The greatest climate change the world has seen in the last 100,000 years was the transition from the ice age to the warm interglacial period. New research from the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen indicates that, contrary to previous opinion, the rise in temperature and the rise in the atmospheric CO2 follow each other closely in terms of time. The results have been published in the scientific journal, Climate of the Past.
In the warmer climate the atmospheric content of CO2 is naturally higher. The gas CO2 (carbon dioxide) is a green-house gas that absorbs heat radiation from the Earth and thus keeps the Earth warm. In the shift between ice ages and interglacial periods the atmospheric content of CO2 helps to intensify the natural climate variations.
It had previously been thought that as the temperature began to rise at the end of the ice age approximately 19,000 years ago, an increase in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere followed with a delay of up to 1,000 years.
"Our analyses of ice cores from the ice sheet in Antarctica shows that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere follows the rise in Antarctic temperatures very closely and is staggered by a few hundred years at most," explains Sune Olander Rasmussen, Associate Professor and centre coordinator at the Centre for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.
The research, which was carried out in collaboration with researchers from the University of Tasmania in Australia, is based on measurements of ice cores from five boreholes through the ice sheet in Antarctica. The ice sheet is formed by snow that doesn't melt, but remains year after year and is gradually compressed into kilometers thick ice. During the compression, air is trapped between the snowflakes and as a result the ice contains tiny samples of ancient atmospheres. The composition of the ice also shows what the temperature was when the snow fell, so the ice is an archive of past climate and atmospheric composition.
"The ice cores show a nearly synchronous relationship between the temperature in Antarctica and the atmospheric content of CO2, and this suggests that it is the processes in the deep-sea around Antarctica that play an important role in the CO2 increase," explains Sune Olander Rasmussen.
He explains that one of the theories is that when Antarctica warms up, there will be stronger winds over the Southern Ocean and the winds pump more water up from the deep bottom layers in the ocean where there is a high content of CO2 from all of the small organisms that die and fall down to the sea floor and rot. When strong winds blow over the Southern Ocean, the ocean circulation brings more of the CO2-rich bottom water up to the surface and a portion of this CO2 is released into the atmosphere. This process links temperature and CO2 together and the new results suggest that the linking is closer and happens faster than previously believed.
Climatic impact
The global temperature changed naturally because of the changing solar radiation caused by variations in the Earth's orbit around the Sun, the Earth's tilt and the orientation of the Earth's axis. These are called the Milankowitch cycles and occur in periods of approximately 100,000, 42,000, and 22,000 years. These are the cycles that cause the Earth's climate to shift between long ice ages of approximately 100,000 years and warm interglacial periods, typically 10,000 15,000 years. The natural warming of the climate was intensified by the increased amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
"What we are observing in the present day is the mankind has caused the CO2 content in the atmosphere to rise as much in just 150 years as it rose over 8,000 years during the transition from the last ice age to the current interglacial period and that can bring the Earth's climate out of balance," explains Sune Olander Rasmussen adding "That is why it is even more important that we have a good grip on which processes caused the climate of the past to change, because the same processes may operate in addition to the anthropogenic changes we see today. In this way the climate of the past helps us to understand how the various parts of the climate systems interact and what we can expect in the future."
Explore further:
Ice cores map dynamics of sudden climate changes
More information:
www.clim-past.net/8/1213/2012/cp-8-1213-2012.html

Birger
3.7 / 5 (9) Jul 23, 2012But the urgency will be dismissed by the denialbots.
randith
2.1 / 5 (11) Jul 23, 2012CuriousMan
3 / 5 (10) Jul 23, 2012But temperatures are a side effect. Please explain the 20 percent increase in CO2 since measurements begain in the lte 50's.
Vendicar_Decarian
2.6 / 5 (10) Jul 23, 2012Yet the Globe continues to warm.
Howhot
4 / 5 (4) Jul 24, 2012Another point is how rapidly the temperature responds to CO2 changes. I think it shows how urgent it is for modern man to get a handle on all CO2 emissions.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (6) Jul 24, 2012And the Globe continues to cool.
