The atomic nucleus: fissile liquid or molecule of life?

July 30, 2012
Probability density for the presence of neutrons and protons predicted for the neon-20 nucleus. It can be seen that this is not homogeneous: the neutrons and protons are distributed in clusters. © Jean-Paul Ebran/CEA

A new view of the nucleus that unifies its liquid and molecule-like aspects has been put forward by a team of researchers from France.  By making an analogy with neutron stars, the researchers have for the first time demonstrated one of the necessary conditions for the formation of molecule-like behavior within the atomic nucleus.  Such molecule-like behavior makes it possible to understand the synthesis of elements that are key to the appearance of life.  The work is published in Nature on July 19, 2012. 

The is generally described as a drop of quantum with a diameter of around a million billionth of a meter.  In particular, such liquid-like behavior explains nuclear fission, and applies especially to heavy nuclei, i.e. nuclei that contain a large number of nucleons (neutrons and ).   On the other hand, light nuclei can behave like tiny '', or clusters, made up of neutrons and protons within the nucleus.  This molecular aspect makes it possible to understand the stellar synthesis of carbon-12 and other heavier elements necessary for the appearance of life.

Until now, both the 'molecule-nucleus' and the 'liquid-nucleus' views coexisted.  Now, a team from the Institut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay (Université Paris-Sud) and from CEA (the French Atomic Energy Commission), in collaboration with the University of Zagreb, proposes a unified view of these two aspects. By solving quantum physics equations on the scale of the nucleus (in particular the Schrödinger equation), the researchers have demonstrated that, although a light nucleus can show molecule-like behavior (tending towards the ), heavier nuclei take on a liquid-like behavior.

To establish this new theory, the physicists took inspiration from neutron stars1. The deeper you go inside a neutron star, the more you pass from a crystalline medium to a liquid medium. Thanks to this analogy, the physicists identified a mechanism of transition from the liquid to the crystalline state in the nucleus.  When the interactions between neutrons and protons are not strong enough to fix them within the nucleus, the latter is in a quantum-liquid type state where protons and neutrons are delocalized.

Conversely, in a crystalline state, neutrons and protons are fixed at regular intervals within the nucleus.  The nuclear molecule is interpreted as being an intermediate state between a quantum liquid and a crystal.  In the long term, the aim is to attain a unified understanding of the various states of the .

Explore further: Nuclear physics incorporates a 'strange' flavor

More information: “How atomic nuclei cluster”, J.-P. Ebran, Elias Khan, T Nikšić and D. Vretenar, Nature, 19 July 2012.

Related Stories

Wallflowers become extroverts in a crowd

September 28, 2010

While it's long been said that two's company and three's a crowd, that's just how mesons like it. A recent experiment at DOE's Jefferson Lab demonstrates that these subatomic particles engage more with other particles when ...

Atomic core, shaken not stirred

January 5, 2012

When struck just right, protons and neutrons ring. The sub-atomic particles don’t jingle like when a hammer hits a bell. But they do jiggle in an odd dance where the protons move in one direction and the neutrons move ...

New picture of atomic nucleus emerges

March 2, 2012

( -- When most of us think of an atom, we think of tiny electrons whizzing around a stationary, dense nucleus composed of protons and neutrons, collectively known as nucleons. A collaboration between the U.S. ...

Recommended for you

Test racetrack dipole magnet produces record 16 tesla field

November 30, 2015

A new world record has been broken by the CERN magnet group when their racetrack test magnet produced a 16.2 tesla (16.2T) peak field – nearly twice that produced by the current LHC dipoles and the highest ever for a dipole ...

Turbulence in bacterial cultures

November 30, 2015

Turbulent flows surround us, from complex cloud formations to rapidly flowing rivers. Populations of motile bacteria in liquid media can also exhibit patterns of collective motion that resemble turbulent flows, provided the ...

CERN collides heavy nuclei at new record high energy

November 25, 2015

The world's most powerful accelerator, the 27 km long Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operating at CERN in Geneva established collisions between lead nuclei, this morning, at the highest energies ever. The LHC has been colliding ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2012
Does this mean that we can finally produce gold at will?
1 / 5 (2) Jul 30, 2012
We could and it may be easier, than you probably think. Larsen's theory is officially supported with NASA research.
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 30, 2012
Neutron Stars? NASA? Where's Oliver?
3 / 5 (2) Jul 31, 2012
Neutron Stars? NASA? Where's Oliver?

Indeed! Have been wondering for a long time, is he dead?
5 / 5 (3) Jul 31, 2012
@ Bewia:

That is cold fusion ideas, and it is obviously not "officially supported" as the Langley researcher explicitly notes it.

Langley's task is to look at fringe ideas, precisely because they are not verified main stream, to see if something comes out of it, not to put a stamp with "officially science" on something.

Cold fusion is pattern search, looking for a mechanism on an invented observation that has failed replication any number of times by now. It likely won't work, so to claim that "we could" is not a factual observation.

Gold isotopes have been produced in accelerators I think, just for the kick of doing what alchemistry (and cold fusion) failed in.
1 / 5 (4) Jul 31, 2012
invented observation that has failed replication any number of times by now
Cold fusion of hydrogen at nickel was never replicated with mainstream physics during last twenty years, in peer-reviewed press the less. It's ignored completely and every attempt to replicated it is ostracised systematically. So you have no factual ground for your comments: it's just speculation based on speculations of another people, but not on peer-reviewed science.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.