A pinch of opportunity makes deep inequality more palatable

Jul 26, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Just a tiny hint of opportunity has a disproportionately powerful effect - making unfairness more acceptable to disadvantaged people, new research has found.

A study by Eugenio Proto, an from the Centre for Competitive Advantage in the (CAGE) at the University of Warwick and two other co-authors, looked at decision-making and how it was influenced by people’s perceptions of fairness.

Researchers set up a game between two people where one person (the proposer) offers to split £10 between themselves and their partner, with the proposer able to decide the exact amount he or she is willing to offer.

If that amount is not accepted by to the second person (the responder) then neither gets any money.

Known as an ultimatum game, this kind of set-up is frequently studied by economists – but for the first time the CAGE experiment introduced an element of inequality via an increasingly-biased rigged lottery to decide who becomes the proposer, the stronger of the two positions.

It makes sense that when people see clear-cut unfairness, they are less likely to accept it - and this was shown in the results.

When the opportunity to become the proposer was 50 per cent – i.e completely fair – responders  on average rejected an offer by the proposer of £2.15 or less.

And when the chance of becoming the proposer was rigged at 0 per cent – i.e complete inequality – responders rejected offers of £2.96 or less.

But when just a one per cent chance of becoming a proposer was introduced - i.e the lottery was still vastly rigged biased in the proposer’s favour -  responders rejected offers of £2.53 or less.

In other words the difference between having absolutely no chance and having just a one per cent chance was valued at 43p (£2.96 - £2.53) – proportionally much larger than the 38p value (£2.53 - £2.15) given to the gap between 1 and 50 per cent.

Dr Eugenio Proto, Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Warwick, said he was surprised to discover this quirk in human decision-making.

“When you look at it rationally, it makes no sense that people are placing such a disproportionate value on that first one per cent increase in opportunity.

“But that slight increase in fairness seems to have some kind of symbolic meaning.

“It appears people are happy to accept extreme inequality when they have this tiny carrot dangled in front of them.

“We’ve got to remember that our experiments are conducted in a lab at a university, not in the real world which is far more complex.

“But these results could shed light on why people living in unequal societies aren’t more vocal in rejecting unfairness.

 “It seems that even if people believe they have just the tiniest of chances to become the next Bill Gates, it’s enough to keep them tolerant of obvious inequality.”

Anirban Kar of the Delhi School of Economics, one of the other two co-authors, added: “It makes sense that when see clear-cut unfairness in the system, they are more likely to reject an unequal outcome than if the same outcome was generated by a fair system. 

“Participation in the system, surprisingly enough, even a symbolic one (a modicum of voice) seems to have a significant impact”.

 The research paper Everyone Wants a Chance: Initial Positions and Fairness in Ultimatum Games was co-authored with Gianluca Grimalda of Universitat Jaume I, Castelló in Spain and Anirban Kar of the Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi.

Explore further: Marcellus drilling boom may have led to too many hotel rooms

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Strategic player challenges tip matches

Jan 24, 2012

Grand Slam tennis players in the US, Wimbledon and Australian Opens could improve their chances of winning sets, matches and even tournaments through more aggressive and strategic use of challenges, Swinburne ...

Shadow RBA sheds light on interest rates

Jul 29, 2011

The general consensus view of members of a new shadow RBA board is that the current interest rate is at the correct level, however there is some uncertainty.

Hope for those with a depressive disposition

Jan 30, 2012

Good news for the 13 per cent of the population with depressive personality traits: their negative outlook does not have to be permanent. This has been shown by psychologist Rachel Maddux in new research from Lund University ...

Recommended for you

Marcellus drilling boom may have led to too many hotel rooms

Sep 18, 2014

Drilling in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale region led to a rapid increase in both the number of hotels and hotel industry jobs, but Penn State researchers report that the faltering occupancy rate may signal that there are ...

Entrepreneurs aren't overconfident gamblers

Sep 17, 2014

Leaving one's job to become an entrepreneur is inarguably risky. But it may not be the fear of risk that makes entrepreneurs more determined to succeed. A new study finds entrepreneurs are also concerned about what they might ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Birger
not rated yet Jul 26, 2012
So by allowing a tiny bit of social mobility, rigid class societies can lumber on... It certainly explains a lot.