When to rein in the stock market

Jul 05, 2012

The stock market should be regulated only during times of extraordinary financial disruptions when speculators can destroy healthy businesses, according to a new study led by a Michigan State University scholar.

The study, in the Journal of , is one of the first to suggest when the U.S. should get involved in the market.

The answer: rarely. The SEC should step in only when outside financial make it impossible for large shareholders to fend off "short sellers" – or betting a company's value will decrease, said Naveen Khanna, finance professor in MSU's Broad College of Business.

Otherwise, the market regulates itself just fine due to the healthy tug-of-war between large shareholders and short sellers, he said.

"The government should only get involved during times of severe market disruptions," Khanna said. "And even then, the government's involvement should be only temporary."

An example of a severe disruption was the global financial crisis of 2008. The SEC stepped in to regulate short selling for a temporary period, which was the right move even though highly criticized at the time, Khanna said.

In short selling, an investor "borrows" stocks from a broker, sells the shares and gets the proceeds. Later on, the investor must cover the "short" by buying back the same number of shares and returning them to the broker. If the price has dropped, as anticipated, the short seller buys back the stock at the lower price and makes a profit on the difference.

During the 2008 crisis, the credit market froze, preventing large shareholders from buying up stock in their companies to counteract the short sellers. Khanna and other experts believe predatory short selling helped sink the massive investment bank Lehman Brothers and damaged other large firms.

Short sellers play an important role by bringing to light negative – but necessary – information about a company, such as failing business contracts or flagging production. Khanna said it is only during significant economic disruptions that short selling can lead to a company's "death spiral" – when short sellers exploit the disruption to lower an otherwise healthy company's stock price to the point that it can no longer do business and is forced into bankruptcy.

At the same time, overregulation of short selling could dissuade large shareholders from battling the short sellers, leaving it up to the government instead. This so-called "moral hazard" can destroy company value as well.

"We overregulate in this country," Khanna said. "The government has the best of intentions, but it rarely works out."

Professor Richmond Mathews from the University of Maryland co-authored the study, "Doing battle with short sellers: The conflicted role of blockholders in bear raids."

Explore further: Entrepreneurs to venture capitalists: Don't be a Scrooge

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Traders Who Sell Short Stocks Are Well-Informed

Apr 03, 2008

The term “short selling” refers to the practice of selling shares the seller does not own, in the hope of repurchasing them later at a lower price. A new study in The Journal of Finance reveals that there is a large ...

Zynga holders plan to sell up to $400M in stock

Mar 14, 2012

Zynga shareholders may sell up to $400 million of stock through a public offering, three months after the online game maker went public, to try to avoid a drop in its stock price.

Recommended for you

Over-identifying restrictions in economic analysis

Nov 25, 2014

The analysis of empirical economics has long made use of a tool called the generalized method of moments (GMM). This method is used as a generic way of estimating parameters in an empirical model where the ...

Tracking Chinese aid to Africa

Nov 24, 2014

Is a fancy new school in an African government official's hometown a coincidence, or evidence of systematic favouritism in the distribution of aid?

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jimee
1 / 5 (1) Jul 05, 2012
Let them steal and defraud the poor, until the banks take everyone's hard earned money and cause misery for the everyman, while eating hummingbird tongues ripped out while they were alive.
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2012

oh Jimmy, you are so melodramatic.

In a Democracy, the people get the government the deserve.

Americans are no longer smart enough to govern themselves. The double election of Bush proved that.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.