Shareholders paying the price for pension deficits

May 02, 2012

Companies are prioritising their pension fund deficits and shareholders are paying the price, shows new research from our University.

Professor Ian Tonks, from the University of Bath’s School of Management, has been examining the effect of a company’s mandatory pension contributions on its dividend payments and investment spending.

Professor Tonks, who conducted his research with Dr Weixi Liu from the University of Exeter, studied a sample of 180 FTSE350 UK listed firms from 2000 to 2007.

More than 90% of companies in this sample had a pension deficit over this period, meaning their pension schemes were underfunded, and the value of their pension liabilities were greater than the value of assets held to pay these pensions. The typical extent of this underfunding was a ratio of pension deficits to pension assets of 8.6%.The research investigated the impact of companies being required to fully fund their pension scheme liabilities on their dividend policies and investments.

The study made use of information on corporate pension deficits which became available after accounting changes to FRS17 in 2001 and legislative changes due to the Pensions Acts 1995 and 2004.

Professor Tonks said: “Results show that the channel through which companies with large pension deficits make up their funding shortfalls is by paying lower dividends to shareholders, rather than cutting back on investments.

“The implication is that shareholders in a company with a pension deficit should anticipate that future dividends are likely to be reduced.”

The research has implications for future stock prices of companies with Defined Benefit pension schemes deficits. The latest Purple Book – published by the UK’s Pension Protection Fund and Pension Regulator documents the risks faced by occupational defined pension schemes. This latest report found that there were 5,450 pension schemes in deficit in 2011 and their overall deficit, based on a full buy-out basis, was £470.7 billion.

On 27 April 2012 The Pensions Regulator announced that it recognised that the current economic conditions impacts on companies funding their pension schemes but warned “If there is substantial risk to the likelihood of the pension scheme delivering the benefit entitlements promised within it, then dividend payments need to be re-assessed in light of the obligations to the pension scheme, and other creditors” (TPR, 2012; para. 26).

Professor Tonks’ study established that the effect of pension contributions on investments in the UK is weaker than the evidence for US companies. This suggests that pension regulations in the UK allow firms sufficient discretion to maintain investment spending, and that in the UK the response of balance sheet adjustments to financial pressures takes place through dividends rather than real investments.

Professor Tonks added: “We found that the dividend and investment sensitivities to contributions are more pronounced in and after 2005, indicating that the regulations in the Pensions Act 2004 have had a significant effect on corporate expenditures.”

Explore further: Samsung removes logo on smartphones in Japan

More information: people.bath.ac.uk/it237/Research/Dividend&Investment_Sensitivity.pdf

Related Stories

Bigger is better in pension funds, researchers find

Sep 12, 2011

The health of the pension system is front page news in countries around the world with an ongoing debate on required contribution rates or minimum retirement ages. An equally relevant issue is how efficiently savings invested ...

'Credit Crunch' Will Hit Retirees in Unequal Ways

Oct 09, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- How severely retirees will be affected by the continuing financial crisis and subsequent "credit crunch" depends to a considerable extent on the kinds of retirement plans they rely on for retirement income, ...

Recommended for you

Taiwan factory workers win $18 mn over cancer deaths

Apr 17, 2015

Workers from a factory in Taiwan which leeched toxic chemicals they say resulted in 200 deaths from cancer and more than 1,000 other cases of the disease won a Tw$564.45 million ($18 million) payout from US electronics company ...

Court monitor: Apple antitrust cooperation has 'declined'

Apr 17, 2015

Apple Inc.'s cooperation with efforts to improve its compliance with antitrust laws after a federal judge concluded it colluded with electronic book publishers to raise prices five years ago took on an "adversarial tone" ...

SEC questions LA Unified on use of bonds for iPad project

Apr 17, 2015

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently questioned Los Angeles Unified School District officials as part of informal inquiry into whether they properly used bond funds for a beleaguered $1.3 billion project to provide ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (1) May 02, 2012
Without adequate Regulation, Corporations will steal everything they can get their hands on.
mrCalvin
not rated yet May 02, 2012
What can I say . . .GOOD

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.