Controlling uncertainty: Why do consumers need to believe in certain service providers?

Jul 17, 2012

Consumers evaluate services and make decisions based on the level of uncertainty associated with a product—the greater the uncertainty, the more likely it is they will need to have faith in a company and focus on its unique offerings, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"Some services can be evaluated with actual experience, whereas other services are difficult to evaluate even with experience—they have to be taken on faith. Services taken on faith are more difficult to evaluate, and are usually perceived to have greater and higher risks associated with them," write authors Jin Sun (University of International Business and Economics, China), Hean Tat Keh (University of Queensland), and Angela Y. Lee (Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University).

Most products can be evaluated by actual experience. But this is not always true for services. For example, when you are buying a product such as a car, you can take it out for a test drive before making the purchase. But when deciding on a service such as surgery, it is impossible to get a trial operation before deciding on a surgeon; consumers must rely on more nebulous features such as reputation.

The authors found that tend to on unique features only when they are evaluating services based on faith and it is the greater uncertainty associated with this type of service relative to services based on experience that undermines consumer confidence and in turn increases the focus on unique versus standard attributes.

" providers such as retail banks should focus on improving features that can easily be compared with their competitors. For example, staying open longer or offering more competitive interest rates. As for services such as those provided by insurance companies, the best strategy would be to create innovative and distinctive such as personalized consulting services," the authors conclude.

Explore further: Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

More information: Jin Sun, Hean Tat Keh, and Angela Y. Lee. "The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Service Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty." Journal of Consumer Research: December 2012.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Early product launches: How will consumers respond?

Apr 19, 2011

A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research explains why consumers often indicate they are willing to pay more for a product that is not yet available—but are reluctant to pay that price when the product is ultima ...

Recommended for you

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

17 hours ago

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
not rated yet Jul 18, 2012
Economist philosopher N. N. Taleb writes on the probabilities and consequences of unique events.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jul 18, 2012
Service providers such as retail banks should focus on improving features that can easily be compared with their competitors.

Which they (and any other business) really tries hard not to do. If you are comparable then you have competition (which drives down profit margins). Why does anyone think we have laptops, notebooks, subnotebooks, netbooks, etc.?
Open up a new label and you can call yourself 'leader' in that field immediately. But try to sell something with the power of a netbook as a "small but very low capability notebook" and you will fail. The entire ad industry works on that principle.

As for evaluating unknown issuesaccording to singular properties (e.g. reputation of the surgeon): That isn't too surprising. If that singular propetry is already of uncertain value in evaluating quality of product then using (many) more such properties isn't going to give you more information - especially since you don't also don't know how to weigh them against one another.