Picky females promote survival and diversity, new research says

Apr 01, 2012
The new Nature study on "picky females" may explain how cichlids, a fish found in Lake Victoria in Africa, can coexist in high diversity in the same habitat. (photo credit: Ole Seehausen, Fish Ecology and Evolution, Eawag, Switzerland)

(PhysOrg.com) -- Picky females play a critical role in the survival and diversity of species, according to a Nature study by researchers from the University of British Columbia and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria.

To date, biodiversity theories have focused on the role played by to the environment: the best equipped to cope with a habitat would win out, while others would gradually go extinct. The new study presents the first theoretical model demonstrating that selective mating alone can promote the long-term coexistence of species – such as frogs, crickets, grasshoppers and fish – that share the same ecological adaptations and readily interbreed.

"The focus on ecological adaptation has failed to explain much of the biodiversity we see right before our eyes," says the study's first author Leithen M'Gonigle, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California at Berkeley, who developed this work while a PhD candidate at UBC.

"Our model shows that species can stably coexist in the same habitat as long as two simple conditions are met. First, the distribution of resources they use must not be uniform, so that groups of with different mate preferences can occupy different resource hotspots. Second, females must pay a cost for being choosy, through reduced or fecundity," says M'Gonigle.

"Resource distributions are never uniform over space, even in seemingly homogeneous habitats like grasslands and lakes," says co-author Ulf Dieckmann, leader of the Evolution and Ecology Program at IIASA.

"By being picky, females almost always suffer a cost, because they spend energy either to find a preferred mate or to avoid an undesirable one," says UBC zoologist and co-author Sarah Otto, Canada Research Chair in Theoretical and Experimental Evolution and a 2011 fellow of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

"These costs turn out to be crucial for reinforcing species boundaries," says IIASA scholar and co-author Rupert Mazzucco. "Because they prevent females with a particular preference from invading areas dominated by males they find unattractive."

Overcoming the long-held belief that species can stably coexist only if they differ in their ecological adaptations, this study is opening up new vistas on understanding and protecting the grandeur of biological , according to the authors.

Explore further: Alternate mechanism of species formation picks up support, thanks to a South American ant

Related Stories

A new model for understanding biodiversity

Nov 21, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Animals like foxes and raccoons are highly adaptable. They move around and eat everything from insects to eggs. They and other "generalist feeders" like them may also be crucial to sustaining ...

Choosy females make colourful males

May 09, 2006

Female fish prefer brightly coloured males because they are easier to see and are in better shape concludes Dutch researcher Martine Maan following her study of fish speciation in the East African Lakes. Environmental variation ...

Frogs use calls to find mates with matching chromosomes

Dec 27, 2011

When it comes to love songs, female tree frogs are pretty picky. According to a new study from the University of Missouri, certain female tree frogs may be remarkably attuned to the songs of mates who share the same number ...

Recommended for you

Orb-weaving spiders living in urban areas may be larger

Aug 20, 2014

A common orb-weaving spider may grow larger and have an increased ability to reproduce when living in urban areas, according to a study published August 20, 2014 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Eli ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MandoZink
5 / 5 (1) Apr 01, 2012
"Picky"??? Who decides on the adjectives here? No doubt "bossy" editors. Need to be more "selective".
JVK
1.5 / 5 (2) Apr 01, 2012
Vertebrate sexual selection in any ecological niche is first dependent on sufficient nutrient chemicals that metabolize to species-specific chemical signals of reproductive fitness, which are associated with other sensory cues of reproductive fitness. What many people who study sexual selection in humans seem to miss is that nutrient chemicals and pheromones are more important to the neurophysiology of reproduction than are other sensory cues. Nutrient chemicals "calibrate" individual survival, and pheromones "standardize" and "control" speciation, which is important to consider when reading articles about sexual selection in any species. Invariably you will read something that tells you selection for visual appeal is most important in human sexual selection. But, there's no model for that! Selection is for pheromones in all species.
Cynical1
5 / 5 (1) Apr 01, 2012
Invariably you will read something that tells you selection for visual appeal is most important in human sexual selection. But, there's no model for that! Selection is for pheromones in all species.

I'd say my wife picking me is a pretty good example of that. It sure wasn't for my looks...
infiniteMadness
5 / 5 (2) Apr 02, 2012
sure, go reinforce your "species boundaries" and I'll laugh from my grave in 1000 years when this nation consists of metrosexual arrogant people screaming "ME! ME! ME! ME! ME!".
pass.
SCVGoodToGo
5 / 5 (2) Apr 02, 2012
in 1000 years when this nation consists of metrosexual arrogant people screaming "ME! ME! ME! ME! ME!".


I don't think you need to wait 1000 years for that....