US attorney general launches probes after newspaper leaks

June 9, 2012

US Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed prosecutors to lead two criminal investigations of high-profile leaks of classified national security information to the media.

The "highly-respected and experienced prosecutors will be directing separate investigations currently being conducted by the FBI," Holder said in a statement Friday.

"I have notified and plan to provide more information, as appropriate, to members of the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees," Holder said.

"The unauthorized disclosure of can compromise the security of this country and all Americans, and it will not be tolerated," he added.

The prosecutors were identified as US Attorneys Ronald Machen of the District of Columbia and Rod Rosenstein of Maryland. Holder expressed confidence in their ability to "doggedly follow the facts and the evidence in the pursuit of justice wherever it leads."

The announcement followed several explosive stories in US media: describing President Barack Obama's alleged push for on computers that run Iran's ; an apparent "kill list" of counterterrorism targets against whom Obama has authorized lethal action; and a secret drone campaign against terrorists in Yemen.

The New York Times reported that sources for their articles on the covert programs included former or current administration officials.

Some Republicans have suggested the information was leaked to boost Obama's image as a tough commander-in-chief in an election year.

Senator , who lost the 2008 presidential race to Obama, has been leading the accusations. He received backing Thursday from Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

"It has to be for reelection," King told Politico about the leaks. "They can deny it all they want. But it would require a suspension of belief to believe it's not being done for political purposes."

Obama hit back Friday, labeling the allegations "offensive."

"The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive," Obama said. "It's wrong. And, you know, people I think need to have a better sense of how I approach this office and how the people around me here approach this office."

"We're dealing with issues that can touch on the safety and security of the American people, our families, or our military personnel, or our allies. And so we don't play with that," Obama said.

"Whether or not the information they received is true, the writers of these articles have all stated unequivocally they didn't come from this White House, and that's not how we operate," the president said.

The chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator Dianne Feinstein, has called on Congress to swiftly enact legislation tightening rules to prevent unauthorized breaches, and welcomed an investigation launched by the FBI.

But she has held back on calling for a special prosecutor to look into the leaks, a move the White House has said Obama will not agree to.

Obama's Republican rival, Mitt Romney, believes the president should take greater charge in order to stop the leaks in their tracks.

"Leadership starts at the top. It's his sincere hope that the president is using all means at his disposal to put an end to this harmful practice," Romney campaign spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg told AFP on Thursday.

Explore further: White House checks in with foursquare

Related Stories

Obama joins Google+

November 23, 2011

Google+, the Internet search giant's rival to Facebook, has a high-profile new member: US President Barack Obama.

US senator slams White House over cyber leaks

June 2, 2012

US Senator John McCain on Saturday accused President Barack Obama's administration of leaking details of a reported cyber attack on Iran and other secret operations to bolster the president's image in an election year.

Furious US lawmakers say security leaks must end (Update)

June 7, 2012

The top US lawmakers overseeing intelligence stood united Thursday in demanding an end to a "cascade" of national security leaks, as they scrambled to draw up legislation to rein in breaches that they say jeopardize lives.

Recommended for you

Smart home heating and cooling

August 28, 2015

Smart temperature-control devices—such as thermostats that learn and adjust to pre-programmed temperatures—are poised to increase comfort and save energy in homes.

Smallest 3-D camera offers brain surgery innovation

August 28, 2015

To operate on the brain, doctors need to see fine details on a small scale. A tiny camera that could produce 3-D images from inside the brain would help surgeons see more intricacies of the tissue they are handling and lead ...

Team creates functional ultrathin solar cells

August 27, 2015

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria has developed an ultrathin solar cell for use in lightweight and flexible applications. In their paper published in the journal Nature Materials, ...

Interactive tool lifts veil on the cost of nuclear energy

August 24, 2015

Despite the ever-changing landscape of energy economics, subject to the influence of new technologies and geopolitics, a new tool promises to root discussions about the cost of nuclear energy in hard evidence rather than ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Feldagast
5 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2012
If it was the white house do you really think Eric Holder will report it?
Caliban
5 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2012
If prosecution is good enough for a whistleblower like Bradley Manning, then it is overwhelmingly justified for the deliberate, politically-motivated "leak" of state secrets, and in this case, particularly, which is a far more serious breach of the SSA than Manning's actions.

It still remains to be determined which individual(s) are the leakers --and just exactly who they work for. Anyone who wanted to create trouble could leak this information, as it wasn't particularly well classified, while demonstrating plausibly genuine credentials to the press.

If it was in fact a White House staffer, then the investigation will go nowhere, officially, and the culprit quietly sacked or reassigned elsewhere --unless it can be proven that they were coerced, bribed or subverted-- in which case the offender will be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail.

Remember Scooter Libby?

If it is(as is far more likely) a political opponent or mole, then again we can expect full prosecution.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.