American drivers turn to smaller, better engines

Jun 14, 2012 by TOM KRISHER
This Oct. 9, 2002 file photo shows the hood ornament of a 1967 Pontiac GTO in Sturtevant, Wis. Back when gas was cheap, Americans bought cars with V-8 engines like the Big Block, Cobra Jet and Ramcharger, but now, thanks to government regulation and gas-price gyrations, the motors that move the nation’s cars and trucks are shrinking. (AP Photo/Journal Times, Mark Hertzberg, file)

(AP) — Back when gas was cheap, Americans bought cars with V-8 engines like the Big Block, Cobra Jet and Ramcharger. Acceleration was all that mattered, even in family cars that never made it to full throttle.

The 427-cubic inch (6,997-cubic centimeter) Chevrolet Tri-Power was the siren song of the gearhead, sending Corvettes roaring down the highway at up to 140 mph (225 kph).

But now, thanks to government regulation and gas-price gyrations, the motors that move the nation's cars and trucks are shrinking.

Whether they drive hulking pickups or family sedans, Americans are increasingly choosing smaller engines that use less fuel, especially four-cylinder models that offer more horsepower than was possible just a few years ago.

More than half the new cars and trucks sold in the U.S. through May had four-cylinder motors. That's up from 36 percent in 2007, and it's the highest sales percentage since 1998, when the J.D. Power and Associates consulting firm started keeping track.

The smaller engines are helping to change America's gas-guzzling ways. The government now requires automakers to build more fuel-efficient cars and trucks. Drivers are eager to save money on gas, which recently flirted with $4 a gallon and is still pricey at an average of $3.53. Also, people have embraced cars with downsized engines because new technology has made them just as fast as older cars with bigger motors.

"You can take away my V-8, but don't take my acceleration," said IHS Automotive analyst Rebecca Lindland. "We're willing to embrace a technology that doesn't make us compromise performance."

In general, shoppers can pick from three types of engines: four-, six- and eight-cylinders. More cylinders usually produce more horsepower but also burn more fuel.

Until recently, each engine type had dedicated fans. Pickup drivers, who tend to haul heavy loads, favored brawny V-8s. Sedan drivers generally opted for six cylinders if they wanted snappy acceleration or four cylinders if they preferred fuel savings.

Decades ago, when gas was cheap, buyers usually went for bigger engines to get more power. Back then, noisy "fours" clattered down the highway inside compacts or wimpy midsize cars. Some drivers complained that four-cylinder cars didn't have enough power to merge safely onto busy highways.

That began to change in the 1990s, when Honda and Toyota refined their fours, making them quieter and more powerful. In 2005, gas prices spiked after Hurricane Katrina knocked out refineries. The steeper prices made fuel-efficient cars more popular and forced Detroit's truck-obsessed automakers to spend more money improving their smaller engines.

Small engines got another boost in 2007, when the government began raising gas mileage minimums, eventually requiring new cars and trucks sold in the U.S. to average 54.6 mpg (23.2 kpl) by 2025. The shift toward smaller engines gathered more momentum in 2008, when gas spiked again — above $4 a gallon.

Because of technology advances, many four-cylinder engines are more powerful than V-6s from only a few years ago. For example, today's Hyundai Sonata midsize car has a 2.4-liter four with 198 horsepower, 45 more horses than the base V-6 in a 2006 Ford Taurus.

This Sept. 16, 2008 file photo shows the engine compartment of Scott Pierce's 1969 Oldsmobile F-85 with the W-31 engine performance package, in MEriden, Conn.Back when gas was cheap, Americans bought cars with V-8 engines like the Big Block, Cobra Jet and Ramcharger, but now, thanks to government regulation and gas-price gyrations, the motors that move the nation’s cars and trucks are shrinking. (AP Photo/The Record-Journal, Johnathon Henniger)**MANDATORY CREDIT, MAGS OUT, NO SALES**

Mileage was important for Meagan Sherwood of Milan, Mich., when she bought a new four-cylinder Hyundai Veloster. The property manager traded a V-6-powered Jeep Wrangler for the funky hatchback, which gets up to 32 mpg (13.6 kpl) in city and highway driving. The Jeep, she says, got around 13.

