Hollywood studios lose landmark download case

Apr 20, 2012 by Martin Parry

Top Hollywood film studios Friday failed in their attempt to stem the flow of illegal downloads when they lost a landmark appeal against an Australian Internet provider.

A group of international and Australian companies, including Warner Bros, Disney and 20th Century Fox, alleged that iiNet authorised the infringement of their when its customers downloaded movies and television programmes.

In a world-first judgement in 2010, Australia's Federal Court ruled iiNet did not authorise the downloads or have the power to stop them, thwarting the studios' attempt to staunch losses they say run into billions of dollars.

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), made up of 34 film, television and music companies, appealed, claiming it set a dangerous precedent that allowed Internet companies to ignore copyright theft.

But in a serious blow to their fight against piracy it was thrown out by Australia's highest court Friday.

"The High Court held that the respondent, an (ISP), had not authorised the infringement by its customers of the appellants' copyright in commercially released films and television programmes," the unanimous ruling said.

It added that iiNet had no direct technical power to prevent its customers from using the BitTorrent file sharing system to infringe copyright, by downloading content to watch on their laptops and PCs.

"Rather, the extent of iiNet's power to prevent its customers from infringing... copyright was limited to an indirect power to terminate its contractual relationship with its customers," the court said.

The case was seen as an ambitious attempt to force ISPs to act against piracy.

It hinged on thousands of downloads over the Perth-based iiNet network over 59 weeks from June 2008 involving nearly 90 films and TV series including "Batman Begins", "Transformers" and "Heroes".

The movie studios had hoped to set a worldwide precedent forcing ISPs to act against offenders, while Internet rights groups feared it would compel the firms to cut customers' web access without having to take them to court.

AFACT managing director Neil Gane said the judgement exposed the failure of copyright law to keep pace with the online environment.

"Both judgements in this case recognise that copyright law is no longer equipped to deal with the rate of technological change we have seen since the law of authorisation was last tested," he said.

Gane added that the global film and television industry, represented by the Los Angeles-based Motion Picture Association, was pursuing other avenues including targeting the software developers behind BitTorrent technology.

iiNet chief executive Michael Malone said the best way for the film industry to protect copyright was to boost the availability of lawful, online content in a more timely and affordable way.

He added that there was strong evidence that content partnerships and agreements between ISPs, legal websites and copyright holders was the best way to reduce piracy, rather than costly legal battles.

"Increasing the availability of licensed digital content is the best, most practical approach to meet consumer demand and protect copyright," Malone said.

"We have consistently said we are eager to work with the studios to make their very desirable material legitimately available to a waiting customer base and that offer remains the same today."

Explore further: Twitpic to stay alive with new owner

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hollywood lodges appeal in Internet piracy case

Feb 25, 2010

Hollywood film studios Thursday lodged an appeal against a landmark legal judgment which found an Australian Internet provider was not responsible for illegal movie downloads by its customers.

Fears Australian piracy case could shut off net

Jan 31, 2010

Australian Internet rights groups fear a piracy court case could force Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to become "copyright cops" and cut web access to customers who make illegal downloads.

Hollywood fights online piracy in UK court case

Jun 28, 2011

Hollywood film studios launched legal action Tuesday against Britain's biggest Internet service provider in a fight against online piracy, thought to be the first case of its kind in the country.

AT&T to start sending copyright warnings

Mar 26, 2009

(AP) -- AT&T Inc., the nation's largest Internet service provider, will start sending warnings to its subscribers when music labels and movie studios allege that they are trafficking in pirated material, according to an ...

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

Sep 17, 2014

Online ratings operator Yelp agreed to pay $450,000 to settle US charges that it illegally collected data on children, in violation of privacy laws, officials said Wednesday.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

OldBlackCrow
5 / 5 (2) Apr 20, 2012
One major battle won... :-)
Lurker2358
not rated yet Apr 20, 2012
Yeah, we need weaker copyrights and patents, not stronger, that's the only way to avoid technological tyranny.

SoylentGrin
not rated yet Apr 20, 2012
global film and television industry...was pursuing other avenues including targeting the software developers behind BitTorrent technology.


"Mr. Jones, your company makes hammers, right?"
"Yes."
"Those hammers have been used in the commission of crimes?"
"...um..."
"I rest my case, your Honor."

Infinite Fractal Consciousness
not rated yet Apr 21, 2012
"...thwarting the studios' attempt to staunch losses they say run into billions of dollars."

As if each download represents a paying customer. A lot of crap movies that no one wants to pay to see get downloaded. If the pirating were thwarted, those people aren't going to rush out and buy legit copies of every B movie that strikes their fancy. Just sayin'.
CardacianNeverid
not rated yet Apr 21, 2012
The more the US corporatocracy overreaches its power and tramples over other sovereign nations' laws, the bigger the backlash will be. This is a good first step. Europe, now it's your turn to step up to the plate. Fuck you SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, CISPA!