Separating signal from noise in living cells

May 07, 2012
Separating signal from noise in living cells
Dr Clive Bowsher

A mathematician from the University of Bristol has teamed up with a biologist from the University of Edinburgh to address a major problem in molecular biology.

Dr Clive Bowsher, Lecturer at the School of Mathematics, and Professor Peter Swain at Synthetic and Edinburgh co-authored a paper in the showing how to separate ‘signal’ from ‘noise’ when studying the mechanisms of living

Cells make decisions in fluctuating environments using inherently noisy biochemical mechanisms. Such effects create considerable, unpredictable variation – known as ‘stochasticity’– both over time and between genetically identical cells. To understand how cells exploit and control these biochemical fluctuations, scientists must identify the sources of stochasticity, quantify their effects, and distinguish variation that carries information about the biological environment from confounding noise.

In their PNAS paper, Dr Bowsher and Professor Swain show how to decompose the fluctuations of biochemical networks into multiple components and how to design experimental ‘reporters’ to measure these components in living cells.

"The mathematics provides variance decomposition techniques for dynamic systems," said Dr Bowsher. "We were able to make rigorous connections between the concept of intrinsic noise in systems biology, the notion of information capacity used in communications engineering, and a correlation ratio introduced in the 1950s by Alfréd Rényi. We constructed a generalised signal-to-noise measure from the variance components to quantify the efficacy of information flow through a biochemical network."

The paper, which describes the application of this approach to yeast cells, shows that the majority of cellular variation may be informational in origin and due to fluctuations in the cellular environment. The results pave the way to a better understanding of the dynamics of signal processing and decision-making by cells.

"As we understand better how cells respond to their environments, we will be better placed to control their behaviour in situ," said Dr Bowsher, "for example enabling the delivery by synthetic cells of drugs to the right place in the body at the right time."

Explore further: Bacterial communication considered for medical applications

More information: www.pnas.org/content/early/201… /1119407109.abstract

Related Stories

Hearing theory music to MP3 generation ears

Dec 01, 2011

The revival of a 150-year-old theory on how the human ear protects itself from damage caused by loud sounds could lead to better noise protection says a researcher from The Australian National University.

Scientists expose important new weak spot in cancer cells

Dec 05, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- Cancer Research UK scientists have discovered that cancer cells can ‘bag up and bin’ a toxic protein to cheat death – revealing a new Achilles heel in cancer cells that could be targeted ...

DNA cages 'can survive inside living cells'

Jul 04, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists at Oxford University have shown for the first time that molecular cages made from DNA can enter and survive inside living cells.

Recommended for you

Hydrogen powers important nitrogen-transforming bacteria

13 hours ago

Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria are key players in the natural nitrogen cycle on Earth and in biological wastewater treatment plants. For decades, these specialist bacteria were thought to depend on nitrite as ...

New tool aids stem cell engineering for medical research

Aug 28, 2014

A Mayo Clinic researcher and his collaborators have developed an online analytic tool that will speed up and enhance the process of re-engineering cells for biomedical investigation. CellNet is a free-use Internet platform ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

FieryJack
not rated yet May 08, 2012
Nice to see this discussion from another aspect. Hancock, Kholodenko and Kolch came to much the same conclusions and correlated their math with signaling pathways in mammalian cells. What we need now is to intergrate these molecular biological responses into tissue or organismal level algorithms to aid predicitive pharmacology.