(Phys.org) -- UCLA researchers have developed a new transparent solar cell that is an advance toward giving windows in homes and other buildings the ability to generate electricity while still allowing people to see outside. Their study appears in the journal ACS Nano.
The UCLA team describes a new kind of polymer solar cell (PSC) that produces energy by absorbing mainly infrared light, not visible light, making the cells nearly 70% transparent to the human eye. They made the device from a photoactive plastic that converts infrared light into an electrical current.
"These results open the potential for visibly transparent polymer solar cells as add-on components of portable electronics, smart windows and building-integrated photovoltaics and in other applications," said study leader Yang Yang, a UCLA professor of materials science and engineering, who also is director of the Nano Renewable Energy Center at California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI).
Yang added that there has been intense world-wide interest in so-called polymer solar cells. "Our new PSCs are made from plastic-like materials and are lightweight and flexible," he said. "More importantly, they can be produced in high volume at low cost."
Polymer solar cells have attracted great attention due to their advantages over competing solar cell technologies. Scientists have also been intensely investigating PSCs for their potential in making unique advances for broader applications. Several such applications would be enabled by high-performance visibly transparent photovoltaic (PV) devices, including building-integrated photovoltaics and integrated PV chargers for portable electronics.
Previously, many attempts have been made toward demonstrating visibly transparent or semitransparent PSCs. However, these demonstrations often result in low visible light transparency and/or low device efficiency because suitable polymeric PV materials and efficient transparent conductors were not well deployed in device design and fabrication.
A team of UCLA researchers from the California NanoSystems Institute, the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science and UCLA's Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry have demonstrated high-performance, solution-processed, visibly transparent polymer solar cells through the incorporation of near-infrared light-sensitive polymer and using silver nanowire composite films as the top transparent electrode. The near-infrared photoactive polymer absorbs more near-infrared light but is less sensitive to visible light, balancing solar cell performance and transparency in the visible wavelength region.
Another breakthrough is the transparent conductor made of a mixture of silver nanowire and titanium dioxide nanoparticles, which was able to replace the opaque metal electrode used in the past. This composite electrode also allows the solar cells to be fabricated economically by solution processing. With this combination, 4% power-conversion efficiency for solution-processed and visibly transparent polymer solar cells has been achieved.
"We are excited by this new invention on transparent solar cells, which applied our recent advances in transparent conducting windows (also published in ACS Nano) to fabricate these devices," said Paul S.Weiss, CNSI director and Fred Kavli Chair in NanoSystems Sciences.
Explore further:
Researchers develop new method for producing transparent conductors
More information:
pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/nn3029327

elektron
2.6 / 5 (14) Jul 20, 2012prefacing 'transparent' with 'visibly', gets irritating well before the 7th time.
xX_GT_Xx
3.2 / 5 (11) Jul 20, 2012Same problem, too. Ok, so you've got your windows to produce power. Now what? Wire up your windows to your breaker box? This is not practical unless electricians get into the window installation business.
foolspoo
3.3 / 5 (7) Jul 20, 2012TAz00
4.4 / 5 (7) Jul 20, 2012Think Burj Khalifa, Dubai. A building that size, 4% becomes alot.
Shakescene21
4.7 / 5 (6) Jul 20, 2012jrsm
5 / 5 (8) Jul 20, 2012Temple
4.4 / 5 (7) Jul 20, 2012Win-win.
And *of course* this technology is primitive, *of course* there are any number of hurdles to actually harnessing this energy. This is how progress works. Tesla's and Edison's first electric devices could hardly be considered practically useful in homes of the day. The same goes for the infrastructure available in the early days of the automobile, and the internet for that matter.
Things change as technology progresses. This is another in a long line of important steps towards wasting less energy and reducing our reliance on energy that carries such high cost (by all definitions of the term cost).
Bewia
4 / 5 (4) Jul 20, 2012Eikka
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 20, 2012Imagine a skyscraper with all-glass exterior.
Removing 4% of the energy from the sunlight getting through the windows removes a chunk of the heat that the AC has to deal with, too.
javjav
5 / 5 (2) Jul 20, 2012Yes, that is the key point. They could come "for free". Today the biggest cost of solar panels is the installation cost. But this cells could piggy back in other processes like substituting isolation layers on windows and roof surfaces. Look at those office buildings that are fully covered by glass. The low efficiency would be compensated by the big surface area. Add a second layer to get another 4% from the visible spectrum and it may worth it.
