Nano-structures to realise hydrogen's energy potential

August 15, 2012

( -- For the first time, engineers at the University of New South Wales have demonstrated that hydrogen can be released and reabsorbed from a promising storage material, overcoming a major hurdle to its use as an alternative fuel source.

Researchers from the Materials Energy Research Laboratory in nanoscale (MERLin) at UNSW have synthesised nanoparticles of a commonly overlooked called sodium borohydride and encased these inside nickel shells.

Their unique "core-" nanostructure has demonstrated remarkable hydrogen storage properties, including the release of energy at much lower temperatures than previously observed.

“No one has ever tried to synthesise these particles at the nanoscale because they thought it was too difficult, and couldn’t be done. We’re the first to do so, and demonstrate that energy in the form of hydrogen can be stored with sodium borohydride at practical temperatures and pressures,” says Dr Kondo-Francois Aguey-Zinsou from the School of Chemical Engineering at UNSW.

Considered a major a fuel of the future, hydrogen could be used to power buildings, portable electronics and vehicles – but this application hinges on practical storage technology.

Lightweight compounds known as borohydrides (including lithium and sodium compounds) are known to be effective storage materials but it was believed that once the energy was released it could not be reabsorbed – a critical limitation. This perceived “irreversibility” means there has been little focus on sodium borohydride.

However, the result, published last week in the journal ACS Nano, demonstrates for the first time that reversibility is indeed possible using a borohydride material by itself and could herald significant advances in the design of novel materials.

“By controlling the size and architecture of these structures we can tune theirproperties and make them reversible – this means they can release and reabsorb hydrogen,” says Aguey-Zinsou, lead author on the paper. “We now have a way to tap into all these borohydride materials, which are particularly exciting for application on vehicles because of their highhydrogen storage capacity.”

The researchers observed remarkable improvements in the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of their material. This means the chemical reactions needed to absorb and release hydrogen occurred faster than previously studied materials, and at significantly reduced temperatures – making possible application far more practical.

In its bulk form, sodium borohydride requires temperatures above 550 degrees Celsius just to release hydrogen. Even on the nano-scale the improvements were minimal. However, with their core-shell , the researchers saw initial energy release happening at just 50 °C, and significant release at 350 °C.

“The new materials that could be generated by this exciting strategy could provide practical solutions to meet many of the energy targets set by the US Department of Energy,” says Aguey-Zinsou. “The key thing here is that we’ve opened the doorway.”

Explore further: Brookhaven Scientists Working Toward Practical Hydrogen-Storage Materials

More information:

Related Stories

New form of compound stimulates research on hydrogen storage

December 3, 2007

Research on hydrogen-fueled cars may be one step closer to application thanks to a new form of hydride discovered by scientists at the ESRF. The material, lithium borohydride, is a promising energy storage system: it contains ...

Hydrogen storage in nanoparticles works

March 31, 2008

Dutch chemist Kees Baldé has demonstrated that hydrogen can be efficiently stored in nanoparticles. This allows hydrogen storage to be more easily used in mobile applications. Baldé discovered that 30 nanometre particles ...

Baking powder for environmentally friendly hydrogen storage

June 14, 2011

( -- Hydrogen is under consideration as a promising energy carrier for a future sustainable energy economy. However, practicable solutions for the easy and safe storage of hydrogen are still being sought. Despite ...

Recommended for you

Reshaping the solar spectrum to turn light to electricity

July 28, 2015

When it comes to installing solar cells, labor cost and the cost of the land to house them constitute the bulk of the expense. The solar cells—made often of silicon or cadmium telluride—rarely cost more than 20 percent ...

Could stronger, tougher paper replace metal?

July 24, 2015

Researchers at the University of Maryland recently discovered that paper made of cellulose fibers is tougher and stronger the smaller the fibers get. For a long time, engineers have sought a material that is both strong (resistant ...

