Ladybirds thrive on organic aphids

Jul 06, 2012 By Tom Marshall
Ladybirds thrive on organic aphids

Ladybird larvae that eat prey raised on organically-grown crops are more likely to survive than those eating aphids raised on crops grown with conventional fertiliser, a new experiment shows.

The study, published in , could have important implications for how harness to control pests.

Many people believe is better for their health. This lab-based study didn't test that idea, but it does suggest it can be better for the health of whatever ends up eating you - if you're an aphid. Ladybird larvae fed on organically-raised were ten per cent more likely to make it to - a difference that could end up making a big impact on their populations, if it turns out to hold true on farms.

Dr. Jo Staley of NERC's Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH), one of the paper's authors, says bigger experiments looking at a wider range of predators and prey in real field environments, are needed before we'll know if these relationships work in more complex systems.

'This is just a preliminary study, but we've shown that a simple change of fertiliser in a single crop plant can produce a significant difference to ladybird mortality,' Staley says.

The team fed aphids on plants grown with artificial ammonium nitrate fertilizers, and others on plants grown with organic fertilizers like chicken manure and green manure . They then removed these aphids from the plants and fed them to captive ladybird larvae, monitoring the predators' survival rates.

The scientists had the idea that the difference in ladybird mortality they saw might be because the aphids were storing up poisonous chemicals called glucosinolates that the plants make to defend themselves from pests, in order to enhance their own defences against predators. Artificially-fertilised plants can produce more of these chemicals, so the thought was that aphids raised on them would end up more toxic.

But Staley says that doesn't seem to be the explanation for what's happening here. For one thing, the same drop in ladybird survival happened whether the larvae ate aphids that specialise in eating this particular plant, which are known to sequester its glucosinolate toxins in this way, or more generalist aphids which aren't thought to have that ability.
More fundamentally, chemical analysis of the bodies of aphids from the two different groups didn't reveal any significant differences in levels of glucosinolates, the main chemical that the aphids are thought to exploit to defend themselves from predators.

Staley says it's possible that the ladybirds were feeling the ill-effects of toxin-rich plant material held in the guts of its prey, or that defensive chemicals other than glucosinolates are responsible.

'Biological control' methods, like releasing large numbers of captive-bred ladybirds onto farmland to control aphids, have been gaining popularity in recent years. Likewise, various less extreme approaches aim to improve biological control of by increasing the abundance of predators like ladybirds and lacewing larvae, using methods such as leaving field margins uncultivated or building strips of vegetation nicknamed 'beetle banks'. This study suggests such tactics may be more or less beneficial depending on how particular farmers fertilize their crops.

Explore further: How rockstars and peacocks attract the ladies

More information: Predator mortality depends on whether its prey feeds on organic or conventionally fertilised plants. JA Banfield-Zanin, et al. Biological Control, 2012. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.05.008

Provided by PlanetEarth Online search and more info website

5 /5 (3 votes)

Related Stories

Aphid population control is studied

Nov 15, 2006

U.S. agricultural scientists say farmers could save up to $12 per acre on insecticide treatments for soybean aphids by using the aphid's natural enemies.

Transgenic maize is more susceptible to aphids

Aug 29, 2007

The environmental consequences of transgenic crops are the focus of numerous investigations, such as the one published in the journal PloS ONE, which was carried out by Cristina Faria and her colleagues, under the supervision ...

Recommended for you

New planthopper species found in southern Spain

4 hours ago

Not much is known about the the genus of planthopper known as Conosimus, which now includes six species after a new one was recently discovered in the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula in the Spanish ...

How rockstars and peacocks attract the ladies

21 hours ago

What is it that makes rockstars so attractive to the opposite sex? Turns out Charles Darwin had it pegged hundreds of years ago – and it has a lot to do with peacocks.

Fecal transplants let packrats eat poison

Jul 21, 2014

Woodrats lost their ability to eat toxic creosote bushes after antibiotics killed their gut microbes. Woodrats that never ate the plants were able to do so after receiving fecal transplants with microbes ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PeterD
1 / 5 (4) Jul 06, 2012
No surprise there. So called "conventional fertilizers" are chemicals developed to make bombs during the Second World War. When the war ended, to stay in business, the began selling them as fertilizers. Plants grow with them look good, but, in truth, they are sick, and they make us sick. Of course, that is of no consequence to the manufacturers of these poisons.
weber_kabbanet
not rated yet Jul 08, 2012
Thanks for the information and success.kabbanet.ro sitedesignnet.ro
Bewia
1 / 5 (1) Jul 08, 2012
It could contribute to the overpopulation of ladybugs in the America.. http://www.essort...963.html