Research experiment suggests chimps don't punish third party bad behavior

August 28, 2012 by Bob Yirka report
Image: Wikipedia.

(—Researchers from the Max Planck institute have been conducting experiments with chimpanzees that appear to indicate that the apes are not willing to punish other chimps when witnessing them doing something "bad" but will do so if they are the injured party. The team has published their findings in the journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Punishing people who do wrong is a hallmark of the human race, most often done by people that were not even harmed by the egregious act. argue that this is one of the reasons that people have been able to build such large such as villages, towns and cities. But are other animals capable of such behavior, and if so, does it mean they are doing it for the same reasons? While the second question is almost impossible to test, researchers have been searching for examples of the first, and now, the group in Germany has been conducting experiments designed around chimpanzees, to see if they not only will step in when they witness one of their group doing wrong by another, but punish them for it given the chance.

In the experiment, three were placed in an enclosure where they could all see one another, and each was given a role; victim, thief and witness. Initially, the victim was shown how to cause some bit of food to drop down near them. The researchers then pulled on a rope that caused the victim to be able to access the food. At the same time, they also pulled on another rope that allowed the thief to turn the table, causing the food to be taken from the victim. The witness also had a rope and if yanked on, would cause a trapdoor to open taking the food away from the thief.

In testing thirteen chimps, the team found that the witness never once pulled the rope after watching the unjust act, to punish the , except when they themselves were the victim, indicating the team says, that simply don't care if another is cheated out of a meal.

Of course this is just one experiment, and while it suggests that chimps aren't the sort to punish some on behalf of others, it doesn't prove that chimps never would given the right set of circumstances. Also just because people do band together to punish offenders, it doesn't mean they do it out of a moral sense, it could be they are simply doing their best to avoid having the same crime committed against them in the future by others.

Explore further: Study: Chimps don't care about friends

More information: No third-party punishment in chimpanzees, PNAS, Published online before print August 27, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203179109

Punishment can help maintain cooperation by deterring free-riding and cheating. Of particular importance in large-scale human societies is third-party punishment in which individuals punish a transgressor or norm violator even when they themselves are not affected. Nonhuman primates and other animals aggress against conspecifics with some regularity, but it is unclear whether this is ever aimed at punishing others for noncooperation, and whether third-party punishment occurs at all. Here we report an experimental study in which one of humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), could punish an individual who stole food. Dominants retaliated when their own food was stolen, but they did not punish when the food of third-parties was stolen, even when the victim was related to them. Third-party punishment as a means of enforcing cooperation, as humans do, might therefore be a derived trait in the human lineage.

Related Stories

Study: Chimps don't care about friends

October 26, 2005

University of California-Los Angeles scientists say helping others is apparently a uniquely human habit -- or, at least, not a habit shared by chimpanzees.

Chimps found to be cooperative

March 4, 2006

In a series of experiments, researchers in Germany have found that chimpanzees work cooperatively to help each other accomplish a goal.

Survey: People know much about chimps

December 11, 2007

A Humane Society of the United States survey determined that people know more than they thought about chimpanzees, including the fact they are endangered.

Study shows chimps capable of insightful reasoning ability

June 10, 2011

( -- A new study conducted by researchers from the Max Planck Institute in Germany, with results published in PLoS ONE, shows that some apes are capable of using insightful reasoning to achieve goals. When presented ...

Humans like to work together in solving tasks, chimps don't

October 13, 2011

Recent studies have shown that chimpanzees possess many of the cognitive prerequisites necessary for humanlike collaboration. Cognitive abilities, however, might not be all that differs between chimpanzees and humans when ...

Recommended for you

Study suggests fish can experience 'emotional fever'

November 25, 2015

(—A small team of researchers from the U.K. and Spain has found via lab study that at least one type of fish is capable of experiencing 'emotional fever,' which suggests it may qualify as a sentient being. In their ...

New gene map reveals cancer's Achilles heel

November 25, 2015

Scientists have mapped out the genes that keep our cells alive, creating a long-awaited foothold for understanding how our genome works and which genes are crucial in disease like cancer.

How cells in the developing ear 'practice' hearing

November 25, 2015

Before the fluid of the middle ear drains and sound waves penetrate for the first time, the inner ear cells of newborn rodents practice for their big debut. Researchers at Johns Hopkins report they have figured out the molecular ...

How cells 'climb' to build fruit fly tracheas

November 25, 2015

Fruit fly windpipes are much more like human blood vessels than the entryway to human lungs. To create that intricate network, fly embryonic cells must sprout "fingers" and crawl into place. Now researchers at The Johns Hopkins ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.5 / 5 (4) Aug 28, 2012
Also just because people do band together to punish offenders, it doesn't mean they do it out of a moral sense, it could be they are simply doing their best to avoid having the same crime committed against them in the future by others.

One could argue that it's a mix of both, since there are people who will want to punish others even though the 'crime' could never happen to themselves (e.g. punishing others for being gay).

Altough on a more abstract level that could be considered a crime against the punishing person, because such an act draws their values into doubt. Having drawn ones values into doubt is a crime to some - certainly it makes some people feel bad (about themselves). So maybe they do feel that others being gay is a crime against them personally.

(or just substitute 'gay' with 'drawing cartoons of Mohammed' if you like. People have such screwed up sensibilities at times.)
not rated yet Aug 28, 2012
The primatologist Frans de Waal was, to my surprise, a bit wary of this result in another article. He notes that it is notoriously difficult to trigger behavior.

Also, there is no human comparison as of yet. As I remember it, the group was going to go back and make a repeat with children.

Simple modified traits (punishing 3d person) is more likely to be shared than not. We will see.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2012
How did they know the chimps didn't understand the situation and modify their behavior accordingly?
not rated yet Aug 28, 2012
Humans can watch others bullying for years and do nothing, or more likely join the bully...
I would be careful to put us up on a pedestal just yet.
1 / 5 (2) Aug 28, 2012
Humans could take a lesson. No cops. Everyone takes care of their own problems.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.