(Phys.org) -- Religions are thought to serve as bulwarks against unethical behaviors. However, when it comes to predicting criminal behavior, the specific religious beliefs one holds is the determining factor, says a University of Oregon psychologist.
The study, appearing in the Public Library of Science journal PLoS ONE, found that criminal activity is higher in societies where people's religious beliefs contain a strong punitive component than in places where religious beliefs are more benevolent. A country where many more people believe in heaven than in hell, for example, is likely to have a much higher crime rate than one where these beliefs are about equal. The finding surfaced from a comprehensive analysis of 26 years of data involving 143,197 people in 67 countries.
"The key finding is that, controlling for each other, a nation's rate of belief in hell predicts lower crime rates, but the nation's rate of belief in heaven predicts higher crime rates, and these are strong effects," said Azim F. Shariff, professor of psychology and director of the Culture and Morality Lab at the UO. "I think it's an important clue about the differential effects of supernatural punishment and supernatural benevolence. The finding is consistent with controlled research we've done in the lab, but here shows a powerful 'real world' effect on something that really affects people -- crime."
Last year, in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Shariff reported that undergraduate students were more likely to cheat when they believe in a forgiving God than a punishing God.
Religious belief generally has been viewed as "a monolithic construct," Shariff said. "Once you split religion into different constructs, you begin to see different relationships. In this study, we found two differences that go in opposite directions. If you look at overall religious belief, these separate directions are washed out and you don't see anything. There's no hint of a relationship."
The new findings, he added, fit into a growing body of evidence that supernatural punishment had emerged as a very effective cultural innovation to get people to act more ethically with each other. In 2003, he said, Harvard University researchers Robert J. Barro and Rachel M. McCleary had found that gross domestic product was higher in developed countries when people believed in hell more than they did in heaven.
"Supernatural punishment across nations seems to predict lower crime rates," Shariff said. "At this stage, we can only speculate about mechanisms, but it's possible that people who don't believe in the possibility of punishment in the afterlife feel like they can get away with unethical behavior. There is less of a divine deterrent."
He added, however, that these are correlational data, and so caution should be taken with the conclusions. Though Shariff and study co-author Mijke Rhemtulla of the Center for Research Methods and Data Analysis at the University of Kansas tried to account for obvious alternative explanations, more research is needed to explore other interpretations for the findings.
"This research provides new insights into the potential influences of cultural and religious beliefs on key outcomes at a societal level," said Kimberly Andrews Espy, vice president for research and innovation. "Although these findings may be controversial, dissecting the associations between specific belief systems and epidemiologic behaviors is an important first step for social scientists to disentangle the complex web of factors that motivate human behavior."
Explore further:
Study: Religious belief declines in Britain

wiyosaya
3.7 / 5 (10) Jun 19, 2012Then if you believe in hell and a punishment in the afterlife, people are more likely to be civil to each other.
IMHO, it is unfortunate that religion is bent in this manner - where benevolent religion is seen as a haven where you can do anything you want and not expect punishment in the afterlife.
I also think it even more unfortunate that people need hell at all to be civil to each other. Somewhere, it seems to me, there is a complete disconnect between being a good person and being religious, and that is why I think many religions are losing followers as many religions seem entirely hypocritical.
Deathclock
3.3 / 5 (21) Jun 19, 2012TkClick
2 / 5 (8) Jun 19, 2012Deathclock
3.3 / 5 (24) Jun 19, 2012If you are a moral human being you act morally on your own accord.
Maat
3.2 / 5 (18) Jun 19, 2012Well said. The fact that Christians represent an overwhelming majority of the prison population in the United States (adjusted per-capita of course) only further drives this point home.
Moral men and women have no need for the archaic rules of Christianity.
Alaric
3.3 / 5 (8) Jun 19, 2012Alaric
2.5 / 5 (13) Jun 19, 2012If you read the paper you will see that they don't examine the relationship where they only look at a belief in hell without including belief in heaven. If they did this, I suspect that they would get either no significant effect or a mildly negative impact of religion on crime rates. This is because the belief in heaven is highly correlated with belief in hell (about 80-90%).
