Google seeks to close book in author copyright case

Jul 27, 2012
The screen of a computer features a Google Book search on the home page of Internet giant Google's website. Google asked a US court Friday to dismiss a lawsuit over the Internet giant's massive book-scanning project, saying the effort is "not a substitute" for books themselves.

Google asked a US court Friday to put an end to a long-running lawsuit over the Internet giant's massive book-scanning project, saying the effort is "not a substitute" for books themselves.

The US tech giant offered its defense by arguing that its Google Books project should be considered "fair use" under copyright law, and said the judge should rule in its favor.

"Google Books gives people a new and more efficient way to find books relevant to their interests," the company said in its petition for summary judgment in the case in a New York federal court.

"The tool is not a substitute for the books themselves -- readers still must buy a book from a store or borrow it from a library to read it. Rather, Google Books is an important advance on the card-catalogue method of finding books."

Google said the effort is beneficial to readers, authors and the public.

"Readers benefit by being able to find relevant books," Google argued. "Authors benefit because their books can be more readily found, purchased, and read. The public benefits from the increase of knowledge that results."

Google has scanned more than 20 million books so far in the project. Books in the public domain -- without current copyrights -- are made available online to the public for free. For copyrighted books Google offers a searchable database that displays snippets of text.

The Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers filed the suit in 2005 alleging copyright infringement.

A tentative settlement in the case was reached in 2008 under which Google would pay $125 million to resolve copyright claims and to establish an independent "Book Rights Registry." But a judge rejected the deal.

Opponents of the agreement have said allowing Google to proceed with the project raises anti-trust, privacy and copyright issues, while also granting sole rights to Google to digitize millions of out-of-print works whose authors cannot be traced.

Others say copyright cannot be waived unless an author expressly opts out of the deal.

Google said in its argument, however, that copyright is not absolute, and that numerous fair uses exist under the law.

"The purpose of Google Books is to help users find books that are of interest to them," it said. "Research and scholarly uses range from literary research to helping fifth-graders find books for their book reports."

A Google spokesman said: "We believe Google Books constitutes fair use by allowing users to identify interesting books and find ways to borrow or buy those books, much like a card catalog for the digital age."

Plaintiffs in the case are to file replies by August 24, and Judge Denny Chin is scheduled to hear arguments October 9 on whether to proceed.

Explore further: US Congress decriminalizes cellphone unlocking

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Google given more time to reach book settlement

Jun 01, 2011

A US judge on Wednesday allowed Google and US authors and publishers more time to seek a new settlement over the Internet giant's plan to create a massive online library and bookstore.

NY judge hearing Google book case grows impatient

Jul 19, 2011

A judge warned lawyers for authors and publishers and Google Tuesday that he will decide whether snippets of books can be sold online without the permission of copyright holders if the sides do not settle their 6-year-old ...

Google to digitize old books from Rome, Florence

Mar 10, 2010

(AP) -- Google says it will scan up to 1 million old books in national libraries in Rome and Florence, including works by astronomer Galileo Galilei, in what's being described as the first deal of its kind.

Recommended for you

Scalping can raise ticket prices

Jul 25, 2014

Scalping gets a bad rap. For years, artists and concert promoters have stigmatized ticket resale as a practice that unfairly hurts their own sales and forces fans to pay exorbitant prices for tickets to sold-out concerts. ...

Study shows role of media in sharing life events

Jul 24, 2014

To share is human. And the means to share personal news—good and bad—have exploded over the last decade, particularly social media and texting. But until now, all research about what is known as "social sharing," or the ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

chardo137
not rated yet Jul 28, 2012
To whom it may concern: Please let Google help us find books!