Investors warm to Facebook after IPO flop

Jul 01, 2012 by Rob Lever
Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg is seen on a screen getting ready to ring the NASDAQ stock exchange opening bell in Times Square in New York in May 2012. After a dire stock market debut, Facebook has clawed back a large chunk of its losses as investors look past the flubbed initial public offering and gradually warm to the leading social network.

After a dire stock market debut, Facebook has clawed back a large chunk of its losses as investors look past the flubbed initial public offering and gradually warm to the leading social network.

Facebook shares were offered in May at $38, and after an opening hours jump slid over the next two weeks to as low as $25.52 on June 6. But since then the stock has risen more than 20 percent to Friday's close at $31.09.

Analyst views are mixed, but investors now seem focused on the potential for growth of the world's biggest social network, which is to announce its first as a public on July 26.

Herman Leung of Susquehanna International Group said he sees shares rising to $48 over the next 12 months as Facebook develops more ways to boost advertising and other revenues.

"I think Facebook is still a company that has a lot of opportunity for the business to expand, and the expansion opportunities have not been fully optimized," Leung told AFP.

"They have 900 million users, all are highly engaged, they all love the product, they all use the product."

The stock may have been hurt by an which put too many shares on the market, Leung said, but that will eventually be absorbed.

Lou Kerner of the Social Internet Fund said he sees the stock heading to $44 within the next 12 months "based on my of revenue growth and margin expansion."

Kerner said sentiment was hurt by missteps in the IPO process, and that the investment banks "misread interest in buying to flip with interest in buying to own, which was greatly magnified by Nasdaq's massive mishandling of the opening and early trade flows."

"All that said, over time, those mistakes will become increasingly irrelevant to the , as it will increasingly reflect Facebook's execution," Kerner told AFP.

involved in the IPO were permitted to issue their own research notes after a 40-day quiet period, and many were, not surprisingly, positive.

Morgan Stanley's Scott Devitt set a $38 price target and wrote Facebook "is uniquely positioned to leverage its large and highly engaged user base to monetize the mobile Internet."

Devitt dismissed concerns that Facebook's revenue base would be eroded as more users shift to mobile devices, where advertising models are untested.

"Facebook is the most downloaded app on every major mobile platform, and we view mobile as a significant long-term opportunity," he added.

Less enthusiastic, Citi offered a "neutral" rating with a price outlook of $35.

Citi analysts said Facebook will likely become the largest Internet firm in terms of revenue and profits one day, but that "much of this potential has been priced in."

By Wall Street metrics, using the price to earnings ratio, Facebook shares are expensive, at 40 to 50 times projected profits, compared with around 15 times earnings for the broad market.

Anthony DiClemente of Barclays said that despite all of Facebook's positives, it has a "lofty valuation," and "mobile monetization uncertainty."

RBC Capital Markets analyst Andre Sequin sees a $40 price target because of how Facebook is transforming the way people interact online.

"As Facebook represents a shift in how people interact with one another and information on the Web, we believe the company deserves a premium to our peer Internet coverage universe," he writes.

"In our view, the company is currently in a transformational phase in which it is taking steps to more fully and effectively monetize the unparalleled user base and user engagement it has already built."

In a view worthy of Facebook itself, the finance analytics firm Trefis sees the company worth $33.19 a share. Its "community price" from "friends and experts" is $32.62, with 67 percent bullish and 33 percent bearish.

Analyst Trip Chowdhry at Global Equities Research remains unconvinced. He says Facebook is "a great company" but that the stock is grossly overpriced.

"Facebook is a good company but the valuation of the company is totally off," Chowdhry said.

"I think $10 to $15 would fairly reflect the value of the company. They cannot discount 10 years of forward earnings."

While Facebook still has tremendous potential, Chowdhry tells investors: "Don't get carried away by emotions, look at the fundamental picture. The world doesn't start with Facebook and doesn't end with ."

Explore further: 2012 movie massacre hung over 'Interview' decision

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Morgan Stanley may refund some Facebook investors

May 24, 2012

(AP) -- Morgan Stanley, the lead investment bank in Facebook's troubled initial public offering, will compensate retail investors who overpaid when they bought Facebook's stock in Friday's IPO, according to a source familiar ...

Recommended for you

2012 movie massacre hung over 'Interview' decision

10 hours ago

When a group claiming credit for the hacking of Sony Pictures Entertainment threated violence against theaters showing "The Interview" earlier this week, the fate of the movie's big-screen life was all but ...

Clooney slams skittish Hollywood after Sony hack

17 hours ago

Film star George Clooney slammed the Hollywood movie industry for failing to stand up against the cyber threats that prompted Sony Pictures to cancel release of the movie "The Interview."

Atos shares soar after Xerox acquisition

20 hours ago

Shares in French tech firm Atos soared nearly five percent on Friday as traders cheered the news it had bought the IT wing of Xerox for more than $1 billion.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mortoo
not rated yet Jul 02, 2012
I don't understand why the IPO is constantly referred to as a "flop" and "flubbed". It seems to me that the company would want to get the most money out of it they could. And the price seems about right.

I can see that people who bought in and thought their money would double overnight are disappointed, but how does that make it a flop?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.