Are educators showing a 'positive bias' to minority students?

May 04, 2012

Remember that teacher you grumbled about back in your school days, the really tough one who made you work so hard, insisted you could do better, and made you sweat for your A's? The one you didn't appreciate until after you graduated and realized how much you had learned?

Minority students in the U.S. might have fewer of those teachers, at least compared to white students, and as a result they might be at a significant learning disadvantage.

A major study, led by Rutgers-Newark psychology professor Kent D. Harber, indicates that public school teachers under-challenge minority students by providing them more positive feedback than they give to white students, for work of equal merit. The study, which is currently available online in the Journal of Educational Psychology (JEP), involved 113 white middle school and high school teachers in two public school districts located in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut tri-state area, one and white, and the other more working class and racially mixed.

Teachers read and commented on a poorly written essay which they believed was composed by a student in a writing class. Some teachers thought the student was black, some thought the student was Latino, and some thought that the student was white. Teachers believed that their feedback would be sent directly to the student, in order to see how the student would benefit from their comments and advice.

In fact, there was no actual student, and the poorly written essay was developed by Harber and his team. The real purpose was to see how teachers would respond to subpar work due to the race of the student who composed it. As Harber and his team predicted, the teachers displayed a "positive feedback bias," providing more praise and less criticism if they thought the essay was written by a minority student than by a white student.

An important aspect of the positive bias was that it depended on how much social support teachers received from their fellow teachers and administrators—but only if the student was black. In This case, teachers lacking social support showed the positive bias, while those who enjoyed support did not show the bias. Teachers who thought the student was Latino showed the bias, regardless of their school-based social support.

"The social implications of these results are important; many minority students might not be getting input from instructors that stimulates intellectual growth and fosters achievement," notes Harber. "Some education scholars believe that minorities under-perform because they are insufficiently challenged—the 'bigotry of lowered expectations,' in popular parlance," he explains. "The JEP study indicates one important way that this insufficient challenge might occur: in positively biased feedback," according to Harber.

Harber believes that the positive feedback bias might help explain the stubborn academic performance gap between minority students and white students, an enduring social problem that threatens to "reverse social successes won through legislation, jurisprudence, and changing cultural attitudes" toward minorities. Previous attempts to address the performance gap have, correctly, examined inequalities in school funding, racism, and distrust of academia in some minority communities, notes the report.

The current study suggests that the performance gap might also be due to a cause that has received relatively little attention: the nature of instructional feedback from white teachers to .

Harber believes the study's findings have implications not only for educational systems in the U.S. but also for businesses and in fact any organization where performance appraisals and feedback are crucial tools for training and development.

The study builds on and expands Harber's previous demonstrations of the positive feedback bias, involving college students in 1998 and in 2004, and teacher trainees in 2010. His partners on this latest study are: Jamie L. Gorman and Frank P. Gengaro, Rutgers University, Newark; Samantha Butisingh and William Tsang, Rutgers University, New Brunswick; and Rebecca Ouellette, Fairleigh Dickinson University.

Harber and his team believe their findings could have broad implications for , parents and students, and business leaders. He is available to explain in detail how the research was conducted, who was involved, the analysis and outcomes.

Explore further: Developing nations ride a motorcycle boom

More information: Journal of Educational Psychology, Apr 30 , 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0028110

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Math teachers demonstrate a bias toward white male students

Apr 16, 2012

While theories about race, gender, and math ability among high school students have long been debated, a recent study found that math teachers are in fact, unjustifiably biased toward their white male students. This study ...

Study: Teachers choose schools according to student race

May 27, 2009

A study forthcoming in the Journal of Labor Economics suggests that high-quality teachers tend to leave schools that experience inflows of black students. According to the study's author, C. Kirabo Jackson (Cornell Univer ...

Recommended for you

Male-biased tweeting

18 hours ago

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Developing nations ride a motorcycle boom

20 hours ago

Asia's rapidly developing economies should prepare for a full-throttle increase in motorcycle numbers as average incomes increase, a new study from The Australian National University has found.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Corban
5 / 5 (1) May 04, 2012
As a rule of thumb, any situation where no choice has a positive result should be highly discouraged.

If educators are harsh, they are lambasted.
If they are soft, they are uncharitably making students soft.

I'm sure that perfection is achieved in the middle, but the middle is never known a priori (and perceiving problems a priori is the whole name of the game, otherwise you're just setting folks up for failure).

In finance, the only people who benefit from volatility are the day traders.

In sociology, the only people who benefit from unwinnable scenarios are the agents and proselytizers.
nymuseum
3 / 5 (4) May 04, 2012
If I, a European white, were honestly teaching in a USA classroom with non-white students I could not but think of the potential of dealing with lawyers if some student or parent decided to sue for a non-real perceived racial slight. No mechanism exists to protect a teacher in such a situation. One would be branded forever.
Russkiycremepuff
1.4 / 5 (10) May 05, 2012
nymuseum has got it right. In addition to that, the social climate in America is such that good teachers have to be concerned for their personal safety and well-being due to retaliation of minority parents and their children for imagined racial slights.

""The social implications of these results are important; many minority students might not be getting input from instructors that stimulates intellectual growth and fosters achievement," notes Harber. "Some education scholars believe that minorities under-perform because they are insufficiently challengedthe 'bigotry of lowered expectations,' in popular parlance," he explains."

Yes, it IS the bigotry of lowered expectations that is at the root of matter. We do not have such bigotry in my country because all children are expected to excel without exception, and those who are unable to excel enough to reach for higher education, are offered the most appropriate form of work for their mental, psychological and physical level.
Ferky
1 / 5 (8) May 05, 2012
Kudos for the "researchers" for coming up with yet another results-guaranteed "study". If the teachers are harsher on the minority kids, then the teachers are racists. If the teachers are harsher on the white kids, then the teachers are failing the minority kids by failing to give them "tough love". Either way, the teachers are bad and the minority kids are victims.

I remember a time, long ago, when social and behavioral scientists were doing things other than coming up with excuses for the failures of minorities. Now, all it takes to get tenure is to write that minorities are victims.
verkle
1 / 5 (8) May 07, 2012
The logic makes sense, but such results are not PC. Is it really OK to publish them? :)

More news stories

Male-biased tweeting

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Not just the poor live hand-to-mouth

When the economy hits the skids, government stimulus checks to the poor sometimes follow. Stimulus programs—such as those in 2001, 2008 and 2009—are designed to boost the economy quickly by getting cash ...

Archaeologists, tribe clash over Native remains

Archaeologists and Native Americans are clashing over Indian remains and artifacts that were excavated during a construction project in the San Francisco Bay Area, but then reburied at an undisclosed location.

When things get glassy, molecules go fractal

Colorful church windows, beads on a necklace and many of our favorite plastics share something in common—they all belong to a state of matter known as glasses. School children learn the difference between ...

FCC to propose pay-for-priority Internet standards

The Federal Communications Commission is set to propose new open Internet rules that would allow content companies to pay for faster delivery over the so-called "last mile" connection to people's homes.