(AP) A European court on Wednesday upheld most of a massive fine levied against Microsoft by the European Commission's competition watchdog, closing a case against the software giant that began in 1998.
In an appeals ruling, the General Court of the European Union rejected Microsoft Corp.'s request to dismiss the fine levied in 2008, but did trim it by 39 million to 860 million ($1.1 billion). Counting two earlier fines, the case has wound up costing Microsoft a grand total of 1.64 billion.
That's the most ever resulting from a single antitrust case in Europe, though in 2009 Intel Corp. was hit with the largest single fine, 1.09 billion.
The court in Luxembourg said its decision "essentially upholds the Commission's decision and rejects all the arguments put forward by Microsoft in support of annulment."
The 860 million fine is a "penalty for noncompliance" with the watchdog's 2004 order for Microsoft to make computer programming code available that would allow competitors' products to interface properly with Microsoft's server software.
Microsoft did so, but at a price the Commission said was so exorbitant it amounted to not complying.
The court upheld that finding, but said Microsoft deserved a small break because of a letter the Commission sent in 2005 saying the company didn't have to freely distribute code that wasn't its own and was freely available elsewhere. That letter gave Microsoft some room to think it was okay to continue acting the way it had until 2004, and should have been "taken into account in determining the gravity of the conduct found to be unlawful," the written decision said.
The Commission's top regulator Joaquin Almunia said the judgment "fully vindicates" his office's action against Microsoft and "brought significant benefits to users."
"A range of innovative products that would otherwise not have seen the light of day were introduced on the market," thanks to the Commission, he said.
Microsoft was less enthusiastic.
"Although the General Court slightly reduced the fine, we are disappointed with the Court's ruling," the company said in a statement.
Microsoft was initially fined 497 along with the 2004 order, then it was penalized another 280.5 million for noncompliance in 2006, and then another 899 million in 2008.
The company has already booked provisions for all the fines and penalties and after the ruling it has no active outstanding quarrels with European regulators.
"In 2009 Microsoft entered into a broad understanding with the Commission that resolved its competition law concerns," the company said.
Most notably in the 2009 deal, Microsoft ended an investigation into allegedly abusive practices for bundling its Internet Explorer web browser along with its operating systems. Microsoft agreed to instead offer customers a range of browsers to choose from.
In a sign of the times, Microsoft itself turned to the watchdog in 2012, asking it to investigate Google Inc. for anticompetitive practices. Microsoft alleged that Google was demanding unreasonable fees to license its technologies and asking courts to pull Microsoft products from shelves if they don't pay up. Google shot back with a similar request for the Commission to again investigate Microsoft last month.
Many observers say companies such as Apple Inc., Google and Microsoft are increasingly acting as "patent trolls," using the legal and regulatory systems as tools to thwart competitors as part of their wider struggle for market share.
Almunia said in February "the Commission will continue to keep a close eye on the behavior of all market players in the sector, particularly the increasingly strategic use of patents."
Key dates in EU antitrust action against Microsoft
A European appeals court on Wednesday upheld most of a massive penalty levied against Microsoft Corp., ending the company's 14-year legal struggle with the continent's competition regulators.
The EU probe was triggered by a 1998 complaint that Microsoft wouldn't give Sun Microsystems some technical information needed for Sun's server software to communicate with Microsoft's Windows desktop operating system. The EU looked more broadly into whether Microsoft had abused its near-monopoly over Windows to corner other markets, including server software, internet browsers and streaming media software.
Here's how the case developed:
March 24, 2004: The European Commission finds Microsoft guilty. It fines the company 497 million ($613 million). It also orders Microsoft to share technical documents with rivals and market a version of Windows without a media player.
June 15, 2005: After losing an appeal, Microsoft makes Windows XP N without Media Player available. There are few takers. The same month, EU also raises concerns about usability of Microsoft's technical documents.
July 12, 2006: EU decides Microsoft isn't obeying the 2004 decision and penalizes it an additional 280.5 million ($357 million).
March 1, 2007: EU threatens Microsoft with even more penalties as it accuses the company of further noncompliance by setting royalty fees too high for technical documents.
Oct. 22: Microsoft agrees to slash fees for the technical documents. It also offers access to open source developers and others for a one-time fee of 10,000. Though this resolves key parts of the dispute, the EU says Microsoft is still subject to penalties for noncompliance until then.
Jan. 14, 2008: Following a complaint by Web browser developer Opera Software ASA, the EU announces it is investigating Microsoft again. This time, it's on suspicion of abusing its market position by squeezing out other Internet browsers and software rivals dependent on Microsoft programs.
Feb. 27: EU regulators impose a 899 million penalty ($1.3 billion) a record at the time for failing to fully comply with the 2004 antitrust order. This is on top of the fine imposed in 2004 and the penalty of 2006 and brings the total to nearly 1.7 billion.
May 9: Microsoft announces it has appealed the penalty.
Jan. 16, 2009: The European Commission orders Microsoft to untie its Internet Explorer browser from Windows.
July 24: Microsoft agrees to offer a choice of rival Web browsers on Windows to ward off new European Union antitrust fines.
Dec. 16: The European Union drops the browser case after Microsoft after the company agrees to give Windows users in Europe a choice of up to 12 other Web browsers. This ends all of the EU's active cases against Microsoft, though the appeal of the 2008 fine remains pending.
Wednesday: The General Court of the European Union rejects Microsoft's appeal of the 2008 penalty, but reduces it to 860 million, ending the case.
Explore further: Banjo's ability to track events in real time gives clients competitive edge