Balancing the economics and ecology of ecosystems

July 6, 2012 By Allison Jarrell
Wetlands near the Coast Fork Willamette River in Eugene, Oregon, with Mount Pisgah in the background. Credit: Jsayre64

Is it possible to put a dollar value on the beauty of a river or to judge the worth of a wetland?

Some think so. The concept, referred to as an “ecosystem services market,” involves assigning monetary values to ecosystem services in order to assess their economic worth. 
 
The application of this market is pretty simple: You break it, you buy it. 
 
In other words, when businesses, developers or individuals alter the environment in some way, they must either meet the regulations protecting the natural resources involved, or they have to compensate land and water managers for their adverse impact. This can be done by repairing the environment on site or by reimbursing a conservation bank elsewhere that restores or protects an equivalent habitat. These banks are permanently protected lands that often contain species that are endangered or threatened.
 
This system may seem purely beneficial from a conservation standpoint, but not all ecologists agree with it. Critics of the market argue that ecosystems provide people with numerous services that aren’t always easily measured or recognized. Is a river filled with a variety of fish and insects worth more than a hiking trail surrounded by birds and wildflowers? Does a pond that offers fishing have more value than a pristine one untouched by humans?
 
Despite widespread skepticism, several markets already exist in the U.S., including a few developed by The Willamette Partnership in Oregon. They list several reasons on their website for adopting these markets, including the idea that “they marry the economy and the environment, creating new business opportunities while increasing the pace, scope, and effectiveness of conservation and restoration.” 
 
The controversy over quantifying how much our natural resources are worth will be explored in detail during the Ecological Society of America’s annual meeting in August. Experts with opposing viewpoints will discuss the science behind ecosystems and the practicality of simplifying nature down to economic services with monetary values. 
 
One thing that can be agreed upon is that without a solid understanding of the ecological systems being discussed, this method will never work. In order to judge the worth of a stream or a forest, we must first understand our interactions with nature. That’s hardly an easy task in an ever-changing environment.

Explore further: Conservation policies 'impaired by over-confident predictions'

Related Stories

Not Finding Nemo becomes a reality

December 13, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Three Simon Fraser University biologists and an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) scientist say it’s no longer fiction but fact. No one will be able to find Nemo if conservation action ...

Big trees boost city life

February 3, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research from The Australian National University has revealed for the first time the role large trees play in sustaining biodiversity and bird life in urban environments.

Recommended for you

Research advances on transplant ward pathogen

August 28, 2015

The fungus Cryptococcus causes meningitis, a brain disease that kills about 1 million people each year—mainly those with impaired immune systems due to AIDS, cancer treatment or an organ transplant. It's difficult to treat ...

Genomes uncover life's early history

August 24, 2015

A University of Manchester scientist is part of a team which has carried out one of the biggest ever analyses of genomes on life of all forms.

Rare nautilus sighted for the first time in three decades

August 25, 2015

In early August, biologist Peter Ward returned from the South Pacific with news that he encountered an old friend, one he hadn't seen in over three decades. The University of Washington professor had seen what he considers ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jimee
3 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2012
Unless you place no value on preserving the planet for everyone. After all, if I'm able to operate my corporation from my private island in what's left of paradise? The riffraff can figure out how to find their own oxygen, potable water, and food.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.