A geographical look at sex offender policies

Jun 12, 2012
Maximum possible distribution of sex offender residences based on a spatial proximity restriction between offenders.

A March 2011 news posting from Kingman, Ariz., reports that a convicted sex offender broke into a home, kidnapped an eight-year-old girl, and molested her outside. Such an unfortunate event and others like it have spawned a flurry of sex offender laws at the federal, state and local levels in recent years designed to prevent this type of incident. Common strategies range from sex offender registries and other public notification to spatial restriction zones.

Restriction zones are meant to prohibit offenders from residing either too close to sensitive facilities, such as schools and , or too close to other offenders. The goal is to minimize community vulnerability as well as limit potential contact with children and other at-risk groups.

These legislative efforts are not without controversy, however, and opponents of these laws argue that restrictions produce unintended or collateral consequences for offenders that range from public shaming to the lack of affordable housing options. In this respect, spatial restriction zones are the subject of much attention because they are believed to reduce housing options for offenders and produce sex offender clusters in the few areas where offenders are permitted to reside.

Geographical analysis can provide useful decision support tools to help craft and evaluate sex offender policies, argue Alan Murray, Serge Rey, Luc Anselin and Elizabeth Mack of ASU’s School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and Marie Griffin of ASU’s School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, along with co-investigator Tony Grubesic of Drexel University’s College of Information Science and Technology.

A recent article in Cityscape is the culmination of research on this topic funded by a two-year $250,000 grant from the National Science Foundation that produced some 14 articles. The paper provides an overview of how residency laws interact with local geography and city forms, creating both intended and unintended outcomes. The key lesson to be gleaned from this body of research is the highly contextual nature of restriction zone impacts and the utility of geographic analysis in assessing laws before they are enacted.

Professor Murray notes that “our research found that about 65 percent of registered offenders changed residences over a two-and-a-half year study period.” He adds that “what is particularly curious about these moves is that approximately one-third of them were into spatial restriction zones, or rather areas that are deemed off limits to convicted sex offenders. Some might consider this predatory.”

Explore further: New 'Surveyman' software promises to revolutionize survey design and accuracy

More information: www.lvrj.com/news/sex-offender… izona-118685479.html

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study casts doubt on sex offender notification laws

Oct 05, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- While evidence suggests that requiring convicted sex offenders to register with the police reduces the chances they'll re-offend, a recent paper co-authored by a University of Michigan law professor shows ...

'App' maps homes of known sex offenders

Aug 13, 2009

Parents worried about sexual offenders have a new tool for when they're not at their computers: an iPhone app developed by a Longwood, Fla., company.

GPS monitoring of Arizona sex offenders

Aug 08, 2011

The use of GPS technology to monitor sex offenders should be viewed as a tool rather than a control mechanism, a team of researchers at Sam Houston State University found in a recent study.

Recommended for you

World population likely to peak by 2070

Oct 23, 2014

World population will likely peak at around 9.4 billion around 2070 and then decline to around 9 billion by 2100, according to new population projections from IIASA researchers, published in a new book, World Population and ...

Bullying in schools is still prevalent, national report says

Oct 23, 2014

Despite a dramatic increase in public awareness and anti-bullying legislation nationwide, the prevalence of bullying is still one of the most pressing issues facing our nation's youth, according to a report by researchers ...

Study examines effects of credentialing, personalization

Oct 23, 2014

Chris Gamrat, a doctoral student in learning, design and technology, recently had his study—completed alongside Heather Zimmerman, associate professor of education; Jaclyn Dudek, a doctoral student studying learning, design ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Jun 12, 2012
A new paradigm of incarceration is needed. Many people who are incarcerated do not need to be isolated from the community - mainly drug users and others whose crimes harm noone else. These people need 'rehabilitation' in the sense of treatment for substance abuse.
OTOH, protection of the community at large requires that criminals proven to be dangerous (drug dealers, drug smugglers, and those who are violent or sexually abusive, especially against strangers) should be isolated from the community, at least until they can be *proven* to be safe (as if that can ever happen).