Wafer-thin material heralds future of wearable technology

July 27, 2015

UOW's Institute for Superconducting and Electronic Materials (ISEM) has successfully pioneered a way to construct a flexible, foldable and lightweight energy storage device that provides the building blocks for next-generation ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.3 / 5 (4) Aug 15, 2012
For the first time? Lithium hydride has been around for years! Seems to me like a coverup.
1 / 5 (3) Aug 15, 2012
"Considered a major a fuel of the future, hydrogen could be used to power buildings, ........"

I could not think of a more wasteful way to power a building.

Who writes these articles??????
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
I just looked up the autoignition temp of H2: 500 C.

Now I know why the release temp of 550 C is a nonstarter!
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
@MR166 -- You need to rethink your definition of "wasteful". Go to Beijing and you will see cheap coal-fired power that is spewing WASTE products (SOX, NOX, soot, and CO2) into the air, destroying peoples lungs, acidifying the oceans, destroying infrastructure, changing the climate, and polluting the West Coast of the US. That is wasteful.
1 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2012
Shakescene you need to review your basic physics. In particular, read up on EROEI and you will find that creating H2 and then using it to heat a building results in a huge energy loss regardless of the energy source. BTW there is no such thing as a totally pollution free source of energy. Even solar and wind power are not pollution free.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
MR166 I think Shakescene21 and the article are referring to Fuel Cells which from my understanding are alot more efficient than boilers.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
@MR166 --You need to focus on 21st Century technologies, and to broaden your definition of Waste to include damage to downwind people and environment. I admit that H2 will not be used as much to heat buildings (at first) as it would be for transportation and specialized uses. I think everyone agrees that all energy sources will incur some pollution or environmental damage but fossils fuels are the biggest problem, especially coal and bunker oil. The environmental damage could be reduced dramatically by existing technology and by dramatic new technology, some of which is covered here in Physorg.
3 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2012
"Considered a major a fuel of the future, hydrogen could be used to power buildings, ........"

I could not think of a more wasteful way to power a building.

Who writes these articles??????


These idiots do not realize that Hydrogen is only "clean" if the source of the original process to produce that hydrogen is "clean".

Additionally, in almost any case imaginable, direct solar, wind, or geothermal energy will be about 2 or 3 times more productive and efficient for powering buildings than would any hydrogen or natural gas fuel cell or generator.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
If you couple hydrogen production with nuclear power you have truly clean hydrogen. Plus due to the quantities produced the low efficiency of splitting water can be ignored.
1 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2012
Cornelius you are still better off using the electricity directly and not converting it to a less useful form of energy. This will allow the power produced to reduce the amount of fossil burned by the greatest amount. The energy density of fossil fuels make them ideal for transportation use. To use electricity to produce transportation fuels is counterproductive as long as we are still using fossil fuels to produce electric power. If 100% of our electric power was being generated by non-fossil sources then perhaps H2 could be created by any excess electricity produced.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
Mr166 that's exactly what I mean. During low demand excess capacity is used to split water and produce electricity in peak times. Use the hydrogen produced in fuel cells to power vehicles or for applications that can't be wired. The fact that you don't get the same amount of energy out of the hydrogen as you put in at that point doesn't matter because the extra grid capacity takes relatively no increase in operational costs.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2012
"Considered a major a fuel of the future, hydrogen could be used to power buildings, ........"
I could not think of a more wasteful way to power a building.

For example, buildings made of glass covered with transparent solar coating. A transparent glass coating that can convert the infrared spectrum of light into electricity is now becoming cost effective for cities with hot weather, as it does not increase the cost of glass production in comparison with infrared insulating layers or smoked glass, and it also reduces the need of air conditioned. But they would also need a cost effective battery with high capacity to store the electricity captured on weekends or at non-peak hours and release it at peak time (when electricity is more expensive), or when no sun is available. Lithium batteries have much lower capacity than a fuel cell, and they are too expensive. In general, this kind of improvements to fuel cells are the key to make solar and wind energy more widely adopted.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.