Apple, Samsung set for blockbuster US patent trial

Jul 28, 2012

Apple and Samsung are set to square off in a California court Monday in what is seen as the biggest patent US trial in recent memory.

Apple is seeking more than $2.5 billion in a case accusing the South Korean firm of copying designs and other patents from the and iPad maker in the trial in San Jose, California, federal court.

Samsung however alleges that Apple infringed on some of its patents for mobile phones, and the case will sort out the competing claims.

It is one of several cases in courts around the world involving the two big electronics giants in the hottest part of the tech sector, and smartphones.

While the results so far have been mixed in courts in Europe and Australia, Samsung is clearly on the defensive in the US case.

US Lucy Koh, who will preside in the jury trial barring any last-minute settlement, has issued temporary injunctions against US sales of Samsung's 10-inch Galaxy tablet and the Galaxy Nexus developed with Google.

To make matters worse, a magistrate in the case ruled Monday that Samsung failed to retain key evidence in the case by allowing emails to be destroyed after learning of the lawsuit.

That will mean Judge Koh can issue an "adverse inference" instruction to the jury.

"It's never good when the judge decides you've withheld or destroyed evidence," said R. Polk Wagner, a professor of at the University of Pennsylvania.

Florian Mueller, a consultant who blogs on patent issues in the tech sector said the decision "must be a nightmare" for Samsung as it seeks to establish credibility with the jury.

A patent attorney in Washington DC who asked to remain anonymous because of client links, said the ruling could be "a killer" for Samsung.

"Whether it was relevant or not, the fact that evidence was destroyed will be taken into consideration," he said.

Additionally, the attorney said Apple could benefit from the fact that the case is being heard in , just down the road from its headquarters in Cupertino, California.

"You like to think there is no home court advantage, but there could be," the lawyer said. "You also have the issue of a foreign company versus an American one."

Wagner said the case is probably the biggest patent trial since the 1980s case involving photo giants Polaroid and Kodak, and is important because of its size and ability to set precedent.

"I see this as the first in what I expect to be many cases involving smartphone technology," he told AFP.

"It remains to be seen what the impact will be even if Apple wins. Typically the patents are relatively easy to design around. So if Samsung loses a couple of rounds they may still be able to make their phones."

But Samsung could face big risks: If Apple wins, it would automatically get a permanent injunction on sales of Samsung devices. And if Samsung makes only minor changes, Apple could ask for the Korean firm to be held in contempt.

The case has huge financial implications for both firms and the burgeoning industry for mobile devices.

A survey by research firm IDC showed Samsung shipped 50.2 million smartphones globally in the April-June period while Apple sold 26 million iPhones. IDC said Samsung held 32.6 percent of the market to 16.9 percent for Apple.

Samsung is the leading maker of smartphones using 's Android operating system, which has become the most popular platform despite complaints from Apple that it has infringed on its patents.

Apple outlined its case for damages in paperwork filed in advance of the pivotal court battle.

The Apple filing Tuesday said Samsung, in entering the smartphone and tablet markets, "chose to compete by copying Apple."

"Samsung's infringing sales have enabled Samsung to overtake Apple as the largest manufacturer of smartphones in the world," the document said.

Apple estimated that its lost profits and Samsung's "unjust enrichment" total in the vicinity of $2.525 billion; a figure that could be ramped up given damages rules for "willful" infringement of patents.

Samsung has steadfastly denied abusing Apple patents and countered in court that Apple has been taking advantage of some of the South Korean company's patented technology for wireless connections.

In May, two days of court-directed peace talks between the chiefs of Apple and Samsung ended with no truce in the legal battle headed for court in San Jose, California.

boss Tim Cook and Samsung chief Choi Gee-Sung met in San Francisco after a judge asked the bosses to personally try to resolve the case.

Explore further: Hackerspaces used to turn ideas turn into reality

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Apple wants billions from Samsung in patent fight

Jul 24, 2012

Apple told a US court Tuesday it will seek damages of more than $2.5 billion from Samsung in a patent infringement case accusing the South Korean firm of copying the iPhone and iPad maker.

No truce in Apple-Samsung patent war

May 23, 2012

Two days of court-directed peace talks between the chiefs of iPhone-maker Apple and smartphone giant Samsung ended with no sign of a truce in the legal battle headed for court in Silicon Valley.

Samsung says Germany rejects Apple's sales ban bid

Feb 02, 2012

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Thursday a German court rejected Apple's bid to ban sales of its tablet computers and new smartphones, the latest chapter in a global legal battle between the rivals.

German court dismisses Apple, Samsung lawsuits

Mar 02, 2012

(AP) -- A German court has dismissed patent lawsuits by technology giants Apple and Samsung against each other in the two companies' battle over the market for smartphones and tablet devices.

Samsung files lawsuits against Apple

Apr 22, 2011

(AP) -- South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. says it sued Apple Inc. for patent rights violations, only days after Apple sued Samsung for the same reason. ...

Recommended for you

Hackerspaces used to turn ideas turn into reality

3 hours ago

At HeatSync Labs, the tables are littered with computer chips, pens, pads and tools while the room is abuzz with the chatter of would-be inventors hoping to change the world—or just make cool things. They are part of a ...

China Telecom profit rises as mobile data grows

3 hours ago

China Telecom Ltd., one of the country's three main state-owned carriers, said Wednesday its profit rose 11.8 percent in the first half of the year as its Internet and mobile data businesses grew.

Snapchat valued at $10 bln

4 hours ago

US media on Tuesday reported that Snapchat was valued at $10 billion based on funding pumped into the startup by a powerhouse Silicon Valley venture capital firm.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

IronhorseA
5 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2012
Let's see. App store ... Lindows (or Linspire). Touch screen that slides graphical elements off screen so you can see others that won't all fit onscreen ... 2002 'The Minority Report'. Cellphone that runs computer code ... Palm Pilot and RIM Blackberry.

So, exactly what original thought did Apple have other than to wait till the hardware was fast enough in a cellphone sized package to combine those three elements while letting the other companies use their own money creating the 'market' for the resulting product. Ah, and then overcharging for that product, then complaining when another company combines those same elements and can sell them for less... whaaaaaa. Apple, go join your founder.

BTW, did i mention Dick Tracy's watch ;P
mjlavall
3.4 / 5 (5) Jul 28, 2012
Well put, and what a sad world this would be if Apple was the only choice we had in the market.
NMvoiceofreason
not rated yet Jul 28, 2012
Let's see. App store ... Lindows (or Linspire). Touch screen that slides graphical elements off screen so you can see others that won't all fit onscreen ... 2002 'The Minority Report'. Cellphone that runs computer code ... Palm Pilot and RIM Blackberry.

So, exactly what original thought did Apple have other than to wait till the hardware was fast enough in a cellphone sized package to combine those three elements while letting the other companies use their own money creating the 'market' for the resulting product. Ah, and then overcharging for that product, then complaining when another company combines those same elements and can sell them for less... whaaaaaa. Apple, go join your founder.

BTW, did i mention Dick Tracy's watch ;P


Dick Tracy's watch was nothing more than Jule's Verne's cannon to the Moon - a literary device to tell a story. Never produced a working model. Likewise "Minority Report".

Lindows is a better example. Apple still takes credit for Xerox.
SatanLover
not rated yet Jul 28, 2012
microsoft tablet ages before ipad.
before that,

star trek tablets
star trek communicators
star trek medical devices
Shootist
Jul 28, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.