"I was filling up twice a week on a 15-gallon tank with the Jeep," Sherwood said. "Now I fill up once a week with a 10-gallon tank."

Sherwood said she would only go back to a larger engine if she and her husband start a family and need more space.

To boost the efficiency and power of small engines, companies have introduced all kinds of technology:

— Direct fuel injection is more common. It mixes air and gas in the chamber that surrounds the piston, helping produce more power, more efficiently.

— Many small engines now have turbochargers, which force high concentrations of air into the piston chamber, allowing more gas to be sent in and offering extra acceleration or hauling capacity whenever drivers step on the pedal.

— Engineers have made cars more aerodynamic. Also, some vehicles shut off their engines automatically at stoplights. They can run pumps and other devices off the battery rather than a belt that sucks power from the engine.

Even as they become more powerful, smaller engines are helping lower gas consumption. So far this year, consumption is down 5 percent from the same period a year ago, according to government data.

Part of the drop is because people drive fewer miles in a weak economy. But engines play a key role. The average new car goes about four miles farther on a gallon than in October 2007, said Michael Sivak, a research professor at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

In March, the average mileage of new cars hit a record 24.1 mpg (10.2 kpl), dropping slightly since then.

In this Tuesday, May 8, 2012, photo, James Tharp sales manger at Fiat of South Atlanta in Morrow, Ga., poses with new Fiats Tuesday May 8, 2012. Back when gas was cheap, Americans bought cars with V-8 engines like the Big Block, Cobra Jet and Ramcharger, but now, thanks to government regulation and gas-price gyrations, the motors that move the nation’s cars and trucks are shrinking. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

The improvements become more striking when drivers compare engines. Four-cylinder engines averaged 26.4 mpg this model year, compared with an average of 16.1 mpg (6.8 kpl) for eight-cylinders, Sivak said. If gas were at $4, the average driver would save roughly $1,300 a year by switching to a car with the smaller engine.

Hyundai was so confident in its four that it stopped offering a V-6 in the 2011 Sonata. Chevrolet and Ford are doing the same on the new Malibu and Fusion, which go on sale later this year.

In fact, eight out of 10 midsize cars sold this year had four-cylinder engines, according to the Edmunds.com automotive website. Just a decade ago, the majority of midsize cars — normally the biggest segment of the market — had V-6 engines.

In the heyday of the muscle car, automakers tried to stuff the biggest engine they could into smaller cars. Now it's the opposite. Companies are putting smaller engines in larger vehicles, even in Ford's F-Series pickup truck, the nation's top-selling vehicle.

In 2011, Ford began offering V-6s, including a turbocharged engine, in the F-150 after years of selling only V-8s. Now nearly 60 percent of F-150s are sold with V-6s, and Ford expects that to increase. The V-6 turbo gets 18 mpg in combined city-highway driving. The V-8 gets 14.

It didn't take long for Colorado real estate agent Dan Murphy to switch to a smaller truck .

A year ago, he bought a Ram pickup with a V-8, only to find that the mileage was awful when towing his 19-foot (5.8-meter) boat through the mountains. The Ram, he said, got only 4 mpg (1.7 kpl) at one point, costing him a fortune.

So he traded it for an F-150 with a turbo V-6. On a recent trip pulling the boat to Utah, his Ford got over 17 mpg (7.2 kpl).

"Once you drive this, there's no way you're going back to a V-8," he said.

At Fiat of South Atlanta, the trend toward smaller engines is driving up sales of the 500 mini-car, which until February had been selling slowly.