This is a problem known as multicollinearity between
and it means that the statistical method they use (OLS) inflates the relationship between belief in heaven and crime in one direction while driving the relationship between belief in hell and crime in the other direction. BAD BAD PAPER.
That would only be the beginning of a list of criticisms each of which is sufficient to disregard the paper as close to meaningless.
rwinners
2 / 5 (8) Jun 19, 2012I'm sure someone notable said that......
TheGhostofOtto1923
2.9 / 5 (30) Jun 19, 2012Perhaps they think god knows what is in their hearts and will forgive their sins because they believe in him? Or some similar nonsense?
TheGhostofOtto1923
2.9 / 5 (30) Jun 19, 2012http://holysmoke....-pri.htm
-The religious often have their own set of moral precepts, and do not recognize crimes against those with other beliefs as immoral.
And of course there is the primary disconnect of accepting that spirits can grant wishes and provide immortality, which indicates diminished judgment.
Alaric
4.4 / 5 (7) Jun 19, 2012Holysmoke puts Judeo-Christians as making up 83% of the prison population. But 80% of the US population are Judeo Christian. Not a particularly big divergence. From the CIA factbook:
Protestant 51.3%, Roman Catholic 23.9%, Mormon 1.7%, other Christian 1.6%, Jewish 1.7%, Buddhist 0.7%, Muslim 0.6%, other or unspecified 2.5%, unaffiliated 12.1%, none 4% (2007 est.)
It does look like good old Atheists are underrepresented in Prison (there should be twenty times more atheists) but I suspect that this is confounded by the fact that atheists tend to be affluent relative to the rest of the population (particularly in the US).
MandoZink
3.5 / 5 (8) Jun 20, 2012CardacianNeverid
3.1 / 5 (13) Jun 20, 2012Bullshit! Education and critical thinking is the bulwark for ethical behaviors and much more besides.
TheGhostofOtto1923
2.9 / 5 (25) Jun 20, 2012Add to this all the religion-caused strife around the world and I would have to conclude that religionist morality is a detriment.
How many crooks are active religionists? Hard to say. How many were praying that they wouldn't get caught, and are now praying they survive to get out? Hard to say.
OwaisVasundhara
4 / 5 (8) Jun 20, 2012OwaisVasundhara
3.4 / 5 (5) Jun 20, 2012MandoZink
5 / 5 (6) Jun 20, 2012Absolutely! As an atheist, you discover you have to answer to yourself for what you do to others. You cannot be unjust and expect to get off the hook by having an omnipotent supreme being to forgive you for the devils influence. It is YOU who must maintain integrity. That is what most Christians get completely backwards.
Integrity, understanding, and empathy for the human condition are the hallmarks of character that enlightened beings come to realize. Those awakened to intelligent atheism understand that this recognition of human quality is essential to a sane, compassionate, and universally moral society. ALL good people, both atheists and theists, should realize this
beyondApsis
4.5 / 5 (8) Jun 20, 2012Specifically what kind of hell? Is hell supposed to be one place? Is it Satan's homebase of evil operations?
I find it entirely bizarre that one can believe in an "omnipotent" god and also a devil who their god has no control over. How omnipotent is that?
Why would you a sane person want to even belong to a religion that had Satan as one of their gods. I suppose when you inherit a belief system, you're stuck with it if you can't rationally understand it's absurdities. I do admit though, an out-of-your-control deity such as Satan would come in handy if you require a scapegoat for your less-than-honorable actions.
Be a man! Be good for goodness sake!
PussyCat_Eyes
1.6 / 5 (13) Jun 21, 2012These qualities are not always prevalent in either theists or atheists. More so in atheists who may shrug them off as being for those of weak character and intelligence.
Mike Mangan
2.5 / 5 (13) Jun 21, 2012roboferret
5 / 5 (5) Jun 21, 2012Swap "Atheist" for "Men with moustaches" and you can see how ridiculous that statement is. Correlation is not causation (BTW, Hitler was a self-professed Christian).
Yes, theocracies are great places to live, much better than moral-less atheistic hell-holes like Japan or Sweden.
