Study shows increased aggression between evenly matched teams

Aug 16, 2012 by Bob Yirka report

(Phys.org) -- Over the years, research has shown that when two people, or animals, are evenly matched opponents, both tend to resort to more savagery to win than if one is clearly superior to the other. Now new research by a team in the Netherlands has shown that the same appears to be true for groups, or teams of people engaged in sports. In a study, the researchers found, as they describe in their paper published in the journal Biology Letters, when two teams are evenly matched, they tend to resort to more illegal tactics resulting in more penalties, than do players on teams that are not so evenly matched.

The researchers, led by Gert Stulp of the psychology department at the University of Groningen, looked at two sports, football (aka soccer) and American basketball (the NBA). The first study group was made up of teams in the German Bundesliga soccer division. To come up with a way of defining parity of , the team used what they refer to as Resource Holding Potential (RHP) which was derived by looking at past success. The closer two teams were in RHP, the closer they were in skill levels, thus it could be used as a measure of teams when playing together.

After looking at statistics for 1,530 matches over a five year span, the researchers found a clear pattern developing. Average fouls overall were 38.76 per match. When the teams were close in rank, however, the number jumped to 39.15, compared to a low of 34.2 when really good teams played really bad ones. What’s perhaps more revealing however were stats for more serious fouls, those that occur when a player does something intentionally that might result in an injury to the other player. For teams with nearly equal RHP skill levels, 4.3 cards were issued per match, versus just 3.57 for unmatched teams, suggesting that resorting to more aggressive tendencies seems to be the norm when teams are very evenly matched.

In the study, the researchers found nearly identical patterns, and thus assert that not only do people resort to more aggressive tendencies when two individuals compete (or fight), but they do so as well when operating as a team. The results overall show, they say, that not only do grow more aggressive and/or violent when playing equally matched , but that their behavior can be predicted due to general tendencies.

Explore further: Study reveals drivers of Western consumers' readiness to eat insects

More information: Increased aggression during human group contests when competitive ability is more similar, Biology Letters, Published online before print August 15, 2012, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0591

Abstract
Theoretical analyses and empirical studies have revealed that conflict escalation is more likely when individuals are more similar in resource-holding potential (RHP). Conflicts can also occur between groups, but it is unknown whether conflicts also escalate more when groups are more similar in RHP. We tested this hypothesis in humans, using data from two professional sports competitions: football (the Bundesliga, the German first division of football) and basketball (the NBA, the North American National Basketball Association). We defined RHP based on the league ranks of the teams involved in the competition (i.e. their competitive ability) and measured conflict escalation by the number of fouls committed. We found that in both sports the number of fouls committed increased when the difference in RHP was smaller. Thus, we provide what is to our best knowledge the first evidence that, as in conflicts between individuals, conflicts escalate more when groups are more similar in RHP.

Related Stories

Weight, height, and experience key to Rugby World Cup success

Feb 20, 2012

Rugby teams with the tallest backs, heaviest forwards, and greatest amount of collective experience are likely to be the most successful at World Cup level, reveals research published online in the British Journal of Sports Me ...

Best Team Not Guaranteed World Cup Success

Jun 11, 2010

The World Cup offers fans of the globe's most popular sport the chance to thrill and agonize over the ups and downs of their nations' teams. For scientists, whether or not they are fans, it's another chance ...

Big playoffs don't mean big payoffs

May 04, 2011

Two of Boston’s professional sports teams — the Celtics and the Bruins — have reached the second round of their league playoffs for the third consecutive season. We asked John Kwoka, Neal F. ...

Recommended for you

Team defines new biodiversity metric

23 hours ago

To understand how the repeated climatic shifts over the last 120,000 years may have influenced today's patterns of genetic diversity, a team of researchers led by City College of New York biologist Dr. Ana ...

Danish museum discovers unique gift from Charles Darwin

Aug 29, 2014

The Natural History Museum of Denmark recently discovered a unique gift from one of the greatest-ever scientists. In 1854, Charles Darwin – father of the theory of evolution – sent a gift to his Danish ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (2) Aug 16, 2012
Peace through strength and superior firepower is validated.
ValeriaT
1 / 5 (1) Aug 16, 2012
It's known, the wars occur mostly between countries which differ with their power (although these very small ones are annexed in quiet too). A similar effect can be observed inside of mixture of bubbles and/or droplets, where larger objects expanding into account of these smaller ones. An equally sized dispersions are conditionally stable.
LED Guy
not rated yet Aug 17, 2012
Wow, when teams were evenly matched the average fouls jumped by 0.4/game!!!!!! Why bother even mentioning that when the average was alomst 39 (increase of ~1%).

The real result is for the cards (serious fouls). Here the increase was about 20%.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Aug 17, 2012
In the NBA study, the researchers found nearly identical patterns, and thus assert that not only do people resort to more aggressive tendencies when two individuals compete (or fight), but they do so as well when operating as a team.

Seems reasonable. There are always many strategies at your disposal. So you select (intuitively or consciously) the ones that are the least risky first - which are the non-aggressive strategies. Especially if opponents aren't evenly matched such strategies will lead to 'easy victory' (or at least will not lead to extermination beyond the assured defeat for the weaker entity)

In evenly matched entities those strategies won't lead to any clear advantage, so you have to start altering the playing field
Aggression is aimed at taking away abilities from the opponent but the risk of retaliation is high.