Group finds circadian clock common to almost all life forms

May 17, 2012 by Bob Yirka report
The peroxiredoxin active site is highly conserved in all domains of life. Image: Nature (2012) doi:10.1038/nature11088

(Phys.org) -- A group of biology researchers, led by Akhilesh Reddy from Cambridge University have found an enzyme that they believe serves as a circadian clock that operates in virtually all forms of life. In a paper published in the journal Nature, they describe a class of enzymes known as peroxiredoxins which are present in almost all plants and other organisms and which appear to serve as a basic ingredient in non-feedback loop biological clocks.

Up till now, researchers have not been able to find any kind of common biorhythmic clock among the ’s varied , each class seemed to have its own. They did find though that one common feature of most was a , which is where genes are transcribed before being translated into proteins which then build up until they reach a tipping point. Once that happens, transcription is turned off and the goes dormant. This cycle, for most organisms occurs on a twenty four hour basis, and is responsible for such things as the feelings of sleepiness or hunger in people that occur at roughly the same time each day.

But now, this new research suggests that the true clock controlling behavior in virtually every imaginable plant, animal, fungus, etc. has its roots in an enzyme whose purpose is to help clean up residue left over from the ravages of antioxidants.

Peroxiredoxins, which exist in virtually all life forms, are enzymes that cycle between two states depending on whether they have reacted recently with hydrogen peroxide, or not. The researchers found that this cycle occurs on a roughly twenty four hour cycle in all of the organisms they’ve tested to date. What’s more, the cycle continued even in the absence of light, proving that it’s not part of a feedback loop. Unfortunately, the team has not yet been able to show how or if the enzyme controls other clock mechanisms that are a part of feedback loops.

The team suggests that peroxiredoxins developed their cyclical behavior just after organisms began to develop some two and half billion years ago that were able to handle the increased amounts of oxygen that had begun to appear in the atmosphere in a time period known as the Great Oxidation Event; the time when bacteria developed photosynthesis and began pumping out oxygen. Those organisms that managed to survive had to develop a means of dealing with the damage caused by antioxidants, and thus was born the role of peroxiredoxins. And because oxygen levels rose and fell on a regular daily schedule, the enzymes developed a clock over time to help predict when to go to work, and when to remain dormant, thus paving the way for the first .

Explore further: 'Chase and run' cell movement mechanism explains process of metastasis

More information: Peroxiredoxins are conserved markers of circadian rhythms, Nature (2012) doi:10.1038/nature11088

Abstract
Cellular life emerged ~3.7 billion years ago. With scant exception, terrestrial organisms have evolved under predictable daily cycles owing to the Earth’s rotation. The advantage conferred on organisms that anticipate such environmental cycles has driven the evolution of endogenous circadian rhythms that tune internal physiology to external conditions. The molecular phylogeny of mechanisms driving these rhythms has been difficult to dissect because identified clock genes and proteins are not conserved across the domains of life: Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota. Here we show that oxidation–reduction cycles of peroxiredoxin proteins constitute a universal marker for circadian rhythms in all domains of life, by characterizing their oscillations in a variety of model organisms. Furthermore, we explore the interconnectivity between these metabolic cycles and transcription–translation feedback loops of the clockwork in each system. Our results suggest an intimate co-evolution of cellular timekeeping with redox homeostatic mechanisms after the Great Oxidation Event ~2.5 billion years ago.

Press release

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New way to improve antibiotic production

10 hours ago

An antibiotic has been found to stimulate its own production. The findings, to be published in PNAS, could make it easier to scale up antibiotic production for commercialisation.

Single cells: Same same but different

Jun 12, 2013

(Phys.org) —If half of a cell population were coloured white and the other half were coloured black, scientists should think all cells are grey. Conventional methods average over thousands of cells, overlooking ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fort
4 / 5 (4) May 17, 2012
Important typo -
"... some two and half MILLION years ago that were able to handle the increased amounts of oxygen that had begun to appear in the atmosphere in a time period known as the Great Oxidation Event;"

It's supposed to be "billion" right?
gmfr
5 / 5 (2) May 17, 2012
"Those organisms that managed to survive had to develop a means of dealing with the damage caused by antioxidants"

Shouldn't this be "damage caused by oxidation" instead of "damage caused by antioxidants"?
thingumbobesquire
1 / 5 (1) May 17, 2012
This appears to be a part of an energy throughput and cycling scaffold which all life forms have in common and would appear to be an absolute boundary separating lithospheric and biospheric processes. Further as life evolves it can capture and reduce energy at higher rates. The next such absolute boundary separates the biosphere from human technological creativity or noosphere. Our species alone can change our mode of functioning to higher energy flux densities...
Russkiycremepuff
1 / 5 (1) May 17, 2012
@gmfr
I believe you are correct, but I am not expert. The antioxidant is a chemical compound that reduces the damage caused by oxidation, as in free radicals that may promote cancer.

"With scant exception, terrestrial organisms have evolved under predictable daily cycles owing to the EARTH'S ROTATION. The advantage conferred on organisms that anticipate such environmental cycles has driven the evolution of endogenous circadian rhythms that tune internal physiology to external conditions." - emphasis mine -

It appears that the "circadian clock" may not be in tune with 4th dimensional time, as on other planets the 24 hour clock is different in number of hours, and all living organisms have differing circadian rhythms. It appears that environment and other conditions affect this clock, not time itself unless effects of circadian clocks are measured with mechanical clocks. Is there equation that fits this circadian clock?
verkle
1 / 5 (4) May 17, 2012
I was really enjoying the article, until I got to the paragraph:
"The team suggests...began to develop some two and half million years ago..."

Good science until this paragraph. Trying to tie science with vague postulations about what happened millions (or was that billions?) of years ago is crappy work.

Let's do science without having to tie everything to the religion of atheism!

B Fast
5 / 5 (4) May 17, 2012
Verkle, "Let's do science without having to tie everything to the religion of atheism!"
Hmm, it is only athiests that view the world as ancient? The guys at uncommondescent.com claim to not be atheists, but most seem to accept that the earth is old. I understand that Muslims see the earth as old -- not atheists. Jehovah Witnesses view the earth as old -- not atheists. The Hindu view is that the universe always was -- not atheists either.

A small subset of Christians, and maybe Jews view the earth as 4000 years old. These are by no means the only non-atheists.
Peteri
5 / 5 (1) May 18, 2012
...the religion of atheism!


Talk about an oxymoron!

It's a great pity some people keep whining on about their parochial brand of religion on a science forum!
robatk
not rated yet May 18, 2012
It seems to me that there may be more potential in this work than is commonly realized. It life emerged from the relatively static environment of a sea vent, perhaps no such mechanism was required? If that were true, in addition to being a highly conserved structure, perhaps we could start to narrow the field as to possible places for the origin of life event to take place. It would be great to have some more comprehensive analysis of the results.

More news stories

New way to improve antibiotic production

An antibiotic has been found to stimulate its own production. The findings, to be published in PNAS, could make it easier to scale up antibiotic production for commercialisation.

New language discovery reveals linguistic insights

A new language has been discovered in a remote Indigenous community in northern Australia that is generated from a unique combination of elements from other languages. Light Warlpiri has been documented by University of Michigan ...