Peru needs glacier loss monitoring: dire UN warning

Jun 04, 2012 by Roberto Cortijo
Part of the Pastoruri snowcapped mountain in the central Peruvian Andes, 450 km east of Lima. Peru needs a permanent monitoring system to gauge Andean mountain glacier shrinkage caused by global warming and its effect on people who depend on the ice for water.

Peru needs a permanent monitoring system to gauge Andean mountain glacier shrinkage caused by global warming and its effect on people who depend on the ice for water, UN experts warned.

"We have spoken with Peruvian government institutions, and there is no sufficient monitoring system to tell us the current trend in glacier shrinkage, and its consequences," said Anil Mishra, a UNESCO specialist in hydrological systems.

Mishra took part this week in a conference called "Impact of Glacier Retreat in the Andes" with Thomas Shaaf, of Germany, who leads the UNESCO biodiversity science department. It aimed to deliver policy recommendations to regional governments.

"We are in Peru to work with scientists from the region, with their specialists, to identify and understand the process of glacier shrinkage," Mishra added.

Experts say the should include scientists, high-tech equipment and hydrologists to identify the degree of ice melting, the degree to which rivers fed by them are losing ; and which down-mountain areas will be affected by the loss of water supplies and how much.

"In the Andes, runoff from glaciated basins is an important element of the regional , and is essential to the integrity of mountain ecosystems," UNESCO said in a statement on the gathering last week.

A 2009 World Bank report said that in the last 35 years, Peru's glaciers have shrunk by 22 percent, leading to a 12 percent loss in the amount of fresh water reaching the coast, home to most of the desert country's citizens who depend on the water supplies downstream.

And the local Glacier Science Office has reported that the glaciers in the Cordillera Blanca in northern Peru, the highest tropical mountain chain in the world, have shrunk by 30 percent in the past 40 years due to climate change.

"The scientific community and governments have got to understand what the consequences will be for river systems when the glaciers no longer exist," Mishra warned.

Shaaf added that with the passing years there is less snow falling on the high mountains even as the ice is shrinking "and so less water is going into river systems, even if the population has not felt it yet.

Many scientists believe that with , rain cycles will speed up and rains will be heavier in tropical and already wet areas but that dry and semiarid areas will see less and less precipitation.

Peru's population is almost 30 million.

Explore further: Feds protect 20 species of coral as threatened

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Climate change halves Peru glacier: official

Feb 23, 2011

A glacier on Peru's Huaytapallana Moutain shed half its surface ice in just 23 years, officials said Wednesday, reinforcing concerns of climate change's growing threat to fresh water resources.

Glacial tap is open but the water will run dry

Dec 20, 2011

Glaciers are retreating at an unexpectedly fast rate according to research done in Peru's Cordillera Blanca by McGill doctoral student Michel Baraer. They are currently shrinking by about one per cent a year, and that percentage ...

Scientists expect increased melting of mountain glaciers

Jan 20, 2006

Sea level rise due to increased melting of mountain glaciers and polar ice caps will be much lower in the 21st Century than previously estimated. However, decay of mountain glaciers in due to global warming will be much more ...

Shrinking glaciers threaten China

Nov 02, 2007

China's glaciers in western Xinjiang Uygur region are shrinking alarmingly due to global and regional warming, posing a threat to the oases in the area.

Climate change: Water reservoir glacier

Nov 08, 2010

Glaciers of large mountain regions contribute, to some extent considerably, to the water supply of certain populated areas. However, in a recent study conducted by Innsbruck glaciologists and climatologists ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
1 / 5 (1) Jun 05, 2012
Why? The glaciers are going and it is time for the people to move forward too, in whichever way seems the best for the communities effected.
I wonder if the locals who have lived beside the Peruvian glaciers for generations have any doubt about which way the glacier faces are moving.