"We've had several people trade in Ford Tauruses, not a bad mileage car," said sales manager James Tharp. "People will say in a heartbeat, 'These gas prices are killing us.'"

Explore further: User awareness key to effective energy monitoring

4 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Consumer Reports: Best, worst new cars for fuel economy

Jun 14, 2011

Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assigns a fuel economy rating to all new vehicles, Consumer Reports magazine conducts its own independent testing. The magazine recently concluded testing on 2011 models ...

Diesel fights for traction with U.S. buyers

Apr 17, 2009

Just like gasoline, diesel fuel has plummeted in price since last summer after reaching almost $5 a gallon. So now that diesel goes for about $2.25, sales of diesel-powered vehicles, which almost always get better mileage ...

The case of the missing gas mileage

Jan 04, 2012

Contrary to common perception, the major automakers have produced large increases in fuel efficiency through better technology in recent decades. There’s just one catch: All those advances have barely ...

Five myths about diesel engines

Jun 14, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Diesel engines, long confined to trucks and ships, are garnering more interest for their fuel efficiency and reduced carbon dioxide emissions, relative to gasoline engines. Argonne mechanical ...

Recommended for you

Radiation leak at Japan lab; small impact expected

14 hours ago

An atomic research lab in northern Japan has reported a radiation leak that may have affected about 50 people, though none were hospitalized and no impact was expected outside the facility, the lab's operator ...

The long road to the 2000-watt society

May 24, 2013

The vision of a society in which each inhabitant of the earth manages to consume only 2000 watts (48 kilowatt-hours per day) has already been around for 15 years. During this time, there has been a steady incr ...

Germany must spread cost of energy shift fairly: IEA

May 24, 2013

The International Energy Agency said Friday that Germany must shield its consumers from paying too much of the cost of its ambitious switch from nuclear power and fossil fuels toward renewable energy.

Solar Kettle allows for boiling water off the grid

May 23, 2013

(Phys.org) —A company called Contemporary Energy has unveiled a new device it calls the Solar Kettle. It looks very much like a normal coffee thermos, but has flaps on one side that open to allow for collecting ...

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
5 / 5 (5) Jun 14, 2012
These gas prices are killing us.


By design.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (6) Jun 14, 2012
You have been continually warned for the last 40 years, and you have done nothing.

"These gas prices are killing us." - Article

Now suffer and die.
Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Jun 14, 2012
There are many sloppy "facts" in the article.

First is the acceleration-horsepower comparison, which isn't quite so. Big engines with more cylinders generate more power at low speeds. Naturally aspirated 4-cylinder engines make power only at the very top of the RPM range, which is what made them noisy and wimpy in the past.

Turbocharging hasn't been very popular in the US because the cylinder pressure puts demands on the fuel. When you compare US regular vs. EU regular on the same scale, US is 91 RON and EU is 95 RON, so cars in Europe run on what in the US is considered premium grade, which is more expensive, and most people won't buy cars that need expensive fuel. Obviously, you can't increase the boost pressure or the compression ratio as much with worse fuel, so the engines will be worse.

And finally, kilometers per liter (kpl) doesn't make sense and isn't used. You don't consume distance, you consume fuel, liters per kilometer, or more commonly, liters per 100 km.
Burnerjack
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 14, 2012
Now American cars get milage similar to European cars. That's great. Now if they could do something with the handling, along with the fit and finish...
Eikka
not rated yet Jun 14, 2012
Or if you want to be pedantic with the SI, you should be counting fuel consumption in square meters. Why? because the base units would be qubic meters divided by meters. You can think of it as the size of the hole at the bottom of the fuel tank.