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
Howhot
4.3 / 5 (6) Jul 24, 2012Your delusional!
Let's here it from the horses mouth:
http://www.youtub...Gh89bvp0
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) Jul 24, 2012This article is nothing more than an attempt by "scientists" to smudge the two data sets together, 'cause they can't explain the discrepancy of CO2 rising after, and not before, temperature increases.
They don't even discuss how long it takes atmospheric samples to become trapped, or any of the other problems associated with ice core data.
Here's an article that might open your eyes a little (but I doubt you'll read it):
http://tucsonciti...dioxide/
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2012Indeed:
"The new book ...will also reflect his new opinion that global warming has not occurred as he had expected.
The problem is we dont know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books mine included because it looked clear-cut, but it hasnt happened, (James) Lovelock said.
The climate is doing its usual tricks. Theres nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now, he said.
The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising -- carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that, he added."
http://worldnews....e-change
Howhot
4 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2012And just how sure are you of that? The problem with that, is that it's wrong. You deniers keep ignoring the fact that CO2 is a major green house gas. A very effective green house gas too. Are you just going to put blinders on and ignore the hundreds gigatons of carbon dioxide mankind has pushed into the atmosphere?
CO2 that is not normally 400ppm. Nothing like this CO2 rise has ever occurred in earths history. Not in 50 years. I don't even think a comet strike could kick up as much CO2 into the atmosphere as man has done with fossil fuels.
So lets listen to Michael Mann, the father of the Hockey stick deniers hate so so much.
http://www.youtub...Gh89bvp0
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2012Apparently then, you DIDN'T read the article.
No, it's not.
Yes.
So?
Sure it can. Try doing a little fact checking before you spout.
"the K-T impact, raising CO2 to ~1700-6500 ppm;"
http://www.counte...0212.pdf
Why? He was wrong.
Howhot
4 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2012Yeah, and here are the facts; in arctic ice, warmer temperatures allow the capture of more CO2 in the ICE. That is just saturation limits of the chemistry. You will also notice, that the authors of the article state;
What it shows is in the past, temperatures and CO2 levels where pretty normal. That's it with respect to Anthropogenic global warming as we are experiencing now. If you want to compare the heat trapping capabilities of an atmosphere with 400ppmv vs 260ppmv, I think you will have to agree that 400ppmv has a heat trapping capability much higher.
From the article, with 200ppmv vs 260ppmv, you might see a response just as you see in the 14-15 x-axis range of the graph in the article. Interesting
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) Jul 25, 2012Then why, as the CO2 has risen from 365ppm to <395ppm,...
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
...has the temperature decreased?
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
Howhot
4.2 / 5 (5) Jul 25, 2012Well ubavontuba, for one thing, from the solar input, Earth's temperature should be decreasing. The scary part for mankind, is it is not. While global average temperatures have only increased ~1.1C since say 1950, in the upper northern and southern hemispheres that change is much more dramatic. I recall in the arctic it was more like ~4C. You can't attribute that kind of increase to a lower solar flux input. That just doesn't make sense, does it?
Don't show me woods from forests 1998. Thats just BS and you know it. In fact it's a dishonest republican ploy politicians love to use.
Right now the CO2 concentration is 400ppmv. How do you think that will be recorded in the ice sheets of the Antarctic? When do you think the 400ppmv CO2 bubbles will be trapped? It will certainly lag temperature in the ice core, but not by much, just as the article states.
the K-T impact, cool.
RazorsEdge
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2012Howhot
5 / 5 (3) Jul 27, 2012And yours will be getting dinner to eat from the D4 droughts in the central USA.
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Jul 28, 2012He is using hadcrut3 which is an outdated temperature data set that omits large areas of the poles - which are the areas of the globe warming most rapidly.
Hadcrut 4 adds more of the polar regions to it's average and here is the result...
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
"And the Globe continues to cool." - UbVonTard
Now UbVonTard has been caught telling the same lie of omission over and over and over again. Literally dozens of times.
