New intellectual testing regimen identifies 'exceptional' chimp

Aug 30, 2012 by Bob Yirka report

(—Quite often, those people who take care of animals learn over time which are smarter than others. They don't need to test them, they see it in the way the animals behave. Unfortunately, that's not very scientific, so evolutionary anthropologists Esther Herrmann and Josep Call have devised a number of challenges for three groups of chimps to see if perhaps a measure of intelligence can be determined for a given species. They have published a report of their findings in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, one of which is the discovery that one chimp clearly stood out from the rest.

The challenges the two came up with for the included such things as finding hidden food, showing them how to do something than seeing if the chimp could emulate it, using a tool to accomplish a task and others related to shape, color or size differentiation. They tested chimps at sanctuaries in Uganda and the and a third group in a zoo in Germany. In so doing they found that there wasn't really any one thing that stood out as a hallmark of high intelligence among the groups. Instead, some chimps were found to be really good at some tasks and not so good at others. The one exception was a chimp named Natasha who scored very high on all the tests, leading the researchers to label her exceptional.

Those who take care of Natasha have been saying as much all along. She'd become notorious for her antics at the Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary, where she resides. She escapes enclosures that hold other , at one point using branches to figure out if an electric fence was working. She teases handlers and visitors to the park and sometimes squirts them with water. When asked, all of those who worked with her at the park put her name on the list of the smartest in the group.

Pinning down just what exactly high intelligence means however, is not so easy to do. With people, tests have been devised that may or may not be true measures of exceptional intelligence, and as with the chimps, some people who are capable of genius in some areas such as painting, may be average at best in other areas. Thus the term genius has become a loosely defined label if ever there was one. Thus the researchers are hesitant to apply the term to Natasha, despite the fact that she is clearly smarter than any other chimp tested.

Explore further: Insect mating behavior has lessons for drones

More information: Are there geniuses among the apes? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 5 October 2012 vol. 367 no. 1603 2753-2761 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0191

We are often asked whether some apes are smarter than others. Here we used two individual-based datasets on cognitive abilities to answer this question and to elucidate the structure of individual differences. We identified some individuals who consistently scored well across multiple tasks, and even one individual who could be classified as exceptional when compared with her conspecifics. However, we found no general intelligence factor. Instead, we detected some clusters of certain abilities, including inferences, learning and perhaps a tool-use and quantities cluster. Thus, apes in general and chimpanzees in particular present a pattern characterized by the existence of some smart animals but no evidence of a general intelligence factor. This conclusion contrasts with previous studies that have found evidence of a g factor in primates. However, those studies have used group-based as opposed to the individual-based data used here, which means that the two sets of analyses are not directly comparable. We advocate an approach based on testing multiple individuals (of multiple species) on multiple tasks that capture cognitive, motivational and temperament factors affecting performance. One of the advantages of this approach is that it may contribute to reconcile the general and domain-specific views on primate intelligence.

Related Stories

'Peter Pan' Apes Never Seem To Learn Selfishness

Feb 01, 2010

( -- Sharing is a behavior on which day care workers and kindergarten teachers tend to offer young humans a lot of coaching. But for our ape cousins the bonobos, sharing just comes naturally.

Recommended for you

Insect mating behavior has lessons for drones

21 hours ago

Male moths locate females by navigating along the latter's pheromone (odor) plume, often flying hundreds of meters to do so. Two strategies are involved to accomplish this: males must find the outer envelope ...

Godwits are flexible... when they get the chance

May 29, 2015

Black-tailed godwits are able to cope with unpredictable weather. This was revealed by a thorough analysis of the extraordinary spring of 2013 by ecologist Nathan Senner of the University of Groningen and ...

Do you have the time? Flies sure do

May 28, 2015

Flies might be smarter than you think. According to research reported in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on May 28, fruit flies know what time of day it is. What's more, the insects can learn to con ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Aug 30, 2012
Replacing the word 'apes' with the word 'humans' is not an option?

In the material sciences there is no universal material constant.
(The 'tangible' analog to an 'intangible' 'general intelligence factor' sought from the cognitive sciences.)
not rated yet Aug 30, 2012
I'd vote for her.
1 / 5 (2) Aug 31, 2012
this study gives new meaning to the saying, 'smarter than an ape,' which , incidentally, isnt' even a saying at all.

please delete for pointless verbiage.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.