NASA says competition is key to private space race

May 17, 2012 by Kerry Sheridan
Competition is vital to the race among private companies to replace the space shuttle, NASA deputy administrator Lori Garver, pictured in 2009, said Thursday, after Congress called for the US space agency to fund a single company.

Competition is vital to the race among private companies to replace the space shuttle, NASA said Thursday, after Congress called for the US space agency to fund a single company.

"We believe that competition is key to accelerating this program," said NASA deputy administrator Lori Garver in a conference call with reporters.

"We are ushering in a new era that embraces the innovation of the private sector along with the importance of what we do here in the government."

The renewed debate over how to quickly restore US access to the following the shuttle's retirement comes as California-based is preparing for its first cargo to the orbiting lab on Saturday.

But with plans for a crew-capable spacecraft not expected before the 2015-2017 timeframe, and NASA pouring hundreds of millions of dollars in seed money into four private companies, some lawmakers have urged a narrower process.

The House of Representatives last week passed a bill that calls on NASA to make an immediate choice of one company for the commercial crew funding it plans to distribute later this year, expected to be around $500 million.

Last year, NASA's Commercial Crew Development program gave nearly $270 million to four companies: Blue Origin ($22 million), Boeing ($92.3 million), SpaceX ($75 million), and Sierra Nevada ($80 million).

Congressman Frank Wolf, a Republican from Virginia and chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees NASA's budget, said last week the current approach "runs a high risk of failure" by funding numerous companies.

The scheme makes it likely to leave the "taxpayer with no tangible benefits in exchange for a substantial investment," he added.

Former NASA astronaut and president of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation Michael Lopez-Alegria, pictured here in 2007, said that reducing competition now would raise prices, not lower them.

The Senate would have to approve the bill for it to take effect, but NASA bristled at the suggestion that less competition would be more cost-effective.

"Obviously, while we believe in competition, we recognize that we are to the point now where we want to have the most realistic and the best chance of success at meeting our goals to be transporting astronauts to the International Space Station as soon as possible," Garver said.

When awards are decided on this year, NASA hoped the selection would allow that "to happen in the very soonest timeframe while keeping some competition," she added.

SpaceX is clearly in the lead among its competitors. Its upcoming cargo test flight uses the Dragon space capsule that is also built to carry up to seven crew.

is also poised to start localized tests of its Dream Chaser vehicle this month. And Orbital Sciences Corporation, which has a separate contract with NASA for cargo missions to the ISS, is expected to do a test launch later this year.

"The first to market doesn't always win either so there are a lot of interesting times ahead," said Jeff Greason, president of XCOR Aerospace and an executive committee member of the Commercial SpaceFlight Federation.

Greason lamented the high cost of paying Russia $63 million dollars a seat so US astronauts can hitch a ride to the ISS, a cost that the United States began paying once the 30-year program ended in 2011.

"Relying on the Soyuz or any sole system as the only means of transport to the ISS isn't wise. The Soyuz has been a great spacecraft but the Russians are not immune to hardware problems," he said.

Former astronaut and president of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation Michael Lopez-Alegria said that reducing competition now would raise prices, not lower them.

"Once you get out of the competition phase, you start getting into monopoly pricing and not only is it going to cost more but it is going to take longer," he told reporters.

"So we need to resist the temptation of saying, 'If we want to have it sooner we should just throw money at less companies because they'll have more money to go faster.' That is not the path to success."

In the meantime, Lopez-Alegria said he and many others will be closely watching SpaceX's cargo attempt, scheduled to lift off Saturday at 4:55 am (0855 GMT).

"It is by all accounts an important step, bordering on a giant leap for commercial spaceflight," he said.

"Although SpaceX's efforts are in today's spotlight, they are but one player on a team that is fully engaged in reducing the cost of access to space for people and payloads."

Explore further: End dawns for Europe's space cargo delivery role

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Private space race heats up as shuttle retires

Jul 13, 2011

Private companies, aided by NASA's cash and expertise in human space flight, are rushing to be the first to build a space capsule to replace the retiring US shuttle in the next few years.

NASA awards $270 million in spaceship contracts

Apr 18, 2011

NASA on Monday announced it has awarded nearly 270 million dollars to four companies, including Boeing and SpaceX, to help their pursuit of making a spacecraft to replace the US space shuttle.

SpaceX, NASA readies for April 30 launch to ISS

Mar 20, 2012

Preparations for the April 30 launch of the SpaceX's Dragon commercial spacecraft to the International Space Station are underway without major problems, a top NASA official said Tuesday.

Next-generation US space racers outline plans

Apr 28, 2011

A handful of companies competing to make the spaceship to replace the iconic US shuttle said Thursday they are racing to shrink what will be a long gap in flying Americans into space aboard US craft.

Recommended for you

The source of the sky's X-ray glow

15 hours ago

In findings that help astrophysicists understand our corner of the galaxy, an international research team has shown that the soft X-ray glow blanketing the sky comes from both inside and outside the solar system.

End dawns for Europe's space cargo delivery role

Jul 27, 2014

Europe will close an important chapter in its space flight history Tuesday, launching the fifth and final robot ship it had pledged for lifeline deliveries to the International Space Station.

Giant crater in Russia's far north sparks mystery

Jul 26, 2014

A vast crater discovered in a remote region of Siberia known to locals as "the end of the world" is causing a sensation in Russia, with a group of scientists being sent to investigate.

NASA Mars spacecraft prepare for close comet flyby

Jul 26, 2014

NASA is taking steps to protect its Mars orbiters, while preserving opportunities to gather valuable scientific data, as Comet C/2013 A1 Siding Spring heads toward a close flyby of Mars on Oct. 19.

Bacteria manipulate salt to build shelters to hibernate

Jul 25, 2014

For the first time, Spanish researchers have detected an unknown interaction between microorganisms and salt. When Escherichia coli cells are introduced into a droplet of salt water and is left to dry, b ...

How do we terraform Venus?

Jul 25, 2014

It might be possible to terraform Venus some day, when our technology gets good enough. The challenges for Venus are totally different than for Mars. How will we need to fix Venus?

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Russkiycremepuff
1 / 5 (2) May 17, 2012
No, really? Is Miss Garver the queen of stating the obvious? NASA stabs itself in the foot with retiring shuttles and then complains about having to spend money for seats on Soyuz? $63 million per seat is fair price to send American and European cosmonauts to ISS. Do they think money for fuel and maintenance grows on trees?
American companies competing for first place is cutthroat business. They should work with Russians for best ideas.
alfie_null
5 / 5 (1) May 18, 2012
Over the long term (a foreign concept to congress), fostering a home grown (i.e. American) commercial space industry seems more important than quickly regaining the ability to fly to a likely ephemeral space station.
Kimben
not rated yet May 20, 2012
First i have to say this, NASA did not retire the shuttle without a back up plan, they presented a new inproved shuttle design to Congress, and Congress killed it. Then Obama killed the only other program. Washington D.C. is going to kill America's ability to ever agian reach space, unless you people do your own research and put the blame where it belongs. Yes the econamy took a major hit in 2008, we are bottomed out, i hope, right now, and by 2013 will start climbing out of this hole, if Washington D.C. will get out of the way. Without compatition, all we will have is NASA jr., compatition keeps cost down, olny an idiot would not see that, oh wait, we are talking about Congress after all :). I say, to keep America's space program alive till 2013, tell congress to let NASA do what they do best, just give them the funds to do it.