'The most important discovery in recent decades'

Jul 06, 2012
'The most important discovery in recent decades'
Sandra Kortner is a Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich © MPI for Physics

Interview with Sandra Kortner of the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich, who heads a Minerva junior research group at the ATLAS experiment of the LHC and also coordinates an international group of researchers who are using ATLAS to look for the Higgs particle.

You have just heard the two talks on the latest results. What is your reaction?

Kortner: I am very excited and enthusiastic. The results of the two detectors are so close to each other. This is really phenomenal. It is the most important discovery in in recent decades. This is a dream come true for me.

Would you say that the long-sought Higgs particle has been found?

Kortner: We have definitely discovered a new particle. At the moment, the data also support it being the as predicted by the . But we need to measure the properties of this particle more precisely to clarify its identity.

Why are there still doubts about the identity of the particle?

Kortner: We are not able to directly detect the Higgs particle. It is created in a collision and decays in fractions of a second into different components. Theory predicts that a Higgs particle can decay in several different ways, the depending on the mass of the Higgs particle. The mass is not unequivocally predicted by theory. We now have an approximate measured value of 125 GeV to 126 GeV, which will become more precise with more data. In ATLAS, we have so far only investigated two of all possible decay channels with sufficient . These results do indeed support this being a Higgs particle, but we will need to investigate the other decay possibilities and rates in order to determine the properties more precisely.

Which other particles are also possible?

Kortner: There could be further that are kind of messengers of a beyond the standard model. These include the particles of so-called super-symmetry theory, for example. And it could also be a super-symmetric Higgs boson. However, with the data obtained so far, it’s not yet possible to say.

Which properties of the particle will be measured in the future?

Kortner: In addition to the mass, we want to measure the spin, for example. In greatly simplified terms, this can be imagined to be the particle’s rotation. The standard model predicts a value of zero for the spin. These and other parameters are important because they enter into the standard model. Their measurement is going to take years.

Physicists today know a whole series of elementary particles. What is so special about the Higgs particle?

Kortner: The standard model has two types of particles: one type forms the building blocks of matter; the other mediates the forces between them. These particles have very different masses. There are even massless particles, such as the photon. The Higgs mechanism, which also predicts the existence of the Higgs particles, explains how the particles are given their mass. In this respect, it is something special. It’s the key particle for the understanding of matter. However, the Higgs particle does not explain the magnitude of the mass of the particular particles. It doesn’t even predict the mass of the Higgs particle itself.

Assuming the identity of the particle is confirmed as Higgs. What is the next step?

Kortner: We are all convinced that above a certain energy there must be a new physics beyond the standard model. The theory of super-symmetry is such an extension. It would explain why there are two different types of particle, namely the fermions with half-integral spin and the bosons with integral spin. Super-symmetry predicts the existence of a large number of as yet undiscovered particles. The is ideal for finding them. In addition, the lightest super-symmetry particle predicted is a prime candidate for the mysterious dark matter. This search will take us years.

If this discovery is the Higgs particle, will it be honoured with the Nobel Prize in physics?

Kortner: I think so. I do not believe though that it will be awarded to CERN or the collaborations of experiments, but to the scientists who proposed the Higgs mechanism. This could be somewhat more difficult, as several people have made an important contribution: in addition to Peter Higgs from the University of Edinburgh, Robert Brout and François Englert in Brussels, and Carl Hagen, Gerald Guralnik, and Thomas Walther Kibble at Imperial College in London also developed the theory at almost the same time. Brout died recently, so that only five physicists would need to be honoured. However, the Statutes of the Nobel Committee do not allow this.

Could at least a few of the experimental physicists at the LHC or the detectors hope for a Nobel Prize?

Kortner: No, it is not possible to single out three persons who have played an outstanding role. This discovery is the achievement of an international collaboration in which absolutely everyone has contributed to the success. This is why none of us has hopes of being awarded the Prize. Nevertheless, we are all very proud and overjoyed at this moment – today alone is already a prize for us.

Interview by Thomas Bührke

Explore further: New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The hunt for the Higgs steps up a gear

Aug 28, 2008

The hunt for the Higgs boson, the most highly sought-after particle in physics, received a boost this month with the release of two new results from the Tevatron particle collider at the US Department of Energy's ...

Z-prime search may hurdle Higgs hunt

Aug 25, 2011

If you're bummed about humanity's biggest accelerator not producing a Higgs particle yet, maybe the latest effort to find a Z-prime will make you feel better. ...

Recommended for you

New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening

14 hours ago

Cancer screening is a critical approach for preventing cancer deaths because cases caught early are often more treatable. But while there are already existing ways to screen for different types of cancer, ...

How bubble studies benefit science and engineering

15 hours ago

The image above shows a perfect bubble imploding in weightlessness. This bubble, and many like it, are produced by the researchers from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. What ...

Famous Feynman lectures put online with free access

15 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Back in the early sixties, physicist Richard Feynman gave a series of lectures on physics to first year students at Caltech—those lectures were subsequently put into print and made into text ...

Single laser stops molecular tumbling motion instantly

20 hours ago

In the quantum world, making the simple atom behave is one thing, but making the more complex molecule behave is another story. Now Northwestern University scientists have figured out an elegant way to stop a molecule from ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (9) Jul 06, 2012
Higgs doesn't exist. The mass is the electric dipole moment.
This particle is a neutral fermion.
Antonio Saraiva
1 / 5 (2) Jul 07, 2012
The standard model has two types of particles: one type forms the building blocks of matter; the other mediates the forces between them. These particles have very different masses. There are even massless particles, such as the photon. The Higgs mechanism, which also predicts the existence of the Higgs particles, explains how the particles are given their mass...

By the way, talking about the Standard model, for someone who familiar would found that it is rather a mathematical theory, in which it is difficult to understand how the theory works! So it would be nice if we could know its physical mechanism (something like one below).