Banks' cash stash: No shield against bankruptcy

Aug 09, 2012

Imposing minimal capital levels for banks is like attempting to solve a complex jigsaw puzzle with a poorly fitting piece that could lead to even greater chaos.

According to João da Cruz and Pedro Lind from Lisbon University, Portugal, imposing minimum capital levels for banks may not prevent the insolvency of a minority of banks from triggering a widespread banking system collapse. In a study recently published in European Physical Journal B, the researchers explain why this measure could instead lead to larger crises.

The authors created a model of banks' behaviour to assess the conditions needed to avoid "avalanches" of insolvent banks. Their model is based on a physical system of particles representing how banks are attracted to each other in order to exchange 'economic energy'. Then they applied to these particles the credit risk model Merton-Vasicek as theoretical framework for bank stability. They then applied the credit risk models used as the theoretical foundation for bank stability, known as the Merton-Vasicek model, to these particles.

The authors observed that the insolvency results in a break of all the bank's connections. As a result, it affects the 'economic energy' of all its neighbours. Due to the interplay between banks, the effect of a single insolvency is thus capable of triggering an avalanche in the banking system.

The authors showed that under an increase in the minimum capital level, the risk of large crashes is only reduced if the number of banks in the system remains fixed. As a result, their levels of business will drop. However, it is more realistic that banks will adjust to preserve their current levels of business and start forming new links with other banks. Indeed, the crucial factor for ' growth is the ability of forming new links.

The authors conclude that rising capital requirements could have the opposite effect of making large avalanches, and therefore larger crises, more probable.

Explore further: 'Moral victories' might spare you from losing again

More information: The dynamics of financial stability in complex networks (2012). J. P. da Cruz, P.G. Lind, European Physical Journal B; DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2012-20984-6

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Bailed-out banks issued riskier loans

Sep 15, 2011

Banks that received federal bailout money ended up approving riskier loans and shifting capital toward risky investments after getting government help, say University of Michigan researchers.

Crises lead banks to operate more opportunistically

Sep 21, 2009

Financial crises place significant strain on banks, causing them to behave more opportunistically than clients are accustomed to. Business clients should count on this, according to Uppsala University business economist Kristina ...

Mortgage crisis: Blame the bank?

Aug 27, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Banks have played a big role in the mortgage crisis, not only because they issued loans to suspect borrowers, but because many originated and sold bad loans to other lenders, says a University of Michigan ...

Shocks and Stress Tests

Aug 21, 2007

In response to federal banking regulators' concern about community banks' increased participation in commercial real-estate lending, a University of Arkansas researcher has developed a system that allows banks to perform ...

Recommended for you

A word in your ear, but make it snappy

16 hours ago

To most, crocodiles conjure images of sharp teeth, powerful jaws and ferocious, predatory displays – but they are certainly not famous for their hearing abilities. However, this could all change, as new ...

Understanding the economics of human trafficking

17 hours ago

Although Europe is one of the strictest regions in the world when it comes to guaranteeing the respect of human rights, the number of people trafficked to or within the EU still amounts to several hundred ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
not rated yet Aug 09, 2012
Garbage. If US banks take deposits, then they should only be able to loan those deposits to the best of their abilities. Those deposits should be covered by the Federal Insurance program.
If entities who are banks but also gamblers in other realms should divest themselves of banking... that is taking deposits... and gain thier funding through other means, such as stock offerings, borrowing and enticing investors. BTW, any borrowing may not be from domestic banks under the FDIC rules. Let the fat cats gamble with their own money, not ours.