Greater transparency leads to better fund performance, new finance research shows

May 22, 2012

(Phys.org) -- U.S. laws and regulations on investment management address potential conflicts of interest between investors and managers through disclosure requirements. Surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of these standards in resolving such conflicts, says Greg Kadlec, R.B. Pamplin Professor of Finance in the Pamplin College of Business.

Kadlec co-authored a recent study that offers new on the role of disclosure, finding that greater transparency about a fund’s operating expenditures lowers the fund’s and improves return performance.

Agency conflicts can arise whenever people delegate control of assets to others, Kadlec says. A particularly important agency conflict exists between shareholders and of a corporation. “Shareholders want managers to maximize the value of the corporation, whereas managers want to maximize their own welfare. This conflict can result in managers acting inefficiently or even corruptly with respect to the shareholders’ interest.”

The colossal failures of Drexel Burnham Lambert, Enron, Lehman Brothers, and the Madoff fund, he says, “all stem from agency conflict.” Anticipating and resolving these conflicts improves the efficiency of corporations and capital allocation in the economy.

In their study, Kadlec and his co-authors Roger M. Edelen, of the University of California, Davis, and Richard Evans, of the University of Virginia, investigate the role of disclosure in mutual fund agency conflicts by examining the two different ways that fund managers can pay for operating costs — approaches that differ greatly in transparency — and comparing their effects on return performance.

Their study, “Disclosure and Agency Conflict: Evidence from Mutual Fund Commission Bundling,” is published in the Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 103, 308-326.

Explore further: How financial decisions are made

More information: Read more about Kadlec’s study in this story, “Greater transparency leads to better fund performance” in the spring 2012 Pamplin magazine.

Provided by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

4 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hedge fund share restrictions favor managers over investors

Dec 19, 2011

Armed with insider knowledge, managers of share-restricted hedge funds sell off their own holdings ahead of their investors in order to avoid low returns produced by an outflow of shareholder dollars, according to a new study ...

Getting aid to where it is needed

Jul 04, 2011

In the early 2000s, the international aid community started to fund health programs through Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) which provide aid and support for tackling infectious diseases, and for implementing immunization ...

Recommended for you

How financial decisions are made

7 hours ago

Jayant Kale didn't grow up dreaming of becoming a leading expert in corporate finance and mutual fund investment. But he's happy he invested in that market early in life.

Less is more in lap of luxury

8 hours ago

Chandeliers, gold taps and ornate drapes are classic hallmarks of the world's most luxurious hotels, right? Wrong, according to Flinders University sociologist Eduardo de la Fuente.

Has microfinance lost its moral compass?

13 hours ago

The industry that provides financial services for people on low-incomes and without access to traditional banking services is morally reprehensible according to new research from The University of Manchester.

User comments : 0