Twitter challenges US subpoena seeking user data

May 08, 2012
The Twitter homepage. Twitter is challenging a court order to turn over to law enforcement data on one of its users involved in Occupy Wall Street in a case described by a civil liberties group as a major test of online freedom of speech.

Twitter is challenging a court order to turn over to law enforcement data on one of its users involved in Occupy Wall Street in a case described by a civil liberties group as a major test of online freedom of speech.

The motion filed Monday in a New York state court said the order would require to violate federal law and denies the user the ownership rights to his Twitter messages.

The case involves a Twitter user, Malcolm Harris, who is being prosecuted for disorderly conduct in connection with the Occupy Wall Street protest on the Brooklyn Bridge last year.

The on Tuesday applauded Twitter's action, saying the company was standing up for free speech.

"This is a big deal," said ACLU attorney Aden Fine.

", both the federal government and state and city entities, are becoming increasingly aggressive in their attempts to obtain information about what people are doing on the Internet.

"And while the individual Internet users can try to defend their rights in the rare circumstances in which they find out about the requests before their information is turned over, that may not be enough."

Last month, a judge denied a motion by Harris to quash the subpoena, saying he lacked legal standing. The judge said the data stored on the Internet is not physical property and therefore does not have the same protection,

"As a user, we may think that (Internet) storage space to be like a 'virtual home,' and with that strong privacy protection similar to our physical homes," Judge Matthew Sciarrino said in his April 20 ruling.

"However, that 'home' is a block of ones and zeroes stored somewhere on someone's computer. As a consequence, some of our most private information is sent to third parties and held far away on remote network servers."

The judge also said that while a Twitter user's information and contain a considerable amount of information about the user, "Twitter does not guarantee any of its users complete privacy."

Twitter responded with the motion saying its users have rights to their own tweets and other information.

"As we said in our brief, Twitter's terms of service make absolutely clear that its users 'own' their content," Twitter counsel Ben Lee said in a statement to AFP.

"Our filing with the court reaffirms our steadfast commitment to defending those rights for our users."

According to the brief, the federal Stored Communications Act and Twitter's own policies mean the users have rights to their own postings.

"To hold otherwise imposes a new and overwhelming burden on Twitter to fight for its users' rights, since the (court order) deprives its of the ability to fight for their own rights when faced with a subpoena from New York State," the Twitter brief said.

Explore further: Twitpic to stay alive with new owner

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Court to hear challenge in Twitter-WikiLeaks case

Feb 15, 2011

A federal judge will hear arguments Tuesday on a court order directing Twitter to hand over information on the accounts of people connected to WikiLeaks in a case pitting privacy advocates against federal ...

Twitter expands ad program to mobile users

Feb 29, 2012

Twitter said Tuesday it was expanding its advertising program to mobile users, the latest bid by the short-messaging service to boost its money-making efforts.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

Sep 17, 2014

Online ratings operator Yelp agreed to pay $450,000 to settle US charges that it illegally collected data on children, in violation of privacy laws, officials said Wednesday.

User comments : 0