When the world ended in ice

Jul 03, 2012
A classic map of the ice lobe that covered the New York metro area until the end of the last ice age. (R.D. Salisbury, 1902)

(Phys.org) -- A mile or so of glacial ice covering much of North America and plowing down from the north once terminated in the New York metropolitan area, at a front stretching roughly from exit 13 on the New Jersey Turnpike (Rahway), on across southern Staten Island, the Bensonhurst neighborhood of Brooklyn, and northeastward through Long Island. But exactly when that ice started to seriously melt has long been an enigma.

Depending on methodology, geologists have estimated 21,000 to 28,000 years ago–a range that does not seem to match records of sea-level rise and other oceanographic indicators, which place the turning point more recently, at maybe 17,000 years. Knowing the timing is important, because it applies to how the ocean, atmosphere and ice might interact today during the increasingly rapid melting of glaciers farther north.

Now, a group of researchers at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory says they have found evidence that the more recent date is right. Led by geochemist Dorothy Peteet, the group analyzed plant microfossils that they removed in cores drilled into the bottoms of more than a dozen lakes and bogs in the region. These cores suggest that vegetation did not appear around Connecticut, New York’s Hudson Valley, northern New Jersey and southeastern Pennsylvania until just 15,000 or 16,000 years ago. The absence until then suggests that ice still covered the landscape, or at the very least that temperatures were still so cold, plants could not survive. Their study appears in the latest issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

“The history of the retreat of the southeastern margin [of the continental ice sheet] is particularly relevant today as Greenland warms and meltwater enters the North Atlantic,” say the authors. The Greenland sheet is now melting much faster than most researchers thought possible, and some say it is on the verge of reaching a tipping point of rapid dissolution.
Many scientists, including Peteet, believe that some initial melting did take place some 20,000-plus years ago. However, that introduced a huge pulse of fresh meltwater into the Atlantic Ocean–an event that then shut down currents bringing up heat from the south,and thus threw the north back into a temporary deep freeze. According to this scenario, 5,000 years or so later, the melting picked up steam again–exactly when Peteet’s study concludes it did.
 
Peteet (who also has an appointment at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies) and her colleagues are continuing their work, with coring trips planned later this summer to forests and wetlands in New York City’s Jamaica Bay; Highpoint, N.J.; and Black Rock Forest in the Hudson Valley.

Explore further: Scientists detect evidence of 'oceans worth' of water in Earth's mantle

More information: www.agu.org/journals/gl/gl1211… 884/2012GL051884.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Longest-lived animals reveal climate change secrets

Jun 13, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Researchers at Bangor University have used some of the world’s longest-lived animals to look at how the North Atlantic Ocean has affected our climate over the past 1,000 years. 

Hot, Humid Weather Could Affect Asthma Sufferers

Jul 21, 2011

The Tristate has experienced a stint of heat waves this summer which have not only included high temperatures but also high humidity that has made the air feel like a perpetual sauna.

Recommended for you

Checking the first data from OCO-2

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —On July 2, NASA successfully launched its first satellite dedicated to measuring carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) mission—operated by NASA's ...

Canada to push Arctic claim in Europe

14 hours ago

Canada's top diplomat will discuss the Arctic with his Scandinavian counterparts in Denmark and Norway next week, it was announced Thursday, a trip that will raise suspicions in Russia.

Severe drought is causing the western US to rise

19 hours ago

The severe drought gripping the western United States in recent years is changing the landscape well beyond localized effects of water restrictions and browning lawns. Scientists at Scripps Institution of ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 03, 2012
Damn few ice sheets left, of any size, north of Manhattan. Why worry, it's been ice free in the past? As well as ice covered. Both conditions are normal.

The only abnormalities are the men trying to make money, gain power, or political advantage, by demagoguing a normal variation in climate. Frightening the rubes should be an executable offense.
gromm1t2
1 / 5 (1) Jul 03, 2012
Speaking of rubes..... And what to do with them
rubberman
not rated yet Jul 03, 2012
Damn few ice sheets left, of any size, north of Manhattan. Why worry, it's been ice free in the past? As well as ice covered. Both conditions are normal.

Personally, I worry because of the speed at which the world is transitioning...I think there are a few others worried about this as well. Then there are those like yourself who don't appear to be too concerned...I shoulda taken the blue pill.

The only abnormalities are the men trying to make money, gain power, or political advantage, by demagoguing a normal variation in climate. Frightening the rubes should be an executable offense.


Since when is any of that which is mentioned above abnormal? Also, most rubes aren't scared, they're pissed...read the world news.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (2) Jul 03, 2012
The worry is *precisely* because it isn't "normal" but man made, observes the climate scientists.

And it is in fact abnormally rapid (which even denialists can see whether the reject the rest of the science or not), so it can have new effects on the biosphere never seen before. But mostly it is avoidable at low cost, will cost much else, and has moral implications as it already hits people. (Say, a few dead in US under the current seasonal extreme.)

Science denialist comments are either "ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)". You can as well deny that a hammer works as that science works or that a nail were driven as that climate forcings are established - both are tools.