Experts call for strong regulation and peer review of military and civilian nuclear programs

Jun 07, 2012
This is George Shultz (left) and Sidney Drell, Stanford University. Credit: L.A. Cicero, Stanford News Service

All nuclear energy and weapons programs should be independently regulated and subject to rigorous peer review, according to three experts on nuclear policy. Their comments and recommendations are published in an article entitled, "A Safer Nuclear Enterprise," in the June 8 issue of the journal Science.

The authors noted that, despite international diplomatic efforts to prevent the proliferation of and ensure that nuclear material is protected against theft, there is growing apprehension about terrorists acquiring weapons or nuclear material.

"There is growing risk of accidents, mistakes or miscalculations, and of regional wars or nuclear terrorism," wrote Sidney Drell, George P. Shultz and Steven P. Andreasen. "Strong, independent regulatory agencies are not the norm in many countries."

The three authors are leading experts on global nuclear issues, who have also held top policy positions at the White House. Drell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and professor emeritus of at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford University, served on the President's Intelligence Advisory Board from 1993 to 2001.

Shultz, a distinguished fellow at the Hoover Institution and member of the Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy at Stanford, was U.S. Secretary of State during the Reagan Administration.

Andreasen, a lecturer at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota, was director for defense policy and arms control on the White House National Security Council from 1993 to 2001. He is a consultant to the Nuclear Threat Initiative in Washington, D.C.

"No nation is immune from risks involving nuclear weapons and nuclear power," they wrote. "Since 1945 there have been more than 30 acknowledged serious accidents involving U.S. nuclear weapons. The United States has had an admirable safety record in civil nuclear power since the 1979 Three Mile Island accident, yet some reactors have a short window for restoring power following an accident. The Fukushima disaster [in Japan] demonstrates the urgent need to address this issue."

To reduce the risks of nuclear accidents and terrorism, the authors recommended that every country involved in nuclear energy and weapons development establish a system of independent regulation and peer review.

"States new to the nuclear enterprise may not have effective safeguards to secure nuclear weapons and materials or the capability to safely manage and regulate civil reactors," they noted. Strengthening the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and increasing its budget so that it can play a greater role in civil nuclear safety and security would help reduce risks.

"In the United States, the nuclear regulatory system – in particular, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) – is credited with setting a high standard for independent regulation of the civil nuclear power sector," they wrote. "But careful attention is required to protect against regulatory capture by vested interests in government and industry; the latter funds a high percentage of the NRC budget."

The authors also urged adoption of U.S.-style of independent peer review.

"Independent experts in the United States, both within and outside the weapons program, review each other, rigorously challenge weapons and systems safety, and communicate these points up and down the line," they wrote. "The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations provides peer review and oversight of the U.S. civil nuclear sector. Its global counterpart, the World Association of Nuclear Operators, should further strengthen its safety operations, in particular its peer-review process. Enhanced capacity to arrange fines could also help states develop the culture of quality needed to achieve a superior safety record."

The authors called for improved dialogue between the military and nuclear energy communities, and greater public awareness and involvement in nuclear issues.

Ultimately, they would like to see a global effort to eliminate all nuclear weaponry. "Progress toward a world free of nuclear weapons will build international trust and cooperation required to address dangers and prevent catastrophes," they wrote.

Explore further: Lenovo's smart glasses prototype has battery at neck

Related Stories

U. S. envisions a new generation of nuclear weapons

Mar 19, 2007

Almost 62 years after detonation of the first atomic bombs, the United States is considering controversial proposals to produce a new generation of nuclear weapons and revamp its nuclear weapons complex, according to an article ...

Eliminating the threat of nuclear arms

Feb 04, 2009

President Barack Obama has made his intention of eliminating all nuclear weapons a tenet of his administration's foreign policy. Professor Sidney Drell, a US theoretical physicist and arms-control expert, explains in February's ...

Recommended for you

Lenovo's smart glasses prototype has battery at neck

1 hour ago

China's PC giant Lenovo last week offered a peek at its Google Glass-competing smart glass prototype, further details of which are to be announced in October. Lenovo's glasses prototype is not an extreme ...

Google searches hold key to future market crashes

3 hours ago

A team of researchers from Warwick Business School and Boston University have developed a method to automatically identify topics that people search for on Google before subsequent stock market falls.

Amazon launches 3D printing store

3 hours ago

Amazon announced Monday the launch of an online store for 3D printed items to allow consumers to customize and personalize items like earrings, pendants, dolls and other objects.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dschlink
5 / 5 (3) Jun 07, 2012
These "independent experts" really need to stop discussing weapons and power generation as if they are the same thing and need the same type of controls. This attitude has hobbled the development of Gen III and Gen IV reactors in much of the world.

As another article observed: total number of people killed by the Fukushima disaster - zero, number to date who have died because of the lack of power in Japan during the current heatwave: 26.
Gino
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 08, 2012
All we hear about is "nuclear disaster" as though it was much more significent than 15,000 or so people killed by the tsunami.
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (3) Jun 08, 2012
Gino is right. Disasters of all sort should be avoided.

Nuclear disaster is just one of many. And one that until recently the nuclear establishment claimed would never occur.
NotAsleep
5 / 5 (1) Jun 08, 2012
The programs we're most concerned about are in countries that would keep their programs secret anyway...
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) Jun 08, 2012
These "independent experts" really need to stop discussing weapons and power generation as if they are the same thing and need the same type of controls. This attitude has hobbled the development of Gen III and Gen IV reactors in much of the world.

As another article observed: total number of people killed by the Fukushima disaster - zero, number to date who have died because of the lack of power in Japan during the current heatwave: 26.


Except for that the nature of a relatively low level of contamination can, and will, take years to play out. What will be the casualty count from various cancers, birth defects, and various other unspecified maladies in the next five years? Ten years? Twenty five years?
geral
not rated yet Jun 28, 2012
Serve the United States military and upon return home be targeted by fbi/cia/police/military intelligence/doj as an insane experimental dog.

http://www.opedne...134.html

http://phillyimc....l-sosbee

http://www.sosbee...a18.html

http://www.sosbee...for.html