Canadian court scraps royalty for online downloads

Jul 12, 2012 by CHARMAINE NORONHA

(AP) — Canada's Supreme Court ruled Thursday that songwriters and music publishers are not entitled to royalties for song and video game downloads. It also determined that artists should be compensated when music is streamed online.

The high court ruled that downloading an individual file is not considered a communication to the public within the Copyright Act. However, streaming online is not a private transaction and should be subject to fees currently in place.

Streaming refers to watching or listening to videos and music online while downloading refers to saving a file to your hard drive.

The partly overturned a lower court decision that had allowed an organization representing musicians and the recording industry, known as the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers, to collect tariffs for both activities for its members.

"Although a download and stream are both 'transmissions' in technical terms ... they are not both 'communications' for the purposes of the Copyright Act. This is clear from the (Copyright) board's definition of a stream as a transmission of data that allows the user to listen or view the content at the time of transmission and that is not meant to be reproduced," the court said in its ruling.

"Unlike a download, the experience of a stream is much more akin to a broadcast performance."

That decision was linked to another that dealt with software companies that sell their video games online. The court ruled 5-4 that those firms shouldn't pay royalties for the music that's featured in those video games every time a consumer downloads it online.

"There is no practical difference between buying a durable copy of the work in a store, receiving a copy in the mail, or downloading an identical copy using the Internet," wrote Justices Rosalie Abella and Michael Moldaver.

"ESA (Entertainment Software Association) has already paid reproduction royalties to the copyright owners for the video games."

Copyright royalties are approved by the Copyright Board of Canada, and if those who have to pay them disagree, they can ask for a judicial review and fight them at the Federal Court of Appeal.

The court's decision on downloading and royalties, among five copyright-related cases settled Thursday, means telecommunications companies that offer music services won't have to pay as much to copyright collection agencies.

In another of the rulings Thursday, the justices said online music stores will not have to pay royalties on song previews to publishers and songwriters.

The high court ruled song previews — what a customer would listen to before purchasing digital music from online retailers such as an iTune — constitutes research under copyright legislation and thus the consumer should not pay a royalty.

"Short, low-quality previews do not compete with, or adversely affect, the downloading of the works themselves. Instead, their effect is to increase the sale and dissemination of copyrighted musical works," said the ruling.

The court also determined that record labels and recording artists should not eligible for royalties from movie and TV soundtracks, as they are considered categorically different than traditional sound recordings.

Eric Baptiste, the CEO of the Society of Composers, Authors and , commended the high court's ruling on streaming but was disappointed with the other rulings.

"We will continue to fight for the legal rights of our members to be compensated fairly for their work," he said.

The fifth ruling found that photocopying textbooks for classroom use in public schools does not infringe copyright laws, and should not be subject to a tariff, contrary to a previous Copyright Board conclusion that photocopies did not constitute "fair dealing" and required a fee. However, the matter will return to the Board for reconsideration.

All five cases were initially heard by the Supreme Court last December.

Explore further: Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

German rules against YouTube in rights case

Apr 20, 2012

(AP) -- A German court has ruled that online video platform YouTube must install filters to prevent users from uploading some music videos whose rights are held by a music-royalties collecting body.

Music downloading hearing can't be streamed online

Apr 16, 2009

(AP) -- Oral arguments in a music downloading lawsuit filed by the recording industry against a Boston University student can't be streamed online, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

EU court OKs resale of software licenses

Jul 03, 2012

(AP) — The European Union's highest court ruled Tuesday that software makers cannot keep people who download programs from selling their licenses for those programs to others — as long as they disable their own ...

Court won't reduce student's music download fine

May 21, 2012

(AP) -- The Supreme Court has refused to take up a Boston University student's constitutional challenge to a $675,000 penalty for illegally downloading 30 songs and sharing them on the Internet.

Dutch court: Web site must remove copyright works

Aug 26, 2009

(AP) -- A civil court on Wednesday ordered Dutch Web site Mininova to remove within three months all files on its servers that point to copyrighted works or face a fine of up to euro5 million ($7.16 million).

Recommended for you

Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

11 hours ago

The owners of the website Ebola.com have scored a big payday with the outbreak of the epidemic, selling the domain for more than $200,000 in cash and stock.

Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

Oct 23, 2014

Facebook on Thursday released an application that lets people create virtual "rooms" to chat about whatever they wish using any name they would like.

User comments : 0