Three-city patent court gets nod from EU leaders

Jul 03, 2012 by Nancy Owano report

(Phys.org) -- A one-stop panEuropean patent court system with functions divided among three cities is now in the wings, bringing Europe a new day for a single European patent system. After a decision left dangling over arguments over which country should house the court, EU leaders reached their decision on Friday at a council meeting to just spread the activities among three European centers. In March last year, ministers from 25 member states made plans to introduce a common system for registering patents, without Spain and Italy, which opposed the plan.

As of Friday, the last outstanding issue, where would the seat of the Unified Patent be, was finally put to rest. UK, France and will be the three court sites as announced at the summit of EU leaders in Brussels. Accordingly, London, Paris, and Munich are to serve as the “unified” court’s three cities.

Paris has been proposed as the central division, the "seat." Specific areas of focus have been parceled out to London and Munich.The Paris court will be called the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court, and its president will be French. French President François Hollande told a news conference there were no winners or losers. "What took place was a compromise.” London will hear cases on chemistry including pharmaceuticals and life sciences. Munich will take on a focus on mechanical engineering.

While divided into three parts, the “unified” court is a one-stop shop for patents to be granted in a single place, in that the patent will be valid across 25 countries. This marks an important change as inventors will now be able to file for protection in 25 of the EU’s 27 states, reducing processing time and translation costs.

European proponents of a unified court have championed the idea of a single patent system as one of the most immediate steps the EU can take to step up innovation and alleviate business costs. The idea has also been promoted as a way to advance Europe closer to the front lines of global competition.

Michel Barnier, the EU's internal market and services commissioner, said that Europe is behind the United States and China in the number of patents granted and the new rules, once in place, will reassert Europe's competitiveness.

According to the European Patent Office, registration costs could be reduced, because inventors would avoid the need to register and defend their ideas in several countries and languages. Under the present system, European are filed in one nation but then granted separately by others, with fees and translations costs associated with each approval.

The European Parliament is expected to approve when it votes on Wednesday, July 4. The first “single patent” is expected to be registered in 2014.

Some critics protest that there may be big costs ahead, however, for small businesses who will have to travel to wherever the appropriate court is. What is more, there has always been a universal complaint heard in the U.S. and that patent systems place low-budget inventors without ample resources to enter the fray of expensive and complex patent litigation at an unfair disadvantage.

As for the Friday announcement and anticipated Wednesday vote, though, many advocates of the unified court express similar hopes that the new court system will result in easier transactions and greater incentives for scientists.

Explore further: 2012 movie massacre hung over 'Interview' decision

Related Stories

Single euro patent battle hits legal buffer

Mar 08, 2011

A decades-long battle to allow companies to register patents just once across the single European market suffered a major setback Tuesday with a damaging EU court judgment.

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Google signs deal to translate European patents

Nov 30, 2010

(AP) -- Google announced an agreement Tuesday to use its technology to translate patents into 29 European languages, a deal officials hope will smooth the way toward a simplified European patent system after ...

US Supreme Court hears Microsoft case on patents

Apr 19, 2011

The US Supreme Court has immersed itself in patent rules in a case pitting Microsoft against a Canadian technology company that claims some versions of Word violated its patent.

Recommended for you

2012 movie massacre hung over 'Interview' decision

10 hours ago

When a group claiming credit for the hacking of Sony Pictures Entertainment threated violence against theaters showing "The Interview" earlier this week, the fate of the movie's big-screen life was all but ...

Clooney slams skittish Hollywood after Sony hack

17 hours ago

Film star George Clooney slammed the Hollywood movie industry for failing to stand up against the cyber threats that prompted Sony Pictures to cancel release of the movie "The Interview."

Atos shares soar after Xerox acquisition

20 hours ago

Shares in French tech firm Atos soared nearly five percent on Friday as traders cheered the news it had bought the IT wing of Xerox for more than $1 billion.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Jul 03, 2012
It's a good idea to parcel this up by areas of application (if they have to parcel it up at all, which seemed inevitable in this case). This way it won't come to such things as "Munich is too tough for my patent application, so I'll take it to Paris"

Some critics protest that there may be big costs ahead, however, for small businesses who will have to travel to wherever the appropriate court is.

If one court can decide for all countries then that will save them a lot of money.
Translation into multiple languages and applications in all countries can easily go into the 100k Euros range. Travlling to Paris fo a day or two will only cost a fraction of that.
the 'low budget' investors would not have been able to afford a european wide patent under the old system anyhow.
Husky
not rated yet Jul 03, 2012
...but can the low budgetters still get national patent in their own country, in that case there is no loss for them, other than the risks they already had from of over the border copycats...
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Jul 03, 2012
In todays' economy there's really no point in getting a purely national patent. That wouldn't even protect you from national copycats (as they'd simply produce the stuff just beyond the border). Especially in Europe that would usually just mean relocating a few hundred kilometers.
LuckyExplorer
not rated yet Jul 04, 2012
"Munich is too tough for my patent application, so I'll take it to Paris"

...and if Paris is too tough, take it to US, one of the main markets

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.