When he is posting under his alternative name "ParkerTard" he also repeated the same lie over and over again.
He is mentally diseased of course.
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Jul 28, 2012Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an ExxonMobil-funded thinktank with close links to the Bush administration, offered the payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study
http://www.guardi...techange
"The only urgency is getting another grant to live on." - RazorsTard
Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2012You are a congenital liar.
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
As has been repeatedly shown.
"Then why, as the CO2 has risen from 365ppm to <395 ppm,... has the temperature decreased?" - Ubvontard
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2012But no matter. Even HadCRUT4 shows slight cooling for the past 10 years (even though the last year and a half are missing!).
http://www.woodfo...02/trend
And indeed, the Globe continues to cool...
Now VendiTard has been caught telling the same lie of omission over and over and over again. Literally dozens of times.
He is mentally diseased, of course.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (4) Jul 28, 2012You are a congenital liar (whatever that means).
As has been repeatedly shown:
HadCRUT4 data ends in late 2010. As this data was specifically developed to "prove" global warming, one wonders why it's so difficult to update? Perhaps they've come upon an inescapable data cliff?
But no matter. Even HadCRUT4 shows slight cooling for the past 10 years (even though the last year and a half are missing!).
http://www.woodfo...02/trend
Get a clue.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2012Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012Then we can use another data set that captures the entire globe.
http://www.woodfo...97/trend
Poor UbvonTard. He just can't stop lying.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012But a slight warming over the last 8 years.
http://www.woodfo...04/trend
Even a higher rate of warming over the last 5 years...
http://www.woodfo...07/trend
And over the last 22 years....
http://www.woodfo...90/trend
And over the last 32 years - the minimum time span over which climate is defined.
http://www.woodfo...80/trend
Poor UbvonTard/ParkerTard. He just can't seen to post anything without telling a lie.
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Jul 29, 2012"And here I've been doing it for FREE" - UbVonTard
Your mommy must be so proud.
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Jul 29, 2012http://www.woodfo...rom:2000
"HadCRUT4 data ends in late 2010. As this data was specifically developed to "prove" global warming, one wonders why it's so difficult to update?" - UbvonTard/ParkerTard
http://www.youtub...2Tflw9BE
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Jul 29, 2012But a slight warming over the last 8 years.
http://www.woodfo...04/trend
Poor UbVonTard/ParkerTard. His mental disease is terminal.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012Q: Why does the data set end in 2010?
A: The paper describing the HadCRUT4 data set was submitted in 2011 and 2010 was the final complete year of data available at the time. Regular updates will follow...
http://www.metoff...faq.html
Sadly, UbVonTard/ParkerTard's mental disease is terminal.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012http://www.woodfo...02/trend
Hmm... same result as before.
Poor VendiTard. He just can't stop lying.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012HadCRUT4 data ends in late 2010. As this data was specifically developed to "prove" global warming, one wonders why it's so difficult to update? Perhaps they've come upon an inescapable data cliff?
But no matter. Even HadCRUT4 shows slight cooling for the past 10 years (even though the last year and a half are missing!).
http://www.woodfo...02/trend
But HadCRUT3 (a current data set) shows over all cooling since 1998:
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
Poor VendiTard. He just can't seen to post anything without telling a lie.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012http://www.woodfo...02/trend
But the long-held worldwide temperature standard HadCRUT3 shows cooling since the end of 1997:
http://www.woodfo...98/trend
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012Poor VendiTard. His mental disease appears terminal.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2012Following the links from your reference to the CRUTEM4 data we find:
"Data are available for each month from January 1850 to December 2010, ...We are in the process of updating CRUTEM4 to include data following December 2010, and will soon begin monthly updates of the dataset. Recent temperature data is available in the CRUTEM3 dataset. ...Last updated: 25/01/2012"
So in more than six months, they couldn't keep their promise to update HadCRUT4, and even they state to use HadCRUT3 data, instead!
http://www.metoff...crutem4/
Sadly, VendiTard's mental disease appears terminal.