Balancing the economics and ecology of ecosystems

Jul 06, 2012 By Allison Jarrell
Wetlands near the Coast Fork Willamette River in Eugene, Oregon, with Mount Pisgah in the background. Credit: Jsayre64

Is it possible to put a dollar value on the beauty of a river or to judge the worth of a wetland?

Some think so. The concept, referred to as an “ecosystem services market,” involves assigning monetary values to ecosystem services in order to assess their economic worth. 
 
The application of this market is pretty simple: You break it, you buy it. 
 
In other words, when businesses, developers or individuals alter the environment in some way, they must either meet the regulations protecting the natural resources involved, or they have to compensate land and water managers for their adverse impact. This can be done by repairing the environment on site or by reimbursing a conservation bank elsewhere that restores or protects an equivalent habitat. These banks are permanently protected lands that often contain species that are endangered or threatened.
 
This system may seem purely beneficial from a conservation standpoint, but not all ecologists agree with it. Critics of the market argue that ecosystems provide people with numerous services that aren’t always easily measured or recognized. Is a river filled with a variety of fish and insects worth more than a hiking trail surrounded by birds and wildflowers? Does a pond that offers fishing have more value than a pristine one untouched by humans?
 
Despite widespread skepticism, several markets already exist in the U.S., including a few developed by The Willamette Partnership in Oregon. They list several reasons on their website for adopting these markets, including the idea that “they marry the economy and the environment, creating new business opportunities while increasing the pace, scope, and effectiveness of conservation and restoration.” 
 
The controversy over quantifying how much our natural resources are worth will be explored in detail during the Ecological Society of America’s annual meeting in August. Experts with opposing viewpoints will discuss the science behind ecosystems and the practicality of simplifying nature down to economic services with monetary values. 
 
One thing that can be agreed upon is that without a solid understanding of the ecological systems being discussed, this method will never work. In order to judge the worth of a stream or a forest, we must first understand our interactions with nature. That’s hardly an easy task in an ever-changing environment.

Explore further: Giant anteaters kill two hunters in Brazil

Provided by Inside Science News Service

5 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Not Finding Nemo becomes a reality

Dec 13, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Three Simon Fraser University biologists and an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) scientist say it’s no longer fiction but fact. No one will be able to find Nemo if conservation action ...

Big trees boost city life

Feb 03, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research from The Australian National University has revealed for the first time the role large trees play in sustaining biodiversity and bird life in urban environments.

Recommended for you

Giant anteaters kill two hunters in Brazil

12 hours ago

Giant anteaters in Brazil have killed two hunters in separate incidents, raising concerns about the animals' loss of habitat and the growing risk of dangerous encounters with people, researchers said.

Study indicates large raptors in Africa used for bushmeat

Jul 24, 2014

Bushmeat, the use of native animal species for food or commercial food sale, has been heavily documented to be a significant factor in the decline of many species of primates and other mammals. However, a new study indicates ...

Noise pollution impacts fish species differently

Jul 24, 2014

Acoustic disturbance has different effects on different species of fish, according to a new study from the Universities of Bristol and Exeter which tested fish anti-predator behaviour.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jimee
3 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2012
Unless you place no value on preserving the planet for everyone. After all, if I'm able to operate my corporation from my private island in what's left of paradise? The riffraff can figure out how to find their own oxygen, potable water, and food.