Bewia
2.5 / 5 (4) Jul 20, 2012Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (5) Jul 20, 2012http://www.7starh...otel.jpg
Or the Anaratower Dubai.
http://www.inhabi...r234.jpg
Or DubioTech1 Dubai.
http://assets.inh...ech1.jpg
"Think Burj Khalifa, Dubai." - Tazoo
djr
5 / 5 (8) Jul 21, 2012c-dric
2 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2012Code_Warrior
4.5 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2012djr
5 / 5 (3) Jul 21, 2012My guess would be that these panels are far less environmentally damaging than running our world on oil and gas - if you take a life time calculus - but are we willing to do such a calculus? I smell a problem when we are only willing to suddenly be outraged and demand an accounting of alternative energies.
sherriffwoody
3 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2012NotParker
2.1 / 5 (7) Jul 21, 2012TheGhostofOtto1923
2 / 5 (8) Jul 21, 2012http://en.wikiped...-ext.jpg
-This could also be useful when designing multi-layer membranes to serve as inflatable habitats in orbit, on the moon or mars, or even in remote locations on this planet. It would save weight and cargo space.
Like I say the AGW hype is producing a lot of tech which is directly applicable to space colonization, and which might not otherwise get developed.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.2 / 5 (9) Jul 21, 2012"Aren't the polymer's oil based?" - ParkerTard
Poor, mentally ill ParkerTard.
wwqq
1.3 / 5 (4) Jul 21, 2012This is a fallacy that is oft repeated for every form of green flim-flam. If everyone saved 1% of their electricity demand by unplugging everything when not in use, or if everyone's windows generated 1% of their electricity needs etc. it adds up to a large number, but it's still a pitiful 1%.
Burj Khalifa is huge, but it also houses a huge number of people. What's more, it's surrounded by seemingly endless desert on all sides, which is a far better place to put the PV panels.
elektron
1 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2012This is true only because the building is situated in a country that is ideal for proper sun harvesting farms that would be a lot more efficient anyway.
antialias_physorg
2.8 / 5 (9) Jul 21, 2012sennekuyl
not rated yet Jul 21, 2012While electricians will still need to be involved --- a good thing IMO --- there doesn't seem to be a reason why it can't be a type of appliance, using modular terminators. Windows installers complete the windows, electricians connect it up to existing wiring.
I'd like to know if if it can be layered on to existing surface. That would be a huge bonus.
emilyhasbooks
3 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2012jms9
1 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2012At least now firefighters can see the big, blue solar panels on the roof and know that their life is going to be in danger because of your solar power. Conceal the panels in windows and you're going to see a lot of electrocuted firefighters.
There are reasons not to install solar panels in residences.
SteveL
5 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2012I'm not certain this would be very useful for residential windows due to the low power conversion, poor solar angle and line losses to a centralized conversion point.
SteveL
5 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2012antialias_physorg
2 / 5 (4) Jul 23, 2012There are plenty of houses out there with sizeable PV installations. Some of which have surely burned down by now. I have never heard of a fire fighter getting electrocuted. Could you link to a source?
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (2) Jul 24, 2012Good idea. Run the LED lighting to offset the opacity of the PV layer.
Just kidding.
But I don't think this would be very useful for greenhouses. The whole point of a greenhouse is to get infrared in - so you really don't want to keep it out by converting it to electricity.
SteveL
5 / 5 (1) Jul 24, 2012The low power LED lighting I was mentioning was for night-time safety or security or even extend the growing day.
Skepticus
1 / 5 (2) Jul 25, 2012No, We just voice our Worker's Union concerns.
sherky
1 / 5 (3) Jul 26, 2012Eric_B
not rated yet Jul 29, 2012Yes, there are whores who are paid to spread doom and gloom or AGW "skepticism" on anything that doesn't flatter big oil.
This forum is a good place to look if you want (for some strange reason that most people of the opposite sex wouldn't understand) to find them.
sennekuyl
not rated yet Aug 04, 2012antialias_physorg
not rated yet Aug 04, 2012Yes they are.
SteveL
3 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2012The value of freedom of speech is in protecting the rights of the fringe minority, not the mainstream. The majority tends to forget this.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Aug 05, 2012True, however, hanging around for years and years on a website where they don't accomplish anything? No one does that. They HAVE to be paid.
As for freedom of speech: Freedom of speech does not apply here.
1) This is a private website
2) The first amendemnt says only that GOVERNMENT shall make no law to limit freedom of speech. In full:
Note the word 'Congress'.