What's the best irrigation canal liner?

May 25, 2012
Workers in Hidalgo County spread concrete over a synthetic canal liner made of polyester. Credit: Texas AgriLife Extension, Askar Karimov

There are an estimated 1.2 million acres of agricultural land in Texas irrigated via canals, and many are in need of renovation, according to a Texas AgriLife Extension Service expert.

Historically, irrigation canals were basically just earthen ditches, according to Dr. Guy Fipps, AgriLife Extension irrigation engineer, College Station. But due to the burgeoning over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the awareness of the need to reduce from canals through seepage.

Traditionally, the most common renovations were to replace smaller canals with pipelines and line larger canals with concrete, Fipps said. But lining canals with concrete is expensive and requires significant upkeep, particularly in Texas’ “shrink-swell” soils.

However, today irrigation districts have options other than just concrete.

“There is a revolution in material sciences happening, with many new and innovative products coming on the market, including synthetic liners that are promoted for use in many applications,” he said.

These new synthetic materials offer better, less-expensive choices than lining canals with concrete alone, Fipps said. Choosing the right liner, however, is not a simple task. There are some that are more suited to a given situation – and an irrigation district’s budget. There are also tradeoffs to be considered, such as ease of installation, durability, resistance to human and animal traffic, and cost.

To help irrigation districts make the best choices, Fipps and his associates recently completed a seven-year evaluation of nine synthetic canal liners in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.

“Initially, we used a very simple visual rating system,” Fipps said. “However, we quickly noticed that exactly the same material would fail completely in one location while remaining in excellent condition in others. Thus, our visual rating system evolved significantly over time as we sought to document the causes of such site-specific performance.”

Fipps and his team wound up using a two-step process, combining a visual rating scale and quantitative analysis.

“The rating gives us an overall indicator of the condition of each project, and how the material fairs over time,” he said. “The quantitative analysis is used to interpret the ratings and to identify the factors that are likely causing lower ratings than would otherwise be expected.”

Some of the factors affecting performance were expected by Fipps and his team members, who have decades of experience evaluating and improving irrigation systems in Texas.

One obvious source of problems is improper installation, he said. Irrigation districts are always trying to keep their costs low in order to minimize increases in fees paid by their farmers and other customers. Some choose to do the installation themselves, and this can lead to various problems if the staff is not sufficiently trained.

Poor installation issues include poor anchoring of the liner at the top of the canal, improper seams of liners around gates, valves and other structures, as well as inadequate stretching of liners at installation.

“Water seeping under the top anchor can result in floating and even buckling of concrete being used as a protective barrier,” Fipps said. “Proper seaming of materials around structures, gates and valves takes skill. District personnel may not have sufficient training or use the right products.”

Other factors that need to be taken into account when choosing a liner are smoothness and stability of the material underneath the liner.

“Some of the thinner liners definitely shouldn’t be used over cracked concrete as they are easily pierced,” he said.

And traffic — both human and animal — also turned out to be significant factors.

“Do kids swim in the canals?” Fipps said. “Much of what we classified as ‘unintentional damage’ appeared to be caused by kids grabbing onto folds or loose spots in the liners while pulling themselves out of the canal.”

Also, cattle hooves can puncture some of the thinner materials, he noted. Other damage was caused by mowing near where the liner is anchored to the top of the canal.

“Then there’s the maintenance factor,” he said. “Timely maintenance and minor repairs can prevent small problems from becoming serious.”

Fipps and his associates rated the following types of liners:

– Polyester with protective barrier of 2 to 3 inches of shotcrete.
– PVC with protective barrier of 2 to 3 inches of concrete.
– Polypropylene (Two polypropylene layers over a coarse fabric reinforcement).
– Ethylene propylene diene monomer, commonly known as EPDM, rubber (non‐reinforced, 0.045 inch thick).
– Polyurethane (two layers of plastic over a non-permeable reinforcement).
– Thermoplastic PolyOlefin, commonly known as TPO, geomembrane (0.045 inch thick).
– Reinforced Ethylene propylene diene monomer (0.045 inch thick).
– Reinforced FPP-R, (a rubber-based product over a non-permeable membrane).

So what’s the best overall renovation?

“It’s a synthetic liner with a protective barrier on top of concrete or shotcrete.” he said.

Beyond that, it gets complicated, Fipps said, depending on kids, cows, mowing, installation expertise and, of course, money.

“Also, there’s little difference between the cost of the various liners, but skill levels in the field vary widely,” he said.

The teams’ full report on the seven-year study can be found at the AgriLife Extension website for irrigation district information at idea.tamu.edu .

Explore further: Global CO2 emissions increase to new all-time record, but growth is slowing down

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rains wreak havoc on South Texas onion crop

Apr 20, 2012

The late March storm that pelted McAllen with hail and most of the Lower Rio Grande Valley with rain also turned the area’s onion crop on its head, according to a Texas AgriLife Extension Service expert.

Recommended for you

Obama bars oil, gas drilling in Alaska haven

11 hours ago

President Barack Obama declared Alaska's ecologically rich Bristol Bay off-limits for oil and gas exploration on Tuesday, saying the move was necessary to safeguard the region's fishing and tourism industries.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
1 / 5 (1) May 25, 2012
I think the question is: How and what do we use to COVER all of the major canals in the US?
I'll bet dollars to donuts that the US looses much more intransit water due to evaporation rather than leakage.
Jonseer
1 / 5 (1) May 26, 2012
I think the question is: How and what do we use to COVER all of the major canals in the US?
I'll bet dollars to donuts that the US looses much more intransit water due to evaporation rather than leakage.


Or better yet, to take your idea further along, how about with all that concrete and plastic just build pipes to transport it.

I think that is the reason the "man made river" in Libya used to transport the desert fossil waters from deep inside the Sahara to the coast ended up using pipes - it eliminates almost all the loss from evaporation and leakage.
kaasinees
1 / 5 (2) May 26, 2012
Americans are one thing but Texans sheesh, those are really the bottom line of the human pile.
rwinners
1 / 5 (1) May 26, 2012
@jonseer. Agreed. But covering existing viaducts like those in California would be very much easier and less expensive.
Now, we need to come up with a answer to the storage reservoirs.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.