Impacts could be boon for subterranean life

Apr 16, 2012 By Michael Schirber
On site at the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure, geologists examine and catalog core sections. Credit: Aaron L. Gronstal

An incoming asteroid is trouble whether you're a dinosaur or a Bruce Willis fan. But microbes living deep underground may actually welcome the news, according to a recent study of an ancient impact in the Chesapeake Bay. A biological census of the subsurface life forms suggests that impacts create new niches for these deep dwellers to spread into.

In the last couple of decades, biologists have come to realize that the biosphere doesn't stop at the surface. A large fraction of the Earth's is lurking down below. Several drilling projects have brought up evidence of hearty little thriving in deep rock sediments. Some eat organic scraps that seep down from our world, while others derive energy through with iron and sulfur.

Although it's hardly paradise, this netherworld has one thing going for it: it's fairly peaceful. There's no night or day, no winter or summer. No global warming or ice ages to worry about. Only the occasional earthquake or giant is really going to shake things up.

We typically think that crust-shattering asteroids or comets have only detrimental effects on life, but the opposite may be true for subterranean microbes. An impact will sterilize some of the rock with heat, but it will also make other areas more habitable.

"Impacts can fracture the rocks in the deep surface, which will allow fluids and nutrients to flow in," says Charles Cockell from the University of Edinburgh in Scotland.

Cockell and his colleagues decided to look at the subsurface life beneath one of the largest impact craters on Earth, the 85-kilometer wide crater in the . Their results, reported in a recent paper in the journal Astrobiology, suggest that the underground biosphere is still adapting to the 35 million year old impact. But it does appear that some microbes took advantage of the cataclysm to settle down deeper in the underworld.

Big dig

The Chesapeake Bay impact crater is the largest in the United States, but geologists only discovered it in 1983. It was created 35 million years ago when a kilometer-wide comet or struck the shallow coastal waters there.

"It carved out a deep hole, but material on the perimeter immediately slumped in," Cockell says. Models suggest that around 30 minutes later, the hole filled in when tsunami waves swept over the impact site and deposited a thick layer of fresh sediments.

The energy from the impact heated the rock at the base of the crater to more than 350 degrees Celsius. This would have killed all the life hiding in the subsurface. But as the rock cooled, life would have come to reclaim this disaster area.

"How long it would take them to move in depends on the porosity of the rock," Cockell says.

Location of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure and drill site. The location in relation to eastern USA is shown in the inset. The Chesapeake Bay impact crater is the largest known crater in the United States. Credit: Cockell et al., 2012

To study the aftermath, a project headed by the International Continental Drilling Program and the United States Geological Survey drilled down into the impact crater in 2005 and 2006 to recover core samples down to a depth of 1.76 kilometers (Aaron Gronstal, one of the participants, wrote a personal account of the dig).

The geological examination of the drill cores showed that the first 450 meters below the surface is sediment from more recent times. Between 450 meters and 1 kilometer, one finds "post impact" material that was swept back into the crater by the tsunami waves. The rock beneath about 1 kilometer was directly shocked and heated by the impact.

Cell counting

During the drilling process, biologists extracted samples from the rock in order to take a census of life in the impact crater. A total of 88 samples were collected from a wide range of depths.

Each sample was dissolved in solution and put in cold storage. At a later date, the researchers added a DNA-binding dye to each sample and placed them under a microscope. Individual microbes were counted by eye.

"It's long and tedious," Cockell says, "But this is fairly standard way to do it."

The team took special precautions to avoid contamination from "non-native" life forms. Different markers were added to the drilling mud during the drilling process. If any of these markers showed up in a biological sample, then the team would know that stuff had gotten in from outside.

Core samples for biological studies are carefully handled and sub-sampled under sterile conditions in an on site microbiology laboratory at the CBIS drill site. Credit: Aaron L. Gronstal

Restricting themselves to only the uncontaminated samples, the biologists found that the number of microbes per gram of rock decreased with depth, as is commonly observed at other drill sites. But in the impact-affected regions, there was a higher than usual amount of variation, as if the hadn't yet come back to equilibrium.

The researchers showed that this variation, or patchiness in the microbial distribution, was not because of some lack of nutrients. In fact, they found an abundance of sulfate and organic carbon throughout the drill core. The implication seems to be that 35 million years hasn't been enough time for the microbes to fill in the churned up rock from the impact.

"It's not a big surprise that it takes them millions of years to do it," Cockell says. "They have to get through impermeable sediments."

Breaking ground for new settlements

Deeper down, below about a kilometer, the researchers found an unusually high number of microbes, about a million cells per gram.