But anyways, if writing L/100km is too difficult, then you can write cl/km or µl/m. They all have the same magnitude.
Burnerjack
5 / 5 (3) Jun 14, 2012
Eikka, all you say is absolutely true. Big displacement yields big torque. Turbos yield reduced low end torque, often with a "spool up" delay as well as putting demands on octane. What to do, what to do? Eureka!! Electric drive (max torque at ZERO RPM, coupled to an EXternal combustion engine, NO octane requirements at all! Not even a specific fuel type required! This will not come without the appropriate R&D, investment, etc. But it's all possible and all the components already exist.
Eikka
1 / 5 (1) Jun 14, 2012
Turbos yield reduced low end torque


Turbos actually give more low end torque and spread the torque curve over a wider range of speeds because they cram more air into the engine at low RPM when the engine itself isn't pumping much.

But they do have spool up delays unless the turbo is small. A very small turbo then has the opposite problem, which makes it behave a bit like a diesel engine - good acceleration, good torque, but at some point the going just stops and you ain't going any faster.
Shifty0x88
not rated yet Jun 14, 2012
Hey @burnerjack, they are called hybrids, look them up they are pretty cool.

More seriously, don't forget about the engines that shut down cylinders when you get on the highway for even more added fuel savings.

And some cars do come with turbos now, they are getting more widespread. I wouldn't say they are on the top of the list, but they are getting closer and closer as people want the quick acceleration, while saving fuel.
Feldagast
not rated yet Jun 14, 2012
ScottyB
1 / 5 (1) Jun 15, 2012
About time you yanks woke up to his, engine size isnt all that matters.

I have a 1.4 super charged / turbo charged petrol engine that has 170BHP, will do 130 MPH and does 0-60 in less than 7 seconds!

Probably quicker than most of the old V8 Beasts that are on the american roads.

Oh yeah, and it will do over 40 MPG!
SatanLover
2 / 5 (4) Jun 15, 2012
According to the graphs EU has successfully lowered their emissions and the US has successfully raised their emissions despite off shoring jobs and factories.
wiyosaya
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 15, 2012
I am a US citizen, and while I find some of the comments here patronizing, I am appalled at how US citizens, and perhaps non US citizens, too, continue to chase horsepower and acceleration that most do not need and most do not use.

However, I do not blame the consumers, I blame automobile manufacturers who are only interested in making absurd profits, and making portions of the population think that driving a fast car or a gas-guzzling SUV makes you a complete person. Utter crap as I see it.

Now before citizens from the rest of the world gloat on this, manufacturers like BMW, Mercedes, Bentley, and (your favorite non US manufacturer here) also market vehicles with over-sized, gas guzzling engines that have more power than most drivers will ever need. US manufacturers are just as guilty, too.

IMHO, no one needs such horsepower, and people who seek that kind of horsepower, as evidenced by the cars they drive, seem the most dangerous to me. To hell with performance. Give us efficiency!
Moebius
1 / 5 (2) Jun 17, 2012
Had a beast like the one in the picture, actually a 66 which doesn't have the silver grill screens. It got about 7 mpg on the highway and would do about 120. I have a Corvette now that will do 190 and it gets 28 mpg. Things have gotten much better.
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2012
continue to chase horsepower and acceleration that most do not need and most do not use.

Amen.

Pretty pointless to buy a car for its speed (especially in the US where you can't use it anywhere). There are few cars that don't perform adequately for 99% use they are put to (shooping, commuting, getting from A to B at the speed limit). If you really think about buying a performance beast then you're probably in the income bracket that doesn't care about gas prices, anyhow.

However, I do not blame the consumers,

I blame the consumers. If you buy something you CHOOSE to buy that something. If the information that goes with it is right there on the box you have no right to complain that the car isn't as efficient (or the food as nutritious) as you thought it SHOULD be.

More news stories

Yahoo, pay-TV operators among Hulu bidders

Online video site Hulu is again up for sale, with Yahoo and pay TV operators DirecTV and Time Warner Cable among the seven bidders, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

Radiation leak at Japan lab; small impact expected

An atomic research lab in northern Japan has reported a radiation leak that may have affected about 50 people, though none were hospitalized and no impact was expected outside the facility, the lab's operator ...