MAJORANA, the search for the most elusive neutrino of all

May 17, 2012 By Paul Preuss
The helicity, or handedness, of neutrinos has only been observed in two states, left-handed neutrinos and right-handed antineutrinos. Whether these are really the only two neutrino handedness states depends on whether neutrinos are their own antiparticles.

( -- In a cavern almost a mile underground in the Black Hills, an experiment called the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR, 40 kilograms of pure germanium crystals enclosed in deep-freeze cryostat modules, will soon set out to answer one of the most persistent and momentous questions in physics: are neutrinos their own antiparticles? If the answer is yes, it will require rewriting the Standard Model of Particles and Interactions, our basic understanding of the physical world.

“The best way to learn whether neutrinos are their own would be to observe a certain kind of radioactive decay, called neutrinoless double-beta decay. It has never been detected conclusively, and if it occurs at all, it’s exceedingly rare,” says Alan Poon of the Nuclear Science Division at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab).

Poon is the current executive-committee chair of the MAJORANA Collaboration, which is comprised of more than 100 researchers from 19 institutions in the United States, Canada, Russia, and Japan, and whose efforts are focused on the experiment now under construction at the Davis Campus of the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) in Lead, South Dakota.

Beta decay, single and double

Ordinary beta decay is a common kind of radioactivity: an atomic nucleus changes into a different kind of element, a neighbor on the periodic table with lower mass, by emitting a beta particle – an electron or positron – plus a neutrino or an antineutrino. For example, carbon-14 transforms to nitrogen-14 when one of its neutrons turns into a proton, emitting an electron and an antineutrino. It was beta decay that led to the proposal that there must be a particle like the neutrino, since an electron alone could not account for all the energy lost in the decay.

“Double-beta decay is also possible and has been observed in a dozen different isotopes since 1986,” says Poon. “But it happens at a really low rate, and not too many nuclei can do it.”

The only conclusive double-beta decays seen so far involve two neutrons that change into two protons while emitting two electrons and two antineutrinos. It’s an uncommon situation, in which single beta decay is blocked because the decaying isotope’s immediate neighbor has a nucleus that’s too heavy, but the nucleus of the neighbor two places away on the periodic table does have lower mass – even though its atomic number is two places higher. Getting there requires double-beta decay.

One of the relatively few nuclei that can transform by double-beta decay is germanium-76 (76Ge), an isotope that accounts for less than eight percent of naturally occurring germanium. Germanium-76 can’t change to its neighbor, arsenic-76, but it can change to selenium-76, two places higher on the periodic table.

Carbon 14 decays to nitrogen 14 by emitting an electron and an antineutrino, while changing one of its neutrons to a proton and transforming the nucleus one place higher in the periodic table - a common kind of single beta decay. In a rare double-beta decay, for example when germanium 76 changes to selenium 76, two neutrons change to protons while emitting two electrons and two antineutrinos, transforming the nucleus two places higher in the periodic table.

Many reference works refer to germanium-76 as stable, but double-beta decays of 76Ge have been observed since the 1990s, and its half-life has recently been estimated at 1.3 x 1021 years, or roughly one and a third sextillion years. That’s 100 trillion times the age of the universe. Not quite stable.

How do you detect such a rare event? If you watch a single germanium-76 atom for one and a third sextillion years, the chances are 50-50 you’ll see it decay. On the other hand, if you watch one and a third sextillion germanium-76 atoms for just one year, the chances are 50-50 that you’ll catch at least one of them decaying.

In essence, that’s what MAJORANA proposes to do. The full MAJORANA concept calls for a metric ton or so of germanium diode detectors, enriched to 86 percent 76Ge. Over the course of a year, a detector that size has a good chance of catching double-beta decays, although most will be accompanied by a pair of antineutrinos.

Searching for an absence of neutrinos

Identifying neutrinoless double-beta decays depends crucially on getting rid of background from cosmic rays and natural radioactivity in the surroundings. That’s the purpose of the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR: to show that achieving a low enough background is indeed possible. A mile of rock overhead is an effective shield against most cosmic ray debris, but radioactivity from the environment, including from impurities in the experiment’s own components, is harder to avoid.

