Flying under the radar

Apr 30, 2012

An airplane carrying 96 passengers, including President of Poland Lech Kaczyński, the First Lady, nine top NATO generals and dozens of Polish dignitaries crashed near Smolensk, Russia, April 10, 2010, killing all aboard. The Russian government says the crash was an accident, but University of Akron professor Wieslaw Binienda, chair of the Department of Civil Engineering, disagrees. Binienda has spent the past two years combing details of the final report from the Russian investigation into the Smolensk crash, uncovering contradictions and discrepancies in the report and backing his findings with scientific evidence.

Restricted entry to the crash site, victims' bodies in sealed coffins, and the aircraft's undisclosed black boxes raised a disturbing red flag for Binienda, and prompted him to voluntarily investigate the Russian findings.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

One particular discrepancy caught Binienda's attention. The report indicated that the plane, after losing one-third of its wing when it snipped a birch tree, flew upward 30 meters, and then inverted and crashed, killing everybody aboard.

"I could not agree with this scenario. An without a wing crashes. It can't fly upward after losing a major part of the wing," explains Binienda, who also serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

Analysis raises contradictions

Binienda developed a computerized simulation of the aircraft-crash scenario based on the facts and data presented in the official report. For his analysis he used the same technology employed by NASA to analyze the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. His results contradicted conclusions made in the official Russian report. Binienda's simulation of the wing colliding with the birch tree demonstrates that the wing could not have been broken by a birch tree. In his simulations, Binienda analyzed various scenarios, including the worst-case scenario that assumed a larger diameter and higher density of the tree than officially investigated.

Binienda and a group of international experts have been working with the Polish Parliamentary Commission for the Investigation on the Smolensk crash. On March 28, 2012, a team of experts, including Binienda, presented their findings to the European Parliament. These findings challenge and invalidate the official conclusions. Binienda's scientific analysis will present the platform for his May 21 keynote address at a Polish-French symposium at Warsaw Technical University in Poland.

The controversy surrounding the investigation into the Smolensk crash, its high-profile victims who died while flying to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Katyn mass murder of the Polish elites, and Binienda's findings continue to raise questions about the crash. Binienda says he would like to see a new independent investigation committee formed to reinvestigate the .

Explore further: Mais non! French universities may teach in English

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Russia blames 'chance' defect for space crash

Sep 09, 2011

Russia on Friday blamed a one-off production fault in a rocket engine for the crash of an unmanned spaceship last month but nevertheless ordered checks of all similar rocket motors.

Ban On Russian Rokot Launches Lifted

Oct 26, 2005

The ban on launches of Russian Rokot boosters, which were blamed for the recent loss of a 140-million euro satellite belonging to the European Space Agency, has been lifted, a spokesman for the Russian Space Forces told RIA ...

Russia launches first Soyuz rocket since August crash

Oct 03, 2011

A Russian Soyuz-2 rocket launched a GLONASS navigation satellite on Sunday, the defence ministry said, in the first launch since a freighter carried by the flagship vehicle crashed into Earth in August.

Discovery debris may have struck wing

Jul 29, 2005

NASA scientists say a small piece of insulating foam that came off space shuttle Discovery during its Tuesday launch may have struck the orbiter's wing.

Recommended for you

Mais non! French universities may teach in English

11 hours ago

In France, there's a brewing debate over whether to speak anglais in universite. The National Assembly on Wednesday was taking up an education reform bill that would allow public universities to hold some courses—like science ...

US: NYU researchers took bribes from Chinese group

May 20, 2013

Three New York University researchers from China divulged results from a U.S.-funded study to Chinese competitors in exchange for tuition, rent and other expenses, federal prosecutors said Monday.

US scientist not involved in classified research: witnesses

May 17, 2013

Colleagues of a US scientist found hanged in Singapore last year told a coroner's inquiry Friday he was not involved in projects with military applications and was never asked to compromise any country's national security.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
not rated yet Apr 30, 2012
Ha, a "crashpot".
Origin
not rated yet Apr 30, 2012
the plane, after losing one-third of its wing when it snipped a birch tree, flew upward 30 meters, and then inverted and crashed, killing everybody aboard...I could not agree with this scenario. An airplane without a wing crashes. It can't fly...
Why the hell the plane couldn't fly with it 5/6 of wings just for 30 meters? 30 meters is the distance shorther than the plane itself (Tu-154 has a length 48 m).
rubberman
not rated yet Apr 30, 2012
Origin..they are saying that the plane gained 30 meters of altitude AFTER hitting the birch, which Binienda is saying is not possible. Not that the distance it flew was 30 meters.
awuma
not rated yet May 08, 2012
This is a classic GIGO result. University of Toronto astrophysicist, pilot and numerical simulation expert Prof.Pawel Artymowicz has shown that Binienda's inputs are wrong and that his calculations over-estimate the strength of the Tu-154M's outer wing. Binienda is acting as a front for extreme nationalist politicians in Poland. Everything indicates that the Smolensk crash had the usual chain of causal links, and breaking any one would have prevented the catastrophe. Mostly it was the incompetence and poor training of the pilots, in a badly commanded Air Force, aided somewhat by sub-standard Russian airport equipment and traffic control, all under the eye of a Commander-in-Chief with a known chronic case of get-there-itis. To suggest that this may have been a Russian conspiracy is simply absurd, even if subsequent Russian behaviour was unsatisfying to many in Poland. That's what the context of Binienda's (mis)calculations is.
Vendicar_Decarian
not rated yet May 08, 2012
An aircraft moving at a few hundred MPH couldn't gain altitude of 30 feet, stall and crash?

It has more than enough energy to do that. Even with it's engines not working and zero thrust.

"Binienda, who also serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Aerospace Engineering." is clearly incompetent.

More news stories

Mais non! French universities may teach in English

In France, there's a brewing debate over whether to speak anglais in universite. The National Assembly on Wednesday was taking up an education reform bill that would allow public universities to hold some courses—like science ...

Theorists weigh in on where to hunt dark matter

(Phys.org) —Now that it looks like the hunt for the Higgs boson is over, particles of dark matter are at the top of the physics "Most Wanted" list. Dozens of experiments have been searching for them, but ...