Diseased trees new source of climate gas

Aug 07, 2012

Diseased trees in forests may be a significant new source of methane that causes climate change, according to researchers at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies in Geophysical Research Letters.

Sixty trees sampled at Yale Myers in northeastern Connecticut contained concentrations of that were as high as 80,000 times ambient levels. Normal air concentrations are less than 2 parts per million, but the Yale researchers found average levels of 15,000 parts per million inside trees.

"These are flammable concentrations," said Kristofer Covey, the study's lead author and a Ph.D. candidate at Yale. "Because the conditions thought to be driving this process are common throughout the world's forests, we believe we have found a globally significant new source of this potent greenhouse gas."

The estimated emission rate from an upland site at the Yale forest is roughly equivalent to burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hectare of forest per year. It also has a global warming potential equivalent to 18 percent of the carbon being sequestered by these forests, reducing their climate benefit of carbon sequestration by nearly one-fifth.

"If we extrapolate these findings to forests globally, the methane produced in trees represents 10 percent of global emissions," said Xuhui Lee, a co-author of the study and Sara Shallenberger Brown Professor of Meteorology at Yale. "We didn't know this pathway existed."

The trees producing methane are older—between 80 and 100 years old—and diseased. Although outwardly healthy, they are being hollowed out by a common fungal infection that slowly eats through the trunk, creating conditions favorable to methane-producing microorganisms called methanogens.

"No one until now has linked the idea that fungal rot of timber trees, a production problem in commercial forestry, might also present a problem for greenhouse gas and climate change mitigation," said Mark Bradford, a co-author and Assistant Professor of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology at F&ES.

Red maple, an abundant species in North America, had the highest methane concentrations, but other common species, including oak, birch and pine were also producers of the gas. The rate of methane emissions was 3.1 times higher in the summer, suggesting that higher temperatures may lead to increasing levels of forest methane that, in turn, lead to ever-higher temperatures.

"These findings suggest decay in living is important to biogeochemists and atmospheric scientists seeking to understand global greenhouse gas budgets and associated ," said Covey.

Explore further: EPA suggests triggers for warning of algae in drinking water

More information: "Elevated Methane Concentrations in Trees of an Upland Forest," www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/pip/2012GL052361.shtml

Related Stories

Recommended for you

How climate science denial affects the scientific community

1 hour ago

Climate change denial in public discourse may encourage climate scientists to over-emphasise scientific uncertainty and is also affecting how they themselves speak - and perhaps even think - about their own research, a new ...

Scientists go high-tech to study fragile cold-water reefs

13 hours ago

Coral reefs are generally associated with warm, shallow and crystal-clear waters in the tropics. Other species of coral, however, flourish in the deep cold ocean where they also form large reefs. Now researchers ...

System model for calculating mine profitability

15 hours ago

A new system dynamic model makes it possible to plan the profitability of mining operations with greater precision than before. Researchers in business at Lappeenranta University of Technology, LUT have developed a model ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bcode
1 / 5 (1) Aug 07, 2012
To say nothing of the increased forest-fire risk created by the high levels of methane, in and around the trees.
plaasjaapie
Aug 07, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Claudius
1 / 5 (1) Aug 08, 2012
I am not sure why this is either a surprise or relevant. Whether the tree decays while it is dying or decays after it dies, seems irrelevant. Methane is released in any case. Is the implication that because the tree is still somewhat alive during the process that more methane is ultimately released?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.