Parasitic flowers 'steal' more genes from their hosts than previously thought: study

Jun 06, 2012
BMC Genomics reveals that the Malaysian parasitic plant Rafflesia cantleyi has "stolen" genes from its host Tetrastigma rafflesiae. Credit: Matt Klooster

In a finding that could fundamentally re-write science's understanding of how some parasite-host relationships work, Harvard researchers have found that, despite being separated by more than 100 million years of evolution, the parasitic "corpse flower" found in southeast Asian rainforests appears to share large parts of its genome with its host vines, members of the grapevine family.

The two plants share parts of their genome, researchers believe, through a process known as "horizontal ". As opposed to vertical transfer, in which a parent passes genes to their offspring, horizontal transfer occurs when genes are passed between organisms without .

As described in the June 6 issue of in a study that was co-lead with Stony Brook University, researchers found that this type of genetic sharing between these two plants is much more widespread than first suspected, and that some genes borrowed by the flowers are likely functional, and had perhaps replaced vertically inherited copies. The surprising finding, Charles Davis, Professor of Organismic and and Curator of Vascular Plants in the Harvard University Herbaria, said, suggests that the process may convey some to the flowers, which are the largest flowers in the world.

"We found that several dozen actively transcribed genes likely originated from the flower's host," said Zhenxiang Xi, a graduate student in Davis' lab, and first author of the paper. "In addition, we found evidence that about one third of the parasites own vertically inherited genes have evolved to be more like those of hosts, suggesting that there might be a fitness benefit to maintaining genes that are more host-like."

"At the outset, we wondered if it could be that a subset of these genes might provide some defense from the host mounting an attack," Davis added. "However, the genes coming to the flowers represent a broad swath of functions, including , metabolism and perhaps some useful for defense. If so, these findings might reflect a sort of genomic camouflage, or genomic mimicry for the parasite."

The new paper builds on research Davis conducted in 2004, just before coming to Harvard, which focused on understanding the evolutionary origins of such "extremeophiles."

"For years, these plants have been something of an evolutionary mystery, because they simply don't possess the genetic toolkit – primarily the genes associated with photosynthesis - that evolutionary biologists have used to place them on the broader tree of life," Davis said. "These plants have reduced themselves so much, they've actually lost many of the genes associated with photosynthesis."

Using newly developed genomic tools, he identified the plants that are the closest relatives of the enormous flowers, but also stumbled into something surprising - a single region in the flower's genetic code that was more like its host than itself.

The realization that the flowers and vines appeared to be related, Davis said, was a "eureka moment."

"These species are quite evolutionarily diverged from one another, yet they have a very close, intimate physical proximity," he said. "The parasite literally cannot live without being inside the host. Our study was one of the first to show that parasitic systems characterized by close physical contact are an area where horizontal gene transfer is taking place."

Knowing that horizontal gene transfer was happening, however, was only part of the story. Left unanswered, he said, were questions about the magnitude of these transfers, what type of genes were moving, whether those genes were functional in the flowers, and to what extent vertically inherited genes may have been replaced by horizontally acquired ones.

"Following the 2004 study, there was a great deal of momentum behind the idea that the parasite-host relationship was a hotbed of activity for horizontal gene transfer," Davis said. "But no one had tackled this question in a broad systematic way. Our paper was the first to hit this problem, and what we found was is gene transfer is indeed prevalent in these parasites, and that some of those genes are likely functional."

Davis' research didn't stop at the genes the flowers adopted from their host. In examining the vertically inherited genes of the parasite– that is, those inherited from a parent – they found that the molecular coding between the parasites were strikingly similar to those of its host. Put simply, he said, the are "learning to speak the genetic language" of their hosts, and not simply acquiring their genes.

"What we think is that the genes in the parasite are independently converging on the genetic coding of the host," he said. "Of course, in this case it's more likely easier to acquire through if your own genetic machinery is more like your host, but when we started to find these patterns, it amazed me. If true, it's a pretty diabolical strategy on the part of the parasite."

Explore further: Brain circuit differences reflect divisions in social status

More information: Horizontal transfer of expressed genes in a parasitic flowering plant. Zhenxiang Xi, Robert K Bradley, Kenneth J Wurdack, K.M. Wong, M. Sugumaran, Kirsten Bomblies, Joshua S Rest and Charles C Davis BMC Genomics (in press)

Related Stories

Gene found to have jumped from gut bacteria to beetle

Feb 28, 2012

( -- Genes jumping between bacteria are rather common which in part explains their ability to rapidly develop immunity to antibacterial agents. What’s not so common are examples of genes jumping ...

Plant Parasite 'Wiretaps' Host

Jul 30, 2008

A parasitic plant that sucks water and nutrients from its plant host also taps into its communications traffic, a new report finds. The research could lead to new ways to combat parasites that attack crop plants.

Aphids borrowed bacterial genes to play host

Mar 09, 2009

Most aphids host mutualistic bacteria, Buchnera aphidicola, which live inside specialized cells called bacteriocytes. Buchnera are vital to the aphids well being as they provide essential amino acids that are scarce in its ...

Picky-eater Flies Losing Smell Genes

Apr 02, 2007

A UC Davis researcher is hot on the scent of some lost fruit fly genes. According to population biology graduate student Carolyn McBride, the specialist fruit fly Drosophila sechellia is losing genes for smell and taste receptors ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.3 / 5 (4) Jun 06, 2012
'Stealing' genes? That could be accurate only if the host has lost those genes completely to the parasite. If the host still possesses the same genes, then the parasite merely copied the genes without removing them from the host. Also, IMHO, the evolutionary speculation contributes noting to the article as, for example, if the parasite allegedly once possessed genes similar to the ones it is now copying from the host, what kind of evolution is that? To me, always trying to relate every observation to evolutionary speculation is like religious people endeavoring to relate everything they observe to action by God. Why not just stick with the observed scientific facts and see where they take us?