Race against time: When a minute lasts 61 seconds

Jun 28, 2012 by Laurent Banguet
An installation of clocks by French artist Arman in Paris in March. Horologists around the world on Saturday will carry out one of the weirdest operations of their profession: they will hold back time.

Horologists around the world on Saturday will carry out one of the weirdest operations of their profession: they will hold back time.

The last minute of June 30, 2012 is destined to be 61 seconds long, for timekeepers are to add a "leap second" to compensate for the wibbly-wobbly movements of our world.

The ever-so-brief halting of the second hand will compensate for a creeping divergence from solar , meaning the period required for Earth to complete a day.

The planet takes just over 86,400 seconds for a 360-degree revolution.

But it wobbles on its axis and is affected by the of the Sun and Moon and the , all of which brake the rotation by a tiny sliver of a second.

As a result, Earth gets out of step with International Atomic Time (TAI), which uses the pulsation of atoms to measure time to an accuracy of several billionths of a second.

To avoid and TAI moving too far apart, the widely used indicator of (UTC) is adjusted every so often to give us the odd 86,401-second day.

The adjustments began in 1972. Before then, time was measured exclusively by the position of the Sun or stars in relation to Earth, expressed in (GMT) or its successor UT1.

This will be the 25th intervention to add a "leap second" to UTC.

"Today, time is constructed, defined and measured with that are infinitely more stable than astronomical time," Noel Dimarcq, director of the SYRTE time-space reference system at the told AFP.

"This allows us to ensure that everyone on Earth is on the exact same time."

TAI is kept by several hundred atomic clocks around the world, measuring fluctuations in the atom of the chemical element that allows them to divide a single second into 10 billion smaller bits.

With such precision, "only one (atomic) second is lost every 300 million years," said Dimarcq.

Every time the discrepancy between TAI and UT1 becomes too big, the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) jumps into action and announces a "leap second" -- usually several months in advance.

The extra second is added to UTC, also known as Zulu time, only ever at midnight, either on a December 31 or a June 30.

Time-catching is as irregular as the Earth's rotation itself. The last three adjustments were in 2008, 2005 and 1998. The year 1972 saw two additions, followed the next seven years by a second every year.

The vast majority of the world's seven billion people are likely to be blithely indifferent to Saturday's change, except for a few who may note the curious fact that they will live a second longer.

But among scientists, the issue is not without importance.

The leap second has long caused debate among member countries of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), with some arguing for it to be abolished in favour of the exclusive use of atomic time.

Every time a second is added, the world's computers need to be manually adjusted, a costly practice that also boosts the risk of error.

High-precision systems such as satellites and some data networks will have to factor in the leap second or risk provoking a calculation catastrophe.

For this reason, rocket launches are never scheduled for leap-second dates.

Explore further: Why is Venus so horrible?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Countries consider time out on the 'leap second'

Jan 17, 2012

It's high noon for the humble leap second. After ten years of talks, governments are headed for a showdown vote this week on an issue that pits technological precision against nature's whims.

Scientists meet to discuss usefulness of GMT

Nov 03, 2011

Leading scientists from around the world are meeting in Britain from Thursday to consider a proposal that could eventually see Greenwich Mean Time relegated to a footnote in history.

Extra tick restarts time, tech debate

Dec 26, 2005

Time marches on and so does the debate over whether a "leap second" does any good in helping Earth catch up with the world's atomic clocks.

Recommended for you

SDO captures images of two mid-level flares

16 hours ago

The sun emitted a mid-level flare on Dec. 18, 2014, at 4:58 p.m. EST. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory, which watches the sun constantly, captured an image of the event. Solar flares are powerful bursts ...

Why is Venus so horrible?

23 hours ago

Venus sucks. Seriously, it's the worst. The global temperature is as hot as an oven, the atmospheric pressure is 90 times Earth, and it rains sulfuric acid. Every part of the surface of Venus would kill you ...

Image: Christmas wrapping the Sentinel-3A antenna

Dec 19, 2014

The moment a team of technicians, gowned like hospital surgeons, wraps the Sentinel-3A radar altimeter in multilayer insulation to protect it from the temperature extremes found in Earth orbit.

Video: Flying over Becquerel

Dec 19, 2014

This latest release from the camera on ESA's Mars Express is a simulated flight over the Becquerel crater, showing large-scale deposits of sedimentary material.

Spinning up a dust devil on Mars

Dec 19, 2014

Spinning up a dust devil in the thin air of Mars requires a stronger updraft than is needed to create a similar vortex on Earth, according to research at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH).

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.