Country cousins: Climate connections and land urbanization dynamics

May 28, 2012 by Stuart Mason Dambrot feature
Place-based vs. process-based conceptualizations of land. Copyright © PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117622109

(Phys.org) -- What’s in a name? Quite a bit in climate science, where the term teleconnection refers not to digital communications, but rather to a recurring and persistent large-scale pattern of pressure and circulation anomalies that spans vast geographical areas. Recently, environmental researchers at Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies reframed the discussion around the linkages between land changes and underlying urbanization dynamics by introducing urban land teleconnections as a conceptual framework for studying the multivariate nature of these processes in an integrated and productive manner.

Associate Professor Karen C. Seto describes the conceptual and evaluative challenges in jointly evaluating land classification that asserts a rural–urban dichotomy, place-based spatial quantification, and assumptions about path dependency and sequential land changes. “A single location may have limited land covers – that is, what’s actually on the landscape, such as trees, concrete, and buildings – but land use is multi-dimensional, even at one location,” Seto tells Phys.org. “For example, a plot that has trees could be an orchard for farm or agricultural use, a recreational park, biodiversity corridor, carbon sink, and so on. To say that one place is only rural or only urban is fundamentally contrary to how the land is actually being used.” Furthermore, she points out, urban and rural are poorly defined. In reality, it’s not only a gradient, but more likely a matrix of types of rural-like and urban-like uses.

Urban land teleconnections. Copyright © PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117622109

“When we assume that there are path dependencies with land use, as when forest becomes agriculture becomes urban, we only look for patterns that fit those trajectories,” Seto continues. “Neglecting the complex, overlapping and multifarious nature of urbanization and land use change processes – and in particular, the role the distal connections between them – can lead to misguided policies and practice, deviations from paths of sustainable development and missed opportunities for increases in human well-being.” In addressing these issues, one of the researchers’ key conclusions was that neglecting the distal connections between land change and urbanization can lead to incorrect conclusions, misleading results, and unintended negative consequences in distal places.

Going forward, there are a number of additional research innovations the team has planned. “One of the things we wanted to underscore in the paper is that there are actually many methods that already exist which could be employed to analyze urban land teleconnections,” notes Seto. “The problem is that they’re not being integrated or utilized in new ways to address this issue.” In additional, she adds, they’re exploring ways to operationalize the concept with data.

Four major types of urban land teleconnections. Copyright © PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117622109

One of the most important considerations will be the ways in which their findings impact key environmental challenges. “Urban and land use sustainability are integrally connected but often in ways that are spatially disconnected as well as in non-linear ways.” Seto explains. “As we enter the ‘century of the city,’ we need new conceptual frameworks and analytical approaches that enable us to examine the tradeoffs and consequences of decisions that extend beyond the local immediate area. Using the conceptual framework we’ve introduced in our paper can help conduct holistic analyses of the underlying and variety of spatial effects of production and consumption, and develop policies that promote viable and fair solutions in distal and multiple places.”

Another important effect is how urban land teleconnections could help research communities frame scientific inquiries. “If we continue to conceptualize urban or land-use sustainability as a solely localized issue and don’t link them to the underlying drivers or impacts that are located in distal places, we’re unlikely to develop policies or solutions that have meaningful systemic impact. Rather, it is possible to develop local policies with positive impacts that have negative consequences far away. Moreover, Seto concludes, there are other areas of research that might benefit from their findings, including environmental justice, sustainability and resource use.

Explore further: Changing global diets is vital to reducing climate change

More information: Urban land teleconnections and sustainability, Published online before print May 1, 2012, PNAS May 15, 2012 vol. 109 no. 20 7687-7692, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117622109

Related Stories

Recommended for you

The underestimated risk of ethanol fireplaces

16 hours ago

Ethanol fireplaces are becoming more and more popular. However, they are not only highly combustible – in the past, severe accents have occurred repeatedly with decorative fireplaces. The devices also pollute ...

New research shows temperatures vary block by block

17 hours ago

This summer has seen the temperature rise above the severe heat mark of 90 degrees just five times, with the latest happening Wednesday afternoon. That's far fewer times than in an average New York summer.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

nappy
3.7 / 5 (3) May 29, 2012
As is too common, there is an assumption that some sort of central planning is neccessary. It is not. land ownership is the best. Land ownershiop by the citizen with little to NO regulations. Humans will figure out how to survive while a collective will figure out how to perish. Always.