infrastructure. More than 80 percent of the infrastructure, which includes financial networks, transportation systems and chemical plants, are owned and operated by the private sector.

"The politics of obstructionism, driven by special interest groups seeking to avoid accountability, prevented Congress from passing legislation to better protect our nation from potentially catastrophic cyber-attacks," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in a statement.

Failure to approve the Senate's Cybersecurity Act of 2012 before the August congressional recess amounted to a rejection of advice from senior national security officials, including Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who have been calling for Congress to act now on comprehensive legislation to deal with cyberthreats.

"The uncomfortable reality of our world today is that bits and bytes can be as threatening as bullets and bombs," Dempsey said in an Aug. 1 letter to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat.

The principal stumbling block in Congress is what role the Homeland Security Department and other federal agencies should play in protecting U.S. businesses from cyberattacks. Republicans argued the bill would have led to rules imposed by Washington that would only increase the private sector's costs without substantially reducing its risks. They also said Democrats who control the Senate tried to ram the bill through without adequate time for debate.

"No one doubts the need to strengthen our nation's cybersecurity defenses," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican. The issue, he added, is how the Democratic leadership "has tried to steamroll a bill that would address it."

A cloture motion filed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, to limit debate and force a vote on the bill fell well short of the 60 votes needed to pass, failing 52-46. Congress is scheduled to go on its August recess at the end of the week and will not return until after Sept. 3.

The White House and Senate Democrats criticized Republicans for allowing the pro-business U.S. Chamber of Commerce to have such a prominent voice in a debate over a pressing national security issue. Democrats said they made substantial revisions to the legislation after the Republicans and the chamber complained it would expand the federal government's regulatory authority over businesses already struggling in a tough economy.

The new version of the bill offered incentives, such as liability protection and technical assistance, to businesses that voluntarily participated in a government-managed cybersecurity program. Industry associations and groups would be involved in developing the standards needed to blunt the risks of cyberattacks, according to the revised legislation.

But the chamber said the voluntary program was nothing more than a "springboard" to federal regulations that would take time and money away from efforts businesses already have under way to protect their networks. Once a "government-driven 'voluntary' standards system is enacted," the chamber said on its FreeEnterprise blog, "it's only a short hop to a mandatory one because the administration has the intent and regulatory leverage."

The Cybersecurity Act would also create a framework for federal agencies and the private sector to exchanges information about cyberthreats or malicious software that can destroy computer networks if it's not detected. Provisions were included in the bill to ensure privacy and civil liberties aren't violated, said the bill's primary sponsors, Sens. Susan Collins, a Republican and Joe Lieberman, an independent.

But the Chamber and other Republicans support a competing bill drafted by Sen. John McCain, a Republican, that is similar to legislation passed by the House in late April. Those bills are focused only on the sharing of threat information between the federal government and private sector. The White House threatened to veto the House bill, however, over concerns the bill didn't do enough to protect privacy rights.

Explore further: Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

2.3 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

House moves ahead with cybersecurity bill (Update)

Apr 26, 2012

(AP) -- House Republicans are pushing ahead with legislation to protect the nation's critical infrastructure and corporations from electronic attacks despite Obama administration objections that the legislation fails to ...

Senate may go on break without passing cyber bill

Aug 02, 2012

The U.S. Senate could leave town this week for a monthlong break without passing legislation to protect the country's electrical grid, water supplies and other critical industries from cyberattack and electronic espionage.

House OKs cybersecurity bill despite veto threat

Apr 27, 2012

The House ignored Obama administration objections Thursday and approved legislation aimed at helping stop electronic attacks on critical U.S. infrastructure and private companies.

Lawmakers optimistic about cyber bill prospects

Apr 27, 2012

(AP) -- House Republicans and Democrats expressed optimism Friday about sending a cybersecurity bill to President Barack Obama this year despite significant disagreements with the Senate and the White House. ...

Recommended for you

Britain's UKIP issues online rules after gaffes

49 minutes ago

UK Independence Party (UKIP), the British anti-European Union party, has ordered a crackdown on the use of social media by supporters and members following a series of controversies.

Sony saga blends foreign intrigue, star wattage

59 minutes ago

The hackers who hit Sony Pictures Entertainment days before Thanksgiving crippled the network, stole gigabytes of data and spilled into public view unreleased films and reams of private and sometimes embarrassing ...

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

Dec 18, 2014

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
4 / 5 (4) Aug 02, 2012
Conservatives are the greatest enemy America has ever faced.
Claudius
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 02, 2012
If only this were the final word on this. Unfortunately, they will keep trying until they get it passed, when no one is looking.
TrinityComplex
not rated yet Aug 02, 2012
Read both bills (if you can find them) and judge for yourself which is better.
http://www.senate...home.htm
antonima
not rated yet Aug 02, 2012
Maybe this is a good idea.. look at what happened to Iran's nuclear program and oil industry. Hacking can cause very serious damage, and it can and will be used by military forces around the world.
AWaB
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2012
The private sector has been doing just fine protecting our infrastructure from malicious attacks. Forcing them to take orders or anything else from bureaucrats is stupid.

VD, you should try reading some history books. It might surprise you that we can attribute far more corpses to the socialists/communists than the capitalists. Your socialism is the disease.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.