The cosmic infrared background

Aug 13, 2012
The cosmic infrared background
A computer simulation of the development of giant filaments of galaxies in the very early universe. Recent observations of the cosmic infrared background, the remnant radiation from many of these stars, provides support for current cosmological models. Credit: Jenkins; ApJ

(Phys.org) -- The cosmic infrared background is the collective infrared radiation emitted by cosmic sources throughout the history of the universe, including sources inaccessible to current telescopes. The latter category, for example, includes the very first generation of stars, currently a subject of intense investigations. Because of the relative uniformity of this background, which is faint and might be interpreted as instrumental noise, fluctuations in it can often be more readily discerned than the actual background level itself. This property also lets astronomers discriminate against the significant foreground contributions from the solar system and our galaxy.

CfA astronomers Matt Ashby and Giovanni Fazio joined with four colleagues to use the superb sensitivity and stability of the (IRAC) on the to probe the . They worked with very deep IRAC images of the sky, over an area of about 0.2 square degrees, that had been taken in a different program designed to study more recently formed but still very distant galaxies.

After meticulously accounting for known stars, diffuse emission, and known galaxies, the scientists found large structural features (fluctuations) consistent with their having been produced by the first generation of stars dating from an epoch more than twelve billion years ago. These early stars, at least according to the best current models of cosmic evolution, were not uniformly distributed across space. They formed as part of stupendous, filamentary structures that evolved and grew from the tiny ripples in hot gas that pervaded the universe soon after the big bang. The results of this new paper lend support both to the current theory of the large scale structure of the universe and to our ideas about how the first generation stars formed.

Explore further: Toothpaste fluorine formed in stars

Related Stories

Galaxies in the young cosmos

May 21, 2012

(Phys.org) -- The universe was born about 13.7 billion years ago in the big bang. The Sun and its system of planets formed about five billion years ago. What happened, then, during that long, intervening stretch ...

Backgrounds

Jun 28, 2011

You’ve probably heard of the cosmic microwave background, but it doesn’t stop there. The as-yet-undetectable cosmic neutrino background is out there waiting to give us a view into the first seconds ...

Spitzer telescope finds first objects burned furiously

Jun 07, 2012

(Phys.org) -- The faint, lumpy glow given off by the very first objects in the universe may have been detected with the best precision yet, using NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope. These faint objects might be ...

'Big baby' galaxy found in newborn Universe

Sep 28, 2005

The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope have teamed up to 'weigh' the stars in distant galaxies. One of these galaxies is not only one of the most distant ever seen, but it appears to be unusually ...

Mysterious red galaxies

Dec 12, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Perhaps the most astonishing and revolutionary discovery in cosmology was Edwin Hubble's observation that galaxies are moving away from us with velocities that are proportional to their distances. ...

Recommended for you

Spectacular supernova's mysteries revealed

20 hours ago

(Phys.org) —New research by a team of UK and European-based astronomers is helping to solve the mystery of what caused a spectacular supernova in a galaxy 11 million light years away, seen earlier this ...

Supernova seen in two lights

21 hours ago

(Phys.org) —The destructive results of a mighty supernova explosion reveal themselves in a delicate blend of infrared and X-ray light, as seen in this image from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope and Chandra ...

Toothpaste fluorine formed in stars

Aug 21, 2014

The fluorine that is found in products such as toothpaste was likely formed billions of years ago in now dead stars of the same type as our sun. This has been shown by astronomers at Lund University in Sweden, ...

Swirling electrons in the whirlpool galaxy

Aug 20, 2014

The whirlpool galaxy Messier 51 (M51) is seen from a distance of approximately 30 million light years. This galaxy appears almost face-on and displays a beautiful system of spiral arms.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Karl Kognition
not rated yet Aug 13, 2012
Just a reminder? Or is this further confirmation? I don't see any new information here.
Satene
1.7 / 5 (6) Aug 13, 2012
You're right - the imprints of the "first generation of stars" were observed many years before with Spitzer telescope. I would be very careful to interpret it as a confirmation of Big Bang cosmology, though.
Ventilator
not rated yet Aug 13, 2012
I should think this would be helpful to others.

My reasoning is thus: without seeing the canvas, one cannot perceive the painting on it.

Basically, the UCMBR (Universal Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) is what we know to be the left over reverberations within the observable universe from the Big Bang (no matter the cause), supernovae, and early black holes.

What I want to know is what else contributes to it? It's like we're in a sea of radiation within the universe, and our little vessel (the heliosphere) seems to be bobbing along just fine.

I personally just hope we continue to observe, and develop better electromagnetic radiation shielding, once the two Voyager probes start to beam back the interstellar medium.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
3.9 / 5 (7) Aug 13, 2012
¨Nice!

@ KK:

The earlier results couldn't resolve and test for structure formation, as I understand it.

@ Satene:

Science denialist much, and why are you then commenting on science and in such a destructive fashion, making suggestions that are nonsense at best and can be misconstrued by others at worst? The scientists were not hesitating as declaring it as yet another successful test for standrad cosmology, which of course it is.
rah
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 13, 2012
So they "enhanced" a fuzzy spot and created a story to go with it. Egggcellent! Enhance more!
SatanLover
1 / 5 (3) Aug 13, 2012
enhance
enhance
enhance
enhance
enhance
enhance

ValeriaT
1.8 / 5 (5) Aug 13, 2012
The scientists were not hesitating as declaring it as yet another successful test for standard cosmology, which of course it is.
Of course? I don't see any evidence of standard cosmology here. Do you?