Yes, you for a start. There is a constant stream of prosletysing babble from the religious, on T.V, on street corners, knocking on doors - threatening honest folks with eternal torture, and it's been that way for 2000 years. The boot rubs when it's on the other foot doesn't it?
TheGhostofOtto1923
2.8 / 5 (27) Jun 21, 2012Religionists have fared far worse as leaders, when they should have been expected to do much better. Because they claim to be superior moralists yes? The Japanese emperor was worshipped as a god. Marx, while decrying traditional religion, frequently appealed to the peoples preconceptions of 'soul' and 'spirit', and so was clearly using the tools of religionists to construct his own.
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, hitler and the rest were sold as superhuman saviors with their own mythologies and extraordinary abilities. And their own special right to write their own moral code as a result.
MandoZink
5 / 5 (2) Jun 21, 2012Those who point out past atrocities by so-called "atheists" are significantly mistaken as to the fundamental nature of the people who committed those acts. While religious violence is carried out by extremists in the name of their religious beliefs, the frequently mentioned historic atrocities by non-religious tyrants were committed by maladjusted individuals. They were either paranoid, narcissistic, megalomaniac, psychopathic, totalitarian or a combination thereof. They did not have any comprehension of the inherent moral sense of human kindness that the majority of rational atheists come to know.
The mental imbalance of these tyrants was irrespective of any religious belief.
panorama
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 21, 2012[sarcasm]
You're right, it makes much more sense to put stock in a book that is a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of an error ridden series of letters, second and probably third hand accounts of a supposedly magical guy that is also his own father.
[/sarcasm]
beyondApsis
4.4 / 5 (7) Jun 21, 2012Logic, my latest hobby, is proving to be a real minefield.
Mike Mangan
2.9 / 5 (8) Jun 21, 2012Mike Mangan
3.3 / 5 (7) Jun 21, 2012Am I right?
roboferret
4.3 / 5 (6) Jun 21, 2012I hope you can see your own hypocrisy here. Your claiming that an atheists beliefs (rather, lack of them) makes them do bad things, but when a person of religion does it, you say that their beliefs have nothing to do with it.
Atheism is the lack of a belief in god/s. That's it. there's no creed, no moral code, just non belief. I don't particularly care what religion you belong to because all supernatural claims tested by science have been found to be false. I reject religion for the same reasons I reject santa claus. By the way, so-called communist countries tend to be party/personality worship (Kim Jongs, Lenin, Mao etc). And please don't use ad-hominems.
Deesky
5 / 5 (3) Jun 21, 2012First, atheism is the opposite of religion.
Second, despot dictators shun organized religion because just like any mass movement, it could become a threat to their dictatorial rule. It's no different than banning protests or large public gatherings and imposing curfews.
Deathclock
1.7 / 5 (6) Jun 21, 2012PussyCat_Eyes
1.5 / 5 (15) Jun 22, 2012Why should it matter anyway? I don't ask the guy who works on my car engine if he's a believer or atheist and it wouldn't even occur to me to ask. But for some reason, on this website, it seems like a matter of life and death for atheists to explain their position on those who believe in God. And believers enter threads to extol the virtues of their religion as though they'll die if they don't push it. It's ridiculous to keep on this way. There are so many more important things to talk about than religion or non-religion.
Estevan57
1.8 / 5 (24) Jun 23, 2012DarwinSaves
3 / 5 (4) Jun 23, 2012Also, what religion has a Heaven, but not a Hell? And I can't imagine many non-religious people believing in either of these ideas.
And when you put into context that faith is lying to yourself for a divine figure, it makes one even more doubtful of the studies' claims. Additionally, it's sad that a study like this is being implemented when there are so many other factors to put into consideration for the claims of this study.
My gut tells me this study is an attempt by the religious to encourage others like themselves to maintain being a liar for a divine figure(s) until death, even at the cost of truth. Taking into context Intelligent Design and all the other ridiculous theological arguments for Christianity, my intuition does not seem so far-fetched.
Why is this garbage on this web site?
DarwinSaves
not rated yet Jun 23, 2012chardo137
1 / 5 (3) Jun 24, 2012bob456789
5 / 5 (3) Jun 25, 2012