Racial diversity increases, but segregation persists, says geography professor

Jun 20, 2012
As shown in this 2010 map, Atlanta is now more diverse, with a growing Latino population (represented in purple above). However, the city still exhibits signs of racial segregation. Credit: Mixedmetro.us

While census data shows racial diversity is increasing in major cities across the United States, highly diverse neighborhoods are still rare, newly arrived immigrants continue to settle in concentrated residential patterns, and many African Americans remain concentrated in segregated neighborhoods, according to recent research by Richard Wright, professor of geography and the Orvil E. Dryfoos Professor of Public Affairs.

Wright and two colleagues—Steven R. Holloway of the University of Georgia and Mark Ellis of the University of Washington—examined neighborhood tract data from the 1990, 2000, and 2010 U.S. censuses and created "cartographic visualizations" of 53 large metropolitan areas and every state in the United States. Their maps showing the changes in neighborhood racial configuration in these cities can be viewed here.

While there are no longer "that are all white or all black," Wright says segregation still persists. He recently published a paper in The Professional Geographer, "The Racially Fragmented City? Neighborhood Racial Segregation and Jointly Considered," co-authored by Holloway and Ellis. "Rather than thinking of segregation and diversity as being on a continuum, moving linearly between those two end points, our research admits to the possibility of folds in that continuum," says Wright, "the possibility that you can have segregation and diversity together in the same place at the same time, and increasing in similar places or decreasing in similar places."

Of the 53 metropolitan areas studied by Professor Wright, Atlanta has undergone some of the most significant demographic change over the last 20 years. The map above shows a predominately white (represented in orange above) and African American (represented in green above) population in 1990. Credit: Mixedmetro.us

As Wright explains in this accompanying video, his research evaluates neighborhoods' composition by examining the degree to which groups share residential space. This entails looking at census tracts, which are a unit of analysis the U.S. Census uses to define a neighborhood. After analyzing the data, he concluded that segregation has declined, as other scholars' research has suggested. However, Wright says his research shows that "we should be very cautious talking about the 21st century being the century of diversity or the end of a segregated century."

Wright says, "The trend we've seen is for predominantly white tracts to become more racially diverse. We've also seen an increase in the number of tracts that are Latino-dominated and undiverse, and a greater count of Asian-dominated tracts that are undiverse. And this is because of immigration. African Americans have a longer history of settlement in the . And while the number of low-diversity, African American neighborhoods has declined a little, it's nowhere near the same rate as low-diversity, white-dominated tracts. So old histories are getting rewritten in these metropolitan areas, but African Americans remain segregated."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
In a Dartmouth Now video interview, Professor Richard Wright says highly diverse neighborhoods are still rare and African American neighborhoods remain largely segregated. Credit: Dartmouth College

Atlanta, as Wright discusses in the video, has undergone enormous demographic change over the last 20 years. In 1990, the city was populated predominantly by whites and African Americans. Of a total of 658 tracts, 398 were classified as low-diversity white-dominant and 112 were low-diversity black-dominated tracts. "Atlanta was archetypically white suburbs and an African American central city, something you would see in Detroit, Pittsburgh, or Cincinnati today," says Wright.

However, between 1990 and 2000 low-diversity white-dominant tracts declined from 54 percent of all tracts to 29 percent. From 2000 to 2010, these areas declined an additional 49 percent, from 238 to 116. The 116 remaining low-diversity white-dominant tracts are now just 17.6 percent of all tracts in Atlanta, compared to 1990 when that class of tract comprised 60 percent of all neighborhoods.

The number of low-diversity black-dominant tracts went from 112 in 1990 to 123 in 2000. By 2010, the number had dropped slightly to 115, but there were still more low-density black-dominant tracts in 2010 than in 1990. There were no Atlanta neighborhoods where Latinos were numerically dominant in 1990, but by 2010 there were 31. And just two tracts were classed as highly racially diverse in 1990, but by 2010 there were 17.

"It's clear from our research that we still have problems to do with segregation," says Wright. "We can celebrate diversity, we can find diverse neighborhoods and identify them, but we should be very cautious about celebrating the end of any form of ."

Explore further: Personalized advertising attracts more attention, makes the contents of ads easier to remember

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study: Residential segregation still a problem in US

May 31, 2012

Despite increasing numbers of multiethnic neighborhoods in the United States, relatively few black or white families are actually moving into these types of communities, according to a new study in the June issue of the American So ...

Recommended for you

The psychology of gift-giving and receiving

3 hours ago

Gift exchanges can reveal how people think about others, what they value and enjoy, and how they build and maintain relationships. Researchers are exploring various aspects of gift-giving and receiving, such as how givers ...

Strong neighborhood ties can help reduce gun violence

5 hours ago

The bonds that tie a neighborhood together can help shield community members from gun violence, according to new findings by Yale School of Medicine researchers in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mike_Tanner
1 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2012
ASIANS FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2012
One way to stop this is for everyone to stop declaring any race information on census forms.
Vendicar_Decarian
not rated yet Jun 24, 2012
Absolutely. Because as everyone understands the census causes segregation.

"One way to stop this is for everyone to stop declaring any race information on census forms." - RyggTard

What a moron.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2012
Once the socialist took power in the USSR, they attempted to homogenize by forcing the Europeans to move to Asia and Asians to move to Europe.
Yugoslavia was created to homogenize the Balkins.
But when socialist are NOT in power, they make all attempts to pit once race against another, one economic class against another.
One good way to oppose socialist power grabs is to refuse to participate in their divide and conquer methods.
Vendicar_Decarian
not rated yet Jun 24, 2012
Once the aliens take over they will force the Texans to move to MetaLuna and the Martians to move to Texas.

"Once the socialist took power in the USSR, they attempted to homogenize by forcing the Europeans to move to Asia and Asians to move to Europe." - Ryggtard

Poor RyggTard. Somehow it all makes sense to his confused mind. Even though his quack Tard liedeology is self contradictory nonsense.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.