Democracy works for Endangered Species Act, study finds

Aug 16, 2012

When it comes to protecting endangered species, the power of the people is key, an analysis of listings under the U.S. Endangered Species Act finds.

The journal Science is publishing the analysis comparing listings of "endangered" and "threatened" initiated by the U.S. Fish and , the agency that administers the , to those initiated by citizen petition.

"We found that citizens, on average, do a better job of picking species that are threatened than does the Fish and Wildlife Service. That's a really interesting and surprising finding," says co-author Berry Brosi, a biologist and professor of environmental studies at Emory University.

Brosi conducted the analysis with Eric Biber, a University of California, Berkeley School of who specializes in .

Controversy has surrounded the Act (ESA) since it became law nearly 40 years ago. A particular flashpoint is the provision that allows citizens to petition the (FWS) to list any unprotected species, and use litigation to challenge any FWS listing decision. Critics of this provision say the FWS wastes time and resources processing the stream of citizen requests. Another argument is that many citizen-initiated listings are driven less by concern for a species than by political motives, such as blocking a development project.

The study authors counter that their findings bolster the need to keep the public highly involved.

"There are some 100,000 species of in North America, and asking one federal agency to stay on top of that is tough," Biber says. "If there were restrictions on the number of citizen-initiated petitions being reviewed, the government would lose a whole universe of people providing high-quality information about species at risk, and it is likely that many species would be left unprotected."

The researchers built a database of the 913 domestic and freshwater species listed as "threatened" or "endangered" under the ESA from 1986 on. They examined whether citizens or the FWS initiated the petition, whether it was litigated, and whether it conflicted with an economic development project. They also looked at the level of biological threat to each of the species, using FWS threat scores in reports the agency regularly makes to Congress.

The results showed that listings resulting from citizen-initiated petitions are more likely to pose conflicts with development, but those species are also significantly more threatened, on average, than the species in FWS-initiated petitions.

"The overriding message is that citizen involvement really does work in combination with the oversight of the FWS," Brosi says. "It's a two-step system of checks and balances that is important to maintain."

The public brings diffuse and specialized expertise to the table, from devoted nature enthusiasts to scientists who have spent their whole careers studying one particular animal, insect or plant. Public involvement can also help counter the political pressure inherent in large development projects. The FWS, however, is unlikely to approve the listing of a species that is not truly threatened or endangered, so some petitions are filtered out.

"You could compare it to the trend of crowdsourcing that the Internet has spawned," Brosi says. "It's sort of like crowdsourcing what species need to be protected."

Many people associate the success of the ESA with iconic species like the bald eagle and the whooping crane.

"To me," Brosi says, "the greater accomplishment of the act is its protection of organisms that don't get the same amount of attention as a beautiful bird or mammal."

For example, the FWS turned down a petition to list the Mojave Desert population of the Desert Tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, but that decision was reversed. The Desert Tortoise is now in the ESA highest threat category, and populations of the entire species are thought to have declined by more than 90 percent during the past 20 years.

"One of the biggest threats it faces is urban and suburban expansion, which could have made it politically challenging for the FWS," Brosi notes. "And yet, the is a keystone species that helps support dozens of other species by creating habitats in its burrows and dispersing seeds."

Explore further: New model helps explain how provisions promote or reduce wildlife disease

Related Stories

Multiplying like bunnies? Not this jackrabbit

Jul 22, 2009

(AP) -- Rabbits are certainly known for their propensity to multiply, but one species of jackrabbit is having trouble keeping up. There are an estimated 150 white-sided jackrabbits left in the United States, and federal ...

Hundreds of threatened species not on official US list

Dec 12, 2011

Many of the animal species at risk of extinction in the United States have not made it onto the country's official Endangered Species Act (ESA) list, according to new research from the University of Adelaide.

Flies are given federal protection

May 11, 2006

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has extended federal protection to 12 species of Hawaiian picture-wing flies under the Endangered Species Act.

Endangered shortnose sturgeon saved in Hudson River

Jan 31, 2007

For the first time in U.S., and probably global, history a fish identified as endangered has been shown to have recovered -- and in the Hudson River, which flows through one of the world's largest population centers, New ...

Obama reverses Bush rule changes on endangered species

Mar 03, 2009

President Barack Obama on Tuesday restored rules requiring assessment by wildlife experts on the impact of government projects on endangered species, revoking the policy of the former Bush administration.

Recommended for you

Where have all the swallows gone?

14 hours ago

Extinction: the permanent loss of a species. It is deeply troubling—and scientists and birdwatchers are ringing the alarm about a bird species that only a few decades ago was widespread and very common.

Wildlife hospitals save 16,000 animals in four years

16 hours ago

Birds are the most commonly rescued wildlife in Queensland, with the laughing kookaburra among our hardiest species, according to new research from The University of Queensland's Gatton Campus.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1 / 5 (2) Aug 16, 2012
democracy = rule by the mob.

"Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for western civilization as it commits suicide"
nappy
3 / 5 (2) Aug 16, 2012
REgrdless of teh "reason" a bureaucracy is formed,it soon exists to serve itself without regard for its original "purpose". There is a reason there were no bureaucracies mentioned in the Constitution. They are not answerable to anyone and soon go out of control.
SatanLover
1 / 5 (1) Aug 16, 2012
democracy is about killing the lesser incomes. skill and intelligence has no role in this.
Caliban
not rated yet Aug 16, 2012
REgrdless of teh "reason" a bureaucracy is formed,it soon exists to serve itself without regard for its original "purpose". There is a reason there were no bureaucracies mentioned in the Constitution. They are not answerable to anyone and soon go out of control.


I would modify that statement to say that they tend to serve the interests of whoever or whatever is able to exert the most pressure/influence.

In the case of the ESA/FWS, concerned and usually pretty well informed citizens are excercising their rights. The only real controversy is that this tends to hamper corporate interests in their neverending quest for new profit centers whose "external" costs are, naturally, paid out of the public purse --one way or another.