New Yorkers say gas drilling not worth the risk

Jun 11, 2012

More than half of New York state residents believe that the environmental risks of natural gas drilling outweigh the revenues produced by such activity, according to the latest Empire State Poll conducted by Cornell's Survey Research Institute.

Fully 52 percent of New Yorkers polled stated that the risks outweigh revenues for gas drilling, compared with 27 percent who believe the revenues outweigh the risks and 21 percent who did not know enough about the issue to form an opinion.

Cornell's Survey Research Institute polled New Yorkers about this issue in 2010 and 2011. During both polls, the share of New York residents who felt the environmental risks outweighed the revenue benefits was about twice that of residents who felt gas-drilling revenues outweighed the risks.

The poll also found that, statewide, an equal share (52 percent) of men and women believe that risks of gas drilling outweigh the monetary returns. Opinions on this issue diverged by region, race and : A greater share of downstate residents (54 percent) believe that risks outweigh revenues than their upstate (50 percent) counterparts. Similarly, 59 percent of non-white residents versus 50 percent of white residents say risks outweigh revenues.

Age and one's position on the political scale also had a bearing: Younger and more liberal New Yorkers tend to believe that the risks outweigh revenues. For example, 66 percent of self-described say risks outweigh revenues, compared with 47 percent of moderates and 41 percent of conservatives.

When decisions have to be made about gas drilling regulations, a clear majority (61 percent) agreed that local government should have control. This was consistent across upstate and downstate .

Explore further: Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New Yorkers divided on how to balance state budget

Jul 06, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Cornell's Survey Research Institute asked New Yorkers: If the state does not have enough money to balance its budget and pay for existing programs, would you raise taxes, cut state programs or borrow money?

Poll reveals public awareness of nanotech stuck at low level

Sep 25, 2007

National survey findings released today indicate that Americans’ awareness of nanotechnology remains low. Popular awareness is nearly as small as the tiny nanoscale materials and nano-enabled devices and products now flowing ...

Hormone replacement helps young women

Jan 26, 2007

The benefits of short-term hormone replacement therapy likely outweigh the risks for younger women, the Ohio-based North American Menopause Society said.

Recommended for you

Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

Aug 22, 2014

In an industrial area outside Kenya's capital city, workers in hard hats and white masks take shiny new power drills to computer parts. This assembly line is not assembling, though. It is dismantling some ...

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

Aug 22, 2014

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

Aug 22, 2014

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bertibus
1 / 5 (2) Jun 11, 2012
Has Cornell just released the numbers? It seems strange that results from a poll taken in 2010 /2011 are being published now.
Origin
1 / 5 (5) Jun 11, 2012
IMO for USA would be much more advantageous to invest into cold fusion research (which already provides the energy yield larger than 1400%!), than into further devastation of their life environment. But until this research will be ostracised with various influential individuals, than the Americans will have no other option, than the further exploitation of fossil fuel sources or the risky nuclear business.
CapitalismPrevails
2 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2012
OK, well New Yorkers don't need to use natural gas to heat their homes and I guess they don't need that extra tax revenue in their state either. It's not like their another blue state in fiscal crisis.
Water tables are typically at 3000 ft MAX below the surface. Natural gas drillers are going 5000-1000 feet.
Origin
1 / 5 (3) Jun 11, 2012
Water tables are typically at 3000 ft MAX below the surface. Natural gas drillers are going 5000-1000 feet.
The contaminations of water sources is very common during fracking.

http://energyboom...ommunity

http://www.scient...ter-burn

http://www.usatod...745004/1

For example, in Bradford district of Pensylvania the contamination of water occurred in 8 % of drills made in 2010.