"No one has observed that many organisms at this depth," Cockell says.

The conclusion seems to be that the impact actually benefitted the microbes by enlarging the area where they could roam. The resulting fissures and cracks let in water and other nutrients into this deep rock, which made these areas more hospitable for deep-Earth dwellers.

"We should change the view of impacts, says Stephen Mojzsis of the University of Colorado, Boulder, who was not involved in the project. "We shouldn't see them as only destructive. They are a natural mechanism for opening up niches for the microbial community."

Mojzsis has argued that life may have prospered underground during the Late Heavy Bombardment when the Earth was pummeled with large impactors around 4 billion years ago. Although he believes microbes will re-colonize an faster than the authors claim to observe here, he does commend this "very thorough" study for quantitatively assessing the habitability of impact craters.

Mojzsis also agrees with the authors that craters may be a good place to look for signs of life on other worlds. Just as on Earth, impacts could have opened up new habitats for organisms that may have once lived on Mars.

"This may guide our hand in choosing a drill site for a future Mars mission," Mojzsis says.

Explore further: Suddenly, the sun is eerily quiet: Where did the sunspots go?

Related Stories

Asteroid sites hint at life on Mars

Apr 16, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Craters made by asteroid impacts may be the best place to look for signs of life on other planets, a study suggests.

More than a mile-long core retrieved from Crater Drilling

Jan 12, 2006

Following three months of around-the-clock work, the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater Deep Drilling Project successfully completed its operations, extracting more than a mile-long segment of rocks and sediments from the Earth. ...

Meteor impacts: Life's jump starter?

Aug 08, 2005

Meteor impacts are generally regarded as monstrous killers and one of the causes of mass extinctions throughout the history of life. But there is a chance the heavy bombardment of Earth by meteors during the planet's youth ...

USC awarded $3.9M for lab under the sea

Feb 22, 2008

Think of bacteria eating rock. Now think of bacteria eating rock below the ocean floor. How about experimenting on bacteria in that rock 15,000 feet underwater?

Recommended for you

New launch date set for ISS delivery vessel

35 minutes ago

A robot ship will be launched from Kourou, French Guiana, after a five-day delay on July 29 to deliver provisions to the International Space Station, space transport firm Arianespace said Tuesday.

The heart of an astronaut, five years on

2 hours ago

The heart of an astronaut is a much-studied thing. Scientists have analyzed its blood flow, rhythms, atrophy and, through journal studies, even matters of the heart. But for the first time, researchers are ...

Image: Kaleidoscopic view of Mars

7 hours ago

Astrophotographer Leo Aerts from Belgium took advantage of the recent opposition of Mars and captured the Red Planet both "coming and going" in this montage of images taken from October 2013 to June of 2014. ...

Wake up, robot

9 hours ago

Code, play and command your space droid – students across Europe can bring a squadron of minisatellites to life on the International Space Station as the ultimate space robot game.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (6) Apr 16, 2012
Mojzsis has argued that life may have prospered underground during the Late Heavy Bombardment when the Earth was pummeled with large impactors around 4 billion years ago.

OK, let's assume this is true. The question then arises : Just when DID life get started on earth since it's supposed to be about 4.6 Billion years old? Did life arise so SOON after the earth was formed? Or did it arrive here WITH the supposed late, heavy bombardment?
How DID life get here, according to the nebular theory of planetary formation? Or is that abiogenesis? or should it be Evolution?
Shootist
5 / 5 (1) Apr 16, 2012
"We should change the view of impacts, says Stephen Mojzsis of the University of Colorado, Boulder, who was not involved in the project. "We shouldn't see them as only destructive. They are a natural mechanism for opening up niches for the microbial community."


And Humans' progenitors, as well.
Shootist
5 / 5 (1) Apr 16, 2012
OK, let's assume this is true.


Which part? That the impact happened? Or that life moved in after the impact?

As to your question, oh troll, about when? Ask Sir Fred Hoyle's ghost. He knows. Hint: Perhaps by the very same mechanism as mentioned in the essay.
bewertow
3.7 / 5 (3) Apr 16, 2012
Mojzsis has argued that life may have prospered underground during the Late Heavy Bombardment when the Earth was pummeled with large impactors around 4 billion years ago.

OK, let's assume this is true. The question then arises : Just when DID life get started on earth since it's supposed to be about 4.6 Billion years old? Did life arise so SOON after the earth was formed? Or did it arrive here WITH the supposed late, heavy bombardment?
How DID life get here, according to the nebular theory of planetary formation? Or is that abiogenesis? or should it be Evolution?


Word on the street is that there are biology textbooks in the library. Read one.