Individual detectors made of pure germanium are assembled in strings and remotely loaded into the lead- and copper-shielded MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR.

Jason Detwiler of the Nuclear Science Division, who has been involved with the MAJORANA project since 2005, says, “We’re spending a lot of time modeling every one of the DEMONSTRATOR’s thousands of individual parts, to make sure we can achieve the lowest backgrounds of any experiment of this kind ever – a hundred times lower.”

The MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR will be shielded with multiple layers of copper and lead against radioactive elements in the surrounding rock, and the detector will be built from ultrapure materials. Copper components are being formed underground in special facilities at SURF, to remove natural radioactivity and prevent contamination from cosmic rays.

Equally important is the detector’s ability to distinguish the background from double-beta decays inside the detector itself. Pure germanium is ideal for this purpose, both as a source of double-beta decays and, says Detwiler, as a detector that “can register the signal of nuclear decays cleanly, beautifully, and in high resolution.”

Nuclear decays and other events create charge carriers that drift toward the collecting electrode on the surface of the germanium diode. The way the carriers drift – their “pulse shape” – will clearly distinguish background events from a neutrinoless double-beta decay.

“Berkeley Lab developed germanium detectors decades ago, so we have a history of strength and expertise in design and manufacture,” Detwiler says. “We’re working with a U.S.-based commercial vendor to turn germanium-76, enriched at an isotope separation facility in Russia, into working detectors. We’ll mount them with low-noise electronics developed here.”

The first pure germanium in the DEMONSTRATOR will be a natural mix of isotopes, setting a baseline for response to background events. Eventually 30 kilograms of the detector’s 40-kilogram total will be enriched to 86-percent germanium-76, narrowing the chance that background signals could compete with the discovery of an actual neutrinoless double-beta decay event.

In neutrinoless double-beta decay, a single particle would be emitted as one neutron changes to a proton. This right-handed antineutrino would be absorbed as a left-handed neutrino by a second neutron, causing it too to change to a proton. Two electrons account for the total difference in energy between the nuclei.

Such an event would be easy to identify, because the energy of its two electrons would add to precisely 2.039 million electron volts (2.039 MeV), and none would be shared with antineutrinos. With a low enough background, MAJORANA will be able to easily separate the sharp spike of a 2.039 MeV two-electron event from a broad smear of energies shared among four different particles.

Rewriting the Standard Model

Mass is essential to oscillation among the three neutrino flavors, but no one knows the precise mass of any of the flavors or why it’s so small. Neutrinoless double-beta decay offers a unique window on that question. If MAJORANA can go beyond showing that neutrinoless double-beta decay exists to showing how often it occurs, it may be able to establish the mass scale of neutrinos directly.

The key is their handedness, or helicity (which refers to how their linear momentum and quantum spin are aligned). If neutrinos and antineutrinos are two distinct , each could be either right-handed or left-handed, for a total of four quantum states. If neutrinos and antineutrinos are just one particle, however, it has only two states of handedness. In fact only two states, left-handed neutrinos and right-handed antineutrinos, have ever been observed.

A diagram of neutrinoless double-beta decay shows a right-handed antineutrino emitted when a neutron decays (also emitting an electron). The antineutrino flips its handedness and is absorbed by a second neutron, which also decays (and emits a second electron). Only a single antiparticle/particle is involved. How fast it can flip its handedness depends on its mass: the more massive, the easier the flip, and the more often this kind of decay will occur.

But there’s a catch, says Poon. “The fascinating thing about neutrinoless double-beta decay is that it would violate one of the basic principles of the Standard Model, in which all interactions supposedly conserve lepton number. Electrons and neutrinos are both leptons, so if an interaction produces two electrons, that’s a plus two. In the usual kind of double–beta decay, two antineutrinos are also emitted – antiparticles with minus lepton numbers, which is a minus two. Lepton number is conserved at zero.” Not so with neutrinoless double-beta decay, however, which raises the lepton number from zero to two.

“The leaves many outstanding questions, and we know it needs revision,” Poon says, “but we cannot write a new theory until we know if neutrinos are their own antiparticles, or how we’re going to accommodate the loss of lepton number conservation if they are, and a number of other questions, including neutrino mass.”

In the race to answer these questions, the MAJORANA Collaboration is competing with another important germanium experiment, the GERDA experiment at the underground Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy. But it’s a competition with a twist:

“GERDA has a different shielding concept, using liquid argon and water, and between us we’ll find out which has the lower background,” says Poon. “We may join forces to build the final one-ton detector.”

Germanium-76 is not the only element that can undergo double-beta decay. Other detectors use isotopes of tellurium, xenon, neodymium, or other elements. Poon says, “It’s important to establish that any instance of neutrinoless double-beta decay really reflects the property of the neutrino. If the process is seen in more than one element, that’s very strong evidence that the neutrino is indeed its own antiparticle.”

Explore further: Neutron tomography technique reveals phase fractions of crystalline materials in 3-dimensions

More information: The MAJORANA Collaboration home page is at
More about the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR and neutrinoless double-beta decay is at

Related Stories

Stalking the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay

Feb 12, 2010

( -- The hunt for the elusive neutrino mass has officially begun. This difficult-to-detect elementary particle travels close to the speed of light, is electrically neutral, and can pass through ...

Muon makes tracks in EXO-200 detector

Feb 01, 2011

( -- The Enriched Xenon Observatory-200, a prototype observatory that will search for exotic decays of fundamental particles of matter, passed a significant if unofficial milestone last month: ...

How slow is slow? EXO knows

Sep 09, 2011

( -- Cooks think of watched pots. Handymen grumble about drying paint. Kids dread the endless night before Christmas morning.

CUORE experiment gets to the 'heart' of the anti-matter

Jan 11, 2011

Marisa Pedretti, a post-doctoral researcher since January 2009 in the Experimental Nuclear Physics group of the Physics Division of the Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, was recently selected as the ...

What keeps the Earth cooking?

Jul 17, 2011

What spreads the sea floors and moves the continents? What melts iron in the outer core and enables the Earth's magnetic field? Heat. Geologists have used temperature measurements from more than 20,000 boreholes ...

Recommended for you

50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet installed at Fermilab

3 hours ago

One year ago, the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet arrived at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois after traveling 3,200 miles over land and sea from Long Island, ...

Spin-based electronics: New material successfully tested

Jul 30, 2014

Spintronics is an emerging field of electronics, where devices work by manipulating the spin of electrons rather than the current generated by their motion. This field can offer significant advantages to computer technology. ...

User comments : 17

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (12) May 17, 2012
Even though I can't wrap my head around most of this stuff I still find myself facsinated by it. Quantum spin, double beta decay, neutrinos, anti particles, electrons, protons, Voltron (couldnt resist adding that last one). Mind blowing stuff. I think we need to introduce physics in school much earlier, we underestimate the ability of young minds to comprehend these subjects. Get them understanding the basics early then let their imagination run wild with fresh innovative ideas.
1 / 5 (13) May 17, 2012
In water surface analogy of space-time in dense aether model the neutrinos are analogy of underwater Falaco solitons in similar way, like the photons are analogy of surface Russel's solitons. If you would watch the video above linked, you can recognize, how these solitons periodically disappear and emerge at the water surface again (it's even loudly commented at the above video). This breathing is common for all quantum wave packets and what happens during this is, that the soliton changes the dimensionality of its motion during this, which is called the Widnall's instability for common vortex rings.
1 / 5 (2) May 17, 2012
"we underestimate the ability of young minds to comprehend these subjects"

Really...? What do you reckon is "basic physics" and at what age do you think it would be understood?
May 17, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
May 17, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1 / 5 (11) May 17, 2012
Does the sterile neutrino violate the special relativity, if it would propagate superluminaly? Yes and not. IMO actually not, because it cannot be observed directly during its existence - because such a neutrino lack any charge, it cannot interact with anything. Such a neutrino will effectively dissolve in vacuum fluctuations for every observer and it recreate itself again after while - so that what we will observe during this would be actually two different particles, which don't violate the causality of special relativity. From macroscopic perspective such a neutral neutrino would still propagate along original path in slightly superluminal speed. We just cannot observe it with using of light along whole this path continuously. If we cannot observe the superluminal object, then the special relativity has no problem.
5 / 5 (9) May 17, 2012
Such disappointing comments for such an interesting article. The usual riff-raff here are embarrassing.
2.3 / 5 (3) May 17, 2012
This article is really informative for people, who are somewhat experienced in subject - but who can imagine, what the neutrinos actually are, what makes them charged and sterile, etc? For example, could you explain, why the presence of sterile neutrino should manifest itself with decay into pair of electrons?
5 / 5 (6) May 17, 2012
agreed, i was all excited and then find out its a bunch of nonsense comments from zephyr.
1 / 5 (3) May 17, 2012
I do perceive rather interesting, the behavior of neutrinos is so similar to behavior of quite common solitons, which everyone can make yourself at his swimming pool.

I really don't expect, the usual haters will start to love me for my analogies suddenly just after five years of negativism.
3 / 5 (2) May 17, 2012
Neutrinoless double beta decay was reported by Klapdor Kleingrothaus. There is every reason to redo this search, but there is no reason to keep it out of this story. That's not how science should act.
not rated yet May 17, 2012
A recent summary of the status of the Heidelberg-Moscow-experiment can be also found here. Apparently the lobby of detector physicists (IGEX, CoGeNT) doesn't want to end with their experiments prematurely. And for news servers every experiment is sorta "breaktrough" - no matter how repetitive it actually may be.
not rated yet May 17, 2012
Origin/Zephyr is a webmaster living in Zurich.
5 / 5 (2) May 17, 2012
Origin/Zephyr originally proposed Dense Reefer Theory (DRT) in High Times forums, but curiously, were not even taken seriously there...
5 / 5 (2) May 18, 2012
i take that as an insult to medicinal marijuana users, such as myself.
vlaaing peerd
5 / 5 (1) May 21, 2012
In Dense Spacecake Theory (DST) The universe of both big and small can be observed as a huge cake. The structure of the cake represents the filaments of matter that is quite evenly distributed across the universe, of course the many observations of our universes structure have over and over again supported and confirmed DST.

Now the little parts such as neutrino's hardly ever interact with spacecake and therefore litterally fly though the cake, making it virtually impossible to directly detect a neutrino inside spacecake. Observations also supports this part of the theory, as up to now no single neutrino has ever been observed to interact with cake to this day.

The challenge for the scientist on this project is to distinguish something in the abundance of particles inside the cake-field as we all know spacecake largely consists of Majorihuana particles themselves.
not rated yet May 21, 2012
One form of beta decay is a neutron to a proton giving off an electron/antineutrino pair and the other form gives off a positron/neutrino pair. Could these two differing beta decays not be the likely path for double beta decay event as the electron and positron annihilate and the neutrino and antineutrino annihilate? This would give a "leptonless" double beta decay so preserving the lepton number requirement.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 04, 2012
IMO this transition corresponds so called neutrino color oscillations, during which the neutrino vortex is changing its generation number, so called the "flavour". But there are another possible transitions. For example the neutrino may appear like left hand and right-hand vortices, which correspond the particles and antiparticles. When the neutrino condenses, it's rolling across space like vortex without parity symmetry, which may decompose into one of anti-symetrics forms (1).
1 / 5 (1) Jun 04, 2012
So we can imagine the neutrinos like vortex ring, which is rolling through space in form of right-hand wortex and it expands and condenses and it changes its particle generations periodically during this (flavour neutrino oscillations). Under certain situation the parity of vortex will change during this (parity oscillations of particle into antiparticle and back again) and during these rare events the neutrino becomes a neutral Majorana particle (sterile neutrino or so called the Goldstone boson).

The typical for neutral fermions is, they do propagate trough vacuum like gravitational waves (gravitons) with superluminal speed, so that the sterile neutrino is supposed to make a sudden jump through space during this this transition. I even presume, just this effect accounts to the recent observations of superluminal neutrinos, which would otherwise propagate through vacuum